lol wrote: k2335

ara do u do mealprepsunday? i should really start cooking actual food instead of mcdonalds everyday but i can make toast and pasta max

nah, since I get basic ingredients and make different types of food throughout the entire week instead. It seems to me mealprepsunday is a good idea for people who want to save money and time, but since I really enjoy cooking I don't mind spending max. 2 hours prepping one single meal (I cook for myself and my bf), and moneywise I'm already saving by buying ingredients that can be used in everything.

I'd definitely recommend bone broth - if you get some bones, add some vinegar, and simmer if for a number of hours, it extracts the collagen from the bones, making the broth very thick and delicious, and it turns to jelly in the fridge. It's also supposedly very good for you. If there's too much fat, you can just put it in the fridge and take the fat of the top when it's cold.

I would have done bone instead but I didn't feel like going out and buy some since it was already pretty late. I already know how to make bone broth but I'm glad you posted how anyways because it's definitely very useful cooking knowledge.

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Do you understand the concept of something as a whole? Go to any "neutral" subreddt, /r/politics, /r/australia, it's overwhelmingly left-wing. The true right right-wing subreddits are few and far between, that is, if they're not outright banned. Even the "right-wing" subreddits are affected by left-wing influence. Compare /r/the_donald to /pol/, or /r/libertarian to /liberty/

what are you even talking about. "neutral subreddits"? there isn't such a thing, everyone with half a brain understands that each subreddits' community will have its own preferences and biases. you seriously expect to go to r/politics and find a 100% even split from all areas of the political spectrum? I bet you wouldn't even want that


"compare the_donald to /pol/"- guess what, different websites have different communities too. What A Shock

the majority of reddits s are left-leaning or left-wing, therefore the site as a whole is left-leaning

i'd suggest you read the entire exchange so you can understand the conversation, railey

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

the majority of reddits s are left-leaning or left-wing, therefore the site as a whole is left-leaning

by american standards, yes. But that's still right-wing.

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

the majority of reddits s are left-leaning or left-wing, therefore the site as a whole is left-leaning

by american standards, yes. But that's still right-wing.

can you two please read entire conversations instead of focusing on single bullet-points, thank you

nobody's discussing this

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

are you actually so dense that you can't understand the concept of different subreddits having different communities?

what, is the_donald too leftist for you?

Do you understand the concept of something as a whole? Go to any "neutral" subreddt, /r/politics, /r/australia, it's overwhelmingly left-wing. The true right right-wing subreddits are few and far between, that is, if they're not outright banned. Even the "right-wing" subreddits are affected by left-wing influence. Compare /r/the_donald to /pol/, or /r/libertarian to /liberty/

here you did argue this

further back, you illiterate

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Is "LGBT" your trigger word to take sides on any issue? The community was definitely overwhelmingly against such a thing, it was just a, if I may be permitted to use the word, toxic incursion of political agenda into a game that people play as a means of escapism. And when is became apparent that the community didn't want it? And this is Reddit, one of the most left-wing mainstream sites on the internet.

(picture of poll of r/2007scape showing that people voted no to the pride event)

and then you had a back and forth discussion on that point, so i commented on that. Whats the problem

I think you're just getting mad over trivialities.

good job guys, you successfully span the argument to the point where B1rd doesn't need to defend his points anymore

top quality discourse

Yeah let's get back to the original point

ESO is pretty decent.

ESO was a big waste of time.

BrokenArrow wrote: 6i5o49

ESO is pretty decent.

because of the new warden class I've been surrounded by BEAR PEOPLE please somebody send help

Let's talk about Friends

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

Let's talk about Friends

I loved the show.

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

Let's talk about Friends

i dont have any

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

good job guys, you successfully span the argument to the point where B1rd doesn't need to defend his points anymore

top quality discourse

B1rd never defends his points in the first place

johnmedina999 wrote: 3r3a6s

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

Let's talk about Friends

I loved the show.

Best anime of the decade

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

Let's talk about Friends

i dont have any

Well, I wanted to talk about Friends not friends

excuse me my little pony is the best anime of the decade

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

oh by the way, I made my own ramen broth last night and it was quite good AMA

Who did you poison this time?

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

excuse me my little pony is the best anime of the decade

Kemono Friends beats mlp in every aspect

does it have ponies?

It has anthropomorphised animals

mehhhhhhhhh

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

johnmedina999 wrote: 3r3a6s

I loved the show.

Best anime of the decade

i think he meant the american version since you didn't specify which one

Oh
Umm

johnmedina999 wrote: 3r3a6s

Oh
Umm

Did we not mean this one?

nope



this one

Well, shit.

Friends > Anthropomorphic furry fap material

Japan - everything from soda cans to dragons are inexplicable sentient and have the form of a cute anime girl.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Japan - everything from soda cans to dragons are inexplicable sentient and have the form of a cute anime girl.

OMG SOOOO true xD

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

jesus christ

I hope that was made behind at least 6 layers of irony

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

I hope that was made behind at least 6 layers of irony

if she's 8 I'm 5

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

I hope that was made behind at least 6 layers of irony

if she's 8 I'm 5

if ur 5 im rohulk

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

if she's 8 I'm 5

out of 10?
you're a 9 babe

I am a 9 year old loli

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

You can insert multiple dicks in it

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

excuse me my little pony is the best anime of the decade

Kemono Friends beats mlp in every aspect

i agree to the fullest yes yes yes

Meah wrote: f4f5b

respecting wahmen*

v

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

SPOILER

Friends not for lewds

friends with benefits kicks in

v

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

social security tanya degurechaff

what is wrong with you

What are you talking about?

.

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

their posts are somehow better than 3/4 of OT

Who are you talking about?

.

"their"
I'm confused.

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Who are you talking about?

UltraHenzie's, of course

UltraHenzie's what? He is one person, not plural, stop using wrong grammar just because you want to use gender-neutral language.

Oh boy

EDIT: sorry for being a fucking idiot all the time

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

UltraHenzie's, of course

UltraHenzie's what? He is one person, not plural, stop using wrong grammar just because you want to use gender-neutral language.

It's just substituting 'their' with a name, wyd
That makes perfect sense

I dont really get why raspberriel even responded to that obvious bait. She should think at least 1 second before posting a reply to something.

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

This is an online forum, not a goddamn job application essay. Shove your pretentious "oh, I HAVE to be better than you in every single way" bullshit right back where it came from.

What are you talking about? I'm not being pretentious or trying to be better than you, I'm telling you that you're using not using English correctly. If you want debase the English language with your political agenda, go to Tumblr and create all the feminist newspeak words you want. But here, this is an English-speaking forum, so speak proper English.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

UltraHenzie's, of course

UltraHenzie's what? He is one person, not plural, stop using wrong grammar just because you want to use gender-neutral language.

MUH POLITICALLY CORRECT SINGULAR THEY

REEEEEEEEEEEE

shakespeare used it, you idiot

This fucking page lmao

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

shakespeare used it, you idiot

I don't mind people using they but Shakespeare was a fucking faggot.

Read the whole book of Grammar 101.
______________________________

This fucking page lmao

Topsy turvy, blah blah blah,
grammar, blah blah blah
Brushittas, blah blah blah

Try not connect anarchists with socialists.
Thank you: I can tell your hermaphrodite result if you want to.
Just because you talked about me doesn't mean that you know me.... sometimes....
urusai...

It's not grammatically wrong to use the "they" with a singular meaning. It's often found in official documents. No need to jump on assumption about gender and Tumblr, really. It's also a good way to prevent yourself from repeating "he" or "she" all the time.

What are you talking about? I'm not being pretentious or trying to be better than you, I'm telling you that you're using not using English correctly. If you want debase the English language with your political agenda, go to Tumblr and create all the feminist newspeak words you want. But here, this is an English-speaking forum, so speak proper English.

It's appropriate to use when you don't know somebody's gender until they tell you so. Also, "they" is not feminist newspeak either.

what's wrong with women wanting to be equal to men

jesus

GOD I hate my own creativity with things.
I just put a scribbly scrabbly with the doobie for this big red.

Raspberriel stop being a fucking pussy and stop deleting posts

Zain bear my child

Although I sometimes agree on that...
OT: Oh so now you're saying I'm an idiot,
just because I misused grammar?
Just wow.

Lesson number 1:

Do you have Coke?
: Coke?
The long vowel of the o?
Shape your mouth to make the long o sound like row.
Focus on the parts in bold.

Ok, let's take it to the next level.
The Mid central rounded vowel.

Only part of the languages use it.
It's not very tricky. "hoppe."
Looks innocent does it?
Well, you're fucked as soon you see how to pronounce it. Go on. TRY IT YOURSELF

Does it rhyme with "shop"?

johnmedina999 wrote: 3r3a6s

Does it rhyme with "shop"?

N O

[ˈhɒ̜̽b̥ɵ̞]

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

It's not grammatically wrong to use the "they" with a singular meaning. It's often found in official documents. No need to jump on assumption about gender and Tumblr, really. It's also a good way to prevent yourself from repeating "he" or "she" all the time.

It's appropriate to use when you don't know somebody's gender until they tell you so. Also, "they" is not feminist newspeak either.

I'm not jumping to any conclusions, it's pretty obvious why they're using it. And perhaps more people are using it in recent times, but it's far from universal, and it still sounds completely foreign it me, especially when used in such a way for a known individual. If you don't know a person's sex, "he" is appropriate.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

I'm not jumping to any conclusions, it's pretty obvious why they're using it. And perhaps more people are using it in recent times, but it's far from universal, and it still sounds completely foreign it me, especially when used in such a way for a known individual. If you don't know a person's sex, "he" is appropriate.

congratulations, you played yourself

Maybe try getting less triggered by the English language m8

they

I won't expect you to understand the difference between singular and plural. Don't worry.

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

Although I sometimes agree on that...
OT: Oh so now you're saying I'm an idiot,
just because I misused grammar?
Just wow.

Lesson number 1:

Do you have Coke?
: Coke?
The long vowel of the o?
Shape your mouth to make the long o sound like row.
Focus on the parts in bold.

Ok, let's take it to the next level.
The Mid central rounded vowel.

Only part of the languages use it.
It's not very tricky. "hoppe."
Looks innocent does it?
Well, you're fucked as soon you see how to pronounce it. Go on. TRY IT YOURSELF

Is it pronounced the same was as in Hans-Hermann "physical removal" Hoppe?

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

I won't expect you to understand the difference between singular and plural. Don't worry.

Wait, who are you talking to?
Because I literally did: One and only =/= more than one. And I just throw the shitty subject and grab a new one. For instance, "time." It is actually countable and uncountable; still, when it's both it makes a FACHIAL MESS!! inhales

to further clarify

I'm not jumping to any conclusions, it's pretty obvious why they(Referring to the single poster, UltraHenzie)'re using it

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

johnmedina999 wrote: 3r3a6s

Does it rhyme with "shop"?

N O

[ˈhɒ̜̽b̥ɵ̞]

Ah, it's Danish.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

This is an online forum, not a goddamn job application essay. Shove your pretentious "oh, I HAVE to be better than you in every single way" bullshit right back where it came from.

What are you talking about? I'm not being pretentious or trying to be better than you, I'm telling you that you're using not using English correctly. If you want debase the English language with your political agenda, go to Tumblr and create all the feminist newspeak words you want. But here, this is an English-speaking forum, so speak proper English.

OR both of you stop being fucking twats.

Bird, mate, it's completely grammatically correct to use "they" when referring to someone, and there's plenty of evidence to back that up from history.

HOWEVER, the reason you're being a mongrel is because you attacked Rasp for the wrong thing. While "they" is completely fine in use here, why the fuck would you do so? You can easily say "he" as the chances are VERY high Ultra is a guy, simply from how Internet works. If it turns out that he's indeed a she, you politely apologise and we all go our merry way.

Goddamn mongrels...

aurani ily

Ah, it's Danish.

What a NOT SO hard language.
I'm puzzled and my stomach is churning whether I'm the one starting it. Turns out I am.

OT: Did I just?

Aurani wrote: k3n52

If it turns out that he's indeed a she, you politely apologise and we all go our merry way.

To be fair, you can skip this pointless aspect by just using gender-neutral when referring to unknown people.

Regardless, it's not a big deal, B1rd is just convinced that he needs to continue fighting a war against the feminist agenda that exists in his head.

Yeah, that would be valid if you couldn't assume his gender. In this case, it's NOT a 50-50 whether he's a guy or a girl, so it's completely fine to say "he" instead of "they".

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

to further clarify

I'm not jumping to any conclusions, it's pretty obvious why they(Referring to the single poster, UltraHenzie)'re using it

Why on earth would I be referring to UltraHenzie, when he wasn't even the one using singular they? I was referring to all the people who use singular they. Take you own advice and don't try to nitpick grammar when you're not even right.

I... guess? I don't see the ratio as important, and generally just use gender-neutral unless I have a reason to (i.e. if I know the gender of the speaker). Works fine for all my communication, so having needless potential confusion (regardless of how likely it is that there'll be a mix-up) seems silly and pointless to me.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Why on earth would I be referring to UltraHenzie, when he wasn't even the one using singular they? I was referring to all the people who use singular they. Take you own advice and don't try to nitpick grammar when you're not even right.

My mistake- you were referring to Raspberriel, as shown by the conversation. (Didn't go back to check who you were originally picking a fight with).

If you weren't referring to Raspberriel, then I can instead commend you on your inability to clearly communicate in conversation. You're a native speaker and yet you make silly mistakes like that while attempting to correct others' grammar, which is quite frankly sad.

Singular they is still perfectly valid, by the way. You had no grounds with this to start with, and you needlessly start arguments based on politics that nobody else is interested in.

I already told you who I was referring to. And just because I took it on myself to point out something, you have to go on a crusade to try to nitpick my sentences apart. Frankly, you're annoying. Buzz away.

Is it pronounced the same was as in Hans-Hermann "physical removal" Hoppe?

What do you mean?

FuZ wrote: 6f1pt

put back your pingu ultrahenzie

Maybe you could've just dealt with the pressure.

put back your pingu ultrahenzie

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

I... guess? I don't see the ratio as important, and generally just use gender-neutral unless I have a reason to (i.e. if I know the gender of the speaker). Works fine for all my communication, so having needless potential confusion (regardless of how likely it is that there'll be a mix-up) seems silly and pointless to me.

Don't get me wrong, using both is completely fine. I just prefer to use "he" on forums for the aforementioned reason, and it's a nice conversation starter.

"nice"
Shit is shit.
DAMN!!

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

"nice"
Shit is shit.
DAMN!!

I agree with this statement.

Aurani wrote: k3n52

random
wow.
i thought we had something special. ):

"Random"
looks like you'll be getting a
washi washi parlour

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

Is it pronounced the same was as in Hans-Hermann "physical removal" Hoppe?

What do you mean?

This guy

I know you ITT regulars are quick tempered and odious, but this is just taking it to another level. Every single topic of discussion turns into a shitfest, and it's really an eyesore for an outsider/neutral. I know it's a part of your little circlejerk, but you should really cut it down a bit. It's downright annoying.

This "memey" thread title is become a reality

We post shit

Yes you do.

neither funny nor interesting

Yes it is.

Objectively

This is the most polite way of me saying "fuck you".

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

Aurani wrote: k3n52

random
wow.
i thought we had something special. ):

random beautiful

Word: hoppe
"German: [ˈhɔpə]"
"Danish: [ˈhɒ̜̽b̥ɵ̞]"
Nah.
In the word "hoppe," the danish word has the Mid central rounded vowel
for the e, while the German word doesn't.

My son has met with a squirrel. They shared a bit of sauce and stormed the sea with a shovel.

Trump released a couple of videos of Polish Hearthstone, and I have to say, it looks like an incredibly difficult language to speak. No clue how such a thing would've naturally evolved, but that'd be my English-speaker bias showing pretty heavily

Comfy Slippers wrote: 4v5r2f

I know you ITT regulars are quick tempered and odious, but this is just taking it to another level. Every single topic of discussion turns into a shitfest, and it's really an eyesore for an outsider/neutral. I know it's a part of your little circlejerk, but you should really cut it down a bit. It's downright annoying.

This "memey" thread title is become a reality

We post shit

Yes you do.

neither funny nor interesting

Yes it is.

Objectively

This is the most polite way of me saying "fuck you".

If you don't want to see anyone arguing, you should leave the internet.

Incidentally though, I have been in a bad mood today.