I hope that was made behind at least 6 layers of irony

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

I hope that was made behind at least 6 layers of irony

if she's 8 I'm 5

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

I hope that was made behind at least 6 layers of irony

if she's 8 I'm 5

if ur 5 im rohulk

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

if she's 8 I'm 5

out of 10?
you're a 9 babe

I am a 9 year old loli

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

You can insert multiple dicks in it

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

excuse me my little pony is the best anime of the decade

Kemono Friends beats mlp in every aspect

i agree to the fullest yes yes yes

Meah wrote: f4f5b

respecting wahmen*

v

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

SPOILER

Friends not for lewds

friends with benefits kicks in

v

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

social security tanya degurechaff

what is wrong with you

What are you talking about?

.

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

their posts are somehow better than 3/4 of OT

Who are you talking about?

.

"their"
I'm confused.

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Who are you talking about?

UltraHenzie's, of course

UltraHenzie's what? He is one person, not plural, stop using wrong grammar just because you want to use gender-neutral language.

Oh boy

EDIT: sorry for being a fucking idiot all the time

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

UltraHenzie's, of course

UltraHenzie's what? He is one person, not plural, stop using wrong grammar just because you want to use gender-neutral language.

It's just substituting 'their' with a name, wyd
That makes perfect sense

I dont really get why raspberriel even responded to that obvious bait. She should think at least 1 second before posting a reply to something.

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

This is an online forum, not a goddamn job application essay. Shove your pretentious "oh, I HAVE to be better than you in every single way" bullshit right back where it came from.

What are you talking about? I'm not being pretentious or trying to be better than you, I'm telling you that you're using not using English correctly. If you want debase the English language with your political agenda, go to Tumblr and create all the feminist newspeak words you want. But here, this is an English-speaking forum, so speak proper English.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

UltraHenzie's, of course

UltraHenzie's what? He is one person, not plural, stop using wrong grammar just because you want to use gender-neutral language.

MUH POLITICALLY CORRECT SINGULAR THEY

REEEEEEEEEEEE

shakespeare used it, you idiot

This fucking page lmao

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

shakespeare used it, you idiot

I don't mind people using they but Shakespeare was a fucking faggot.

Read the whole book of Grammar 101.
______________________________

This fucking page lmao

Topsy turvy, blah blah blah,
grammar, blah blah blah
Brushittas, blah blah blah

Try not connect anarchists with socialists.
Thank you: I can tell your hermaphrodite result if you want to.
Just because you talked about me doesn't mean that you know me.... sometimes....
urusai...

It's not grammatically wrong to use the "they" with a singular meaning. It's often found in official documents. No need to jump on assumption about gender and Tumblr, really. It's also a good way to prevent yourself from repeating "he" or "she" all the time.

What are you talking about? I'm not being pretentious or trying to be better than you, I'm telling you that you're using not using English correctly. If you want debase the English language with your political agenda, go to Tumblr and create all the feminist newspeak words you want. But here, this is an English-speaking forum, so speak proper English.

It's appropriate to use when you don't know somebody's gender until they tell you so. Also, "they" is not feminist newspeak either.

what's wrong with women wanting to be equal to men

jesus

GOD I hate my own creativity with things.
I just put a scribbly scrabbly with the doobie for this big red.

Raspberriel stop being a fucking pussy and stop deleting posts

Zain bear my child

Although I sometimes agree on that...
OT: Oh so now you're saying I'm an idiot,
just because I misused grammar?
Just wow.

Lesson number 1:

Do you have Coke?
: Coke?
The long vowel of the o?
Shape your mouth to make the long o sound like row.
Focus on the parts in bold.

Ok, let's take it to the next level.
The Mid central rounded vowel.

Only part of the languages use it.
It's not very tricky. "hoppe."
Looks innocent does it?
Well, you're fucked as soon you see how to pronounce it. Go on. TRY IT YOURSELF

Does it rhyme with "shop"?

johnmedina999 wrote: 3r3a6s

Does it rhyme with "shop"?

N O

[ˈhɒ̜̽b̥ɵ̞]

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

It's not grammatically wrong to use the "they" with a singular meaning. It's often found in official documents. No need to jump on assumption about gender and Tumblr, really. It's also a good way to prevent yourself from repeating "he" or "she" all the time.

It's appropriate to use when you don't know somebody's gender until they tell you so. Also, "they" is not feminist newspeak either.

I'm not jumping to any conclusions, it's pretty obvious why they're using it. And perhaps more people are using it in recent times, but it's far from universal, and it still sounds completely foreign it me, especially when used in such a way for a known individual. If you don't know a person's sex, "he" is appropriate.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

I'm not jumping to any conclusions, it's pretty obvious why they're using it. And perhaps more people are using it in recent times, but it's far from universal, and it still sounds completely foreign it me, especially when used in such a way for a known individual. If you don't know a person's sex, "he" is appropriate.

congratulations, you played yourself

Maybe try getting less triggered by the English language m8

they

I won't expect you to understand the difference between singular and plural. Don't worry.

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

Although I sometimes agree on that...
OT: Oh so now you're saying I'm an idiot,
just because I misused grammar?
Just wow.

Lesson number 1:

Do you have Coke?
: Coke?
The long vowel of the o?
Shape your mouth to make the long o sound like row.
Focus on the parts in bold.

Ok, let's take it to the next level.
The Mid central rounded vowel.

Only part of the languages use it.
It's not very tricky. "hoppe."
Looks innocent does it?
Well, you're fucked as soon you see how to pronounce it. Go on. TRY IT YOURSELF

Is it pronounced the same was as in Hans-Hermann "physical removal" Hoppe?

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

I won't expect you to understand the difference between singular and plural. Don't worry.

Wait, who are you talking to?
Because I literally did: One and only =/= more than one. And I just throw the shitty subject and grab a new one. For instance, "time." It is actually countable and uncountable; still, when it's both it makes a FACHIAL MESS!! inhales

to further clarify

I'm not jumping to any conclusions, it's pretty obvious why they(Referring to the single poster, UltraHenzie)'re using it

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

johnmedina999 wrote: 3r3a6s

Does it rhyme with "shop"?

N O

[ˈhɒ̜̽b̥ɵ̞]

Ah, it's Danish.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

This is an online forum, not a goddamn job application essay. Shove your pretentious "oh, I HAVE to be better than you in every single way" bullshit right back where it came from.

What are you talking about? I'm not being pretentious or trying to be better than you, I'm telling you that you're using not using English correctly. If you want debase the English language with your political agenda, go to Tumblr and create all the feminist newspeak words you want. But here, this is an English-speaking forum, so speak proper English.

OR both of you stop being fucking twats.

Bird, mate, it's completely grammatically correct to use "they" when referring to someone, and there's plenty of evidence to back that up from history.

HOWEVER, the reason you're being a mongrel is because you attacked Rasp for the wrong thing. While "they" is completely fine in use here, why the fuck would you do so? You can easily say "he" as the chances are VERY high Ultra is a guy, simply from how Internet works. If it turns out that he's indeed a she, you politely apologise and we all go our merry way.

Goddamn mongrels...

aurani ily

Ah, it's Danish.

What a NOT SO hard language.
I'm puzzled and my stomach is churning whether I'm the one starting it. Turns out I am.

OT: Did I just?

Aurani wrote: k3n52

If it turns out that he's indeed a she, you politely apologise and we all go our merry way.

To be fair, you can skip this pointless aspect by just using gender-neutral when referring to unknown people.

Regardless, it's not a big deal, B1rd is just convinced that he needs to continue fighting a war against the feminist agenda that exists in his head.

Yeah, that would be valid if you couldn't assume his gender. In this case, it's NOT a 50-50 whether he's a guy or a girl, so it's completely fine to say "he" instead of "they".

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

to further clarify

I'm not jumping to any conclusions, it's pretty obvious why they(Referring to the single poster, UltraHenzie)'re using it

Why on earth would I be referring to UltraHenzie, when he wasn't even the one using singular they? I was referring to all the people who use singular they. Take you own advice and don't try to nitpick grammar when you're not even right.

I... guess? I don't see the ratio as important, and generally just use gender-neutral unless I have a reason to (i.e. if I know the gender of the speaker). Works fine for all my communication, so having needless potential confusion (regardless of how likely it is that there'll be a mix-up) seems silly and pointless to me.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Why on earth would I be referring to UltraHenzie, when he wasn't even the one using singular they? I was referring to all the people who use singular they. Take you own advice and don't try to nitpick grammar when you're not even right.

My mistake- you were referring to Raspberriel, as shown by the conversation. (Didn't go back to check who you were originally picking a fight with).

If you weren't referring to Raspberriel, then I can instead commend you on your inability to clearly communicate in conversation. You're a native speaker and yet you make silly mistakes like that while attempting to correct others' grammar, which is quite frankly sad.

Singular they is still perfectly valid, by the way. You had no grounds with this to start with, and you needlessly start arguments based on politics that nobody else is interested in.

I already told you who I was referring to. And just because I took it on myself to point out something, you have to go on a crusade to try to nitpick my sentences apart. Frankly, you're annoying. Buzz away.

Is it pronounced the same was as in Hans-Hermann "physical removal" Hoppe?

What do you mean?

FuZ wrote: 6f1pt

put back your pingu ultrahenzie

Maybe you could've just dealt with the pressure.

put back your pingu ultrahenzie

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

I... guess? I don't see the ratio as important, and generally just use gender-neutral unless I have a reason to (i.e. if I know the gender of the speaker). Works fine for all my communication, so having needless potential confusion (regardless of how likely it is that there'll be a mix-up) seems silly and pointless to me.

Don't get me wrong, using both is completely fine. I just prefer to use "he" on forums for the aforementioned reason, and it's a nice conversation starter.

"nice"
Shit is shit.
DAMN!!

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

"nice"
Shit is shit.
DAMN!!

I agree with this statement.

Aurani wrote: k3n52

random
wow.
i thought we had something special. ):

"Random"
looks like you'll be getting a
washi washi parlour

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

Is it pronounced the same was as in Hans-Hermann "physical removal" Hoppe?

What do you mean?

This guy

I know you ITT regulars are quick tempered and odious, but this is just taking it to another level. Every single topic of discussion turns into a shitfest, and it's really an eyesore for an outsider/neutral. I know it's a part of your little circlejerk, but you should really cut it down a bit. It's downright annoying.

This "memey" thread title is become a reality

We post shit

Yes you do.

neither funny nor interesting

Yes it is.

Objectively

This is the most polite way of me saying "fuck you".

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

Aurani wrote: k3n52

random
wow.
i thought we had something special. ):

random beautiful

Word: hoppe
"German: [ˈhɔpə]"
"Danish: [ˈhɒ̜̽b̥ɵ̞]"
Nah.
In the word "hoppe," the danish word has the Mid central rounded vowel
for the e, while the German word doesn't.

My son has met with a squirrel. They shared a bit of sauce and stormed the sea with a shovel.

Trump released a couple of videos of Polish Hearthstone, and I have to say, it looks like an incredibly difficult language to speak. No clue how such a thing would've naturally evolved, but that'd be my English-speaker bias showing pretty heavily

Comfy Slippers wrote: 4v5r2f

I know you ITT regulars are quick tempered and odious, but this is just taking it to another level. Every single topic of discussion turns into a shitfest, and it's really an eyesore for an outsider/neutral. I know it's a part of your little circlejerk, but you should really cut it down a bit. It's downright annoying.

This "memey" thread title is become a reality

We post shit

Yes you do.

neither funny nor interesting

Yes it is.

Objectively

This is the most polite way of me saying "fuck you".

If you don't want to see anyone arguing, you should leave the internet.

Incidentally though, I have been in a bad mood today.

Don't respond to that guy, he baits even harder than you do, lol

I am very upset about how you described his baits.
It's not funny. I'm really upset.
Oh, I'm so sweet?
Like I care mother of fucc.
Sweet storage of
hard drive and recovery discs I do not
want to ridge to you at a poem
which is selling at a blog post that
has over a million likes that gained
its popularity before
someone deleted it.

If you don't want to see anyone arguing, you should leave the internet.

In a small society, I don't. Bigger ones attract different personalities and people (for the most part) don't know each other well. On the other hand, a couple of you have been doing this forever. It wouldn't hurt to create some positivity, and break free from this monotony.

If you're expecting change, you've come to the wrong thread.

You make it sound like something drastic, and its sad to see someone with such a standpoint. Casual lighthearted discussion isn't something that should be considered a "change".

Like some drastic change...
DRASTIC?!
I don't think this would be one.
I'm at Stage 4.

UltraHenzie wrote: 411z4m

I'm at Stage 4.

Same.

Comfy Slippers wrote: 4v5r2f

You make it sound like something drastic, and its sad to see someone with such a standpoint. Casual lighthearted discussion isn't something that should be considered a "change".

I'd love to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I know you're baiting the shit out of me there to get me to talk about something completely unnecessary.

feminism is a good thing

Comfy Slippers wrote: 4v5r2f

If you don't want to see anyone arguing, you should leave the internet.

In a small society, I don't. Bigger ones attract different personalities and people (for the most part) don't know each other well. On the other hand, a couple of you have been doing this forever. It wouldn't hurt to create some positivity, and break free from this monotony.

Yeah, just like B1rd I was already feeling a bit annoyed when I wanted to let off some steam and make a joke-y post here. I really shouldn't have reacted the way I did, and I'm glad I was able to keep myself from posting more.

It would help if I, and a few others here, weren't so cynical about each other's intentions. That's the mentality that's been keeping me on edge for months now, and it's not a pleasant experience at all. (And yes, I've said something like this before.)

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

feminism is a good thing

Females are objectively inferior to males.

Comfy Slippers wrote: 4v5r2f

This "memey" thread title is become a reality

We post shit

Yes you do.

neither funny nor interesting

Yes it is..

it's really an eyesore for an outsider/neutral

oh i'm sorry this thread doesn't comply with your standards. maybe there's not enough dick sucking going on in this thread like the other ones with the same fucking people in them!

in a more serious note, this happens so often the regulars seem to be okay with it. i mean, even raspb itted that she was just feeling kind of cranky and honestly she's the one who started the fight with the insults, not B1rd. also, nobody is stopping you from posting something else in this thread, you know. it's kind of the point of this thread. oh wait, you're new so i don't expect you to know.

This is the most polite way of me saying "fuck you"

oh i am so terrified of you right now

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

feminism is a good thing

Females are objectively inferior to males.

Medium quality bait!

did rasp lose it again

rasp pls


(please someone fill me in)

He was just being temperamental again.

Rasp is pretty childish for a 22-year old.

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

did rasp lose it again

rasp pls


(please someone fill me in)

just one post

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Rasp is pretty childish for a 22-year old.

it's like I hit the "emotionally unstable teen" phase seven years too late

Rasp, why do you like Nozomi when the only good feature about her is her two packed orbs. Kotori is better

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

it's like I hit the "emotionally unstable teen" phase seven years too late

The important part is that I think you can easily turn it around.

You have to begin thinking for yourself and forming your own opinions, rather than them being fed to you as they are. Once you have that in the bag, I think you're going to be just fine as a person.

The same thing can't be said about some other people here.

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Females are objectively inferior to males.

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

Trump released a couple of videos of Polish Hearthstone, and I have to say, it looks like an incredibly difficult language to speak. No clue how such a thing would've naturally evolved, but that'd be my English-speaker bias showing pretty heavily

S T R O N G E S T L A N G U A G E

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

it's like I hit the "emotionally unstable teen" phase seven years too late

The important part is that I think you can easily turn it around.

You have to begin thinking for yourself and forming your own opinions, rather than them being fed to you as they are. Once you have that in the bag, I think you're going to be just fine as a person.

The same thing can't be said about some other people here.

Step 1:
Realize that none of your feelings, thoughts or actions have an effect on the world as a whole. Teens are way too caught up with ideology. Cue Mahogany. Once you realize that you're not the center of everything, you also stop getting worked up so much. Just remind yourself that shit doesn't matter as much as you think it does.

Step 2:
Avoid turning into a cynical bastard. Yeah, it certainly doesn't matter to the world whether you're alive or not, but that doesn't mean that you can't care about your own life. If you're cynical about it means that you still care way too much. Just do you and be happy that you have a chance to make your life something fun and fulfilling.

Private life > Anything related to the world as a whole (ideology, politics, etc.)

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

Step 1:
Realize that none of your feelings, thoughts or actions have an effect on the world as a whole. Teens are way too caught up with ideology. Cue Mahogany. Once you realize that you're not the center of everything, you also stop getting worked up so much. Just remind yourself that shit doesn't matter as much as you think it does.

Step 2:
Avoid turning into a cynical bastard. Yeah, it certainly doesn't matter to the world whether you're alive or not, but that doesn't mean that you can't care about your own life. If you're cynical about it means that you still care way too much. Just do you and be happy that you have a chance to make your life something fun and fulfilling.

Private life > Anything related to the world as a whole (ideology, politics, etc.)

Thank god you're not the person receiving calls on suicide lines, cus that would be homocide

But credits to you for attempting

I don't think being cynical is that bad.

That being said, I don't think it's as black and white as you make it out to be. Your private life very much ties in with the outside world. Being an edgy shut-in won't help you understand shit and thus won't advance your character as a whole.
To become wiser and better as a person, you absolutely NEED to interact with the outside world and place your ideas out there.

Being an edgy shut-in is the complete opposite of what "taking care of your private life" looks like. Taking care of your private life includes but isn't limited to:
- getting educated
- having a stable job
- having an intimate, healthy relationship
- filling your free time with social activities and other stuff that you enjoy

Maybe "private life" was the wrong term here. I meant taking care of your own issues instead of trying to save the world.

I was talking about people that are deeply cynical, to a degree where it affects their ability to function. People that would feel very hopeles without their cynicism.

Dzyń dzyń co tam morda u ciebie

Ebe ebe
Ebe ebe ebe

Blitzfrog wrote: 2a3s

Thank god you're not the person receiving calls on suicide lines, cus that would be homocide

But credits to you for attempting

If Railey's the end of the process then you're the start of it.

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

Being an edgy shut-in is the complete opposite of what "taking care of your private life" looks like. Taking care of your private life includes but isn't limited to:
- getting educated
- having a stable job
- having an intimate, healthy relationship
- filling your free time with social activities and other stuff that you enjoy

Maybe "private life" was the wrong term here. I meant taking care of your own issues instead of trying to save the world.

I was talking about people that are deeply cynical, to a degree where it affects their ability to function. People that would feel very hopeles without their cynicism.

Yeah, it was a misunderstanding, then. Any kind of thing driven too far is an illness, including being cynical. Why did you mention that specific thing in the first place?

Define "saving the world"? I still stand by the statement that a person without a proper connection to the world is not a wiser person for being so.

One must focus on oneself as much as they need to focus on making sure the world around them is in order. We are all tied in one way or another, so having the goal of inward perfection is impossible without the "help" of others. Your character is built by your experiences of this world and the actions you have taken to change it.

railey if you really think trying to get people to be better people is too idealistic then you're the one who is cynical here

I'm going to make some examples to illustrate my points instead of talking about it in solely general .

The maxim is: If it doesn't affect you, or if you can't affect it, do not get involved.
You can extend that to others if you're feeling particularly altruistic, but the principle stays the same. (if it doesn't affect others..)


Hateful person online
- Does some hateful guy online immediately affect you? Only if you let him.
- Can you immediately and meaningfully affect him (aka: Could you change his mind?). If you're Mahogany: Clearly no.

Therefore: Hands off, go and do something more meaningful.


Politics
- Do Politics affect you? Yes.
- Can you immediately and meaningfully affect politics? You can vote, but your vote's worth is equal to the likelihood of your vote changing the outcome of the election, which is pretty much 0.

Voting also comes at almost 0 cost, so you might do it anyway, but you might also not do it and that'd be fine. 0-cost 0-impact actions don't really matter.
It follows that reading about politics would be equally useless unless you do it for a different reason than just being able to vote "better". Or arguing about it online and getting very emotional in the process. However: These two come at a cost, so...

Don't bother unless you plan a career in politics, or if you try to become a public figure to have a greater impact etc.



That should clear things up. It's also very basic common sense. Basically: Your ideals are useless if they fail to make an impact, Mahogany. And I'm pretty sure that nothing you ever did ever had an impact on B1rd, so why do you try so hard. You wasted like 500 hours getting mad at B1rd, insulting him and trying to change his mind. Get out and do something more useful.
Your own life is where things actually impact you and where you can actually make an impact. That's what you should turn most of your attention towards. Not politics, not the news, and especially not some people that give you a hard time online.

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

That should clear things up. It's also very basic common sense. Basically: Your ideals are useless if they fail to make an impact, Mahogany. And I'm pretty sure that nothing you ever did ever had an impact on B1rd, so why do you try so hard. You wasted like 500 hours getting mad at B1rd, insulting him and trying to change his mind. Get out and do something more useful.

I have never tried to impact b1rd - only point out how stupid his shit is so nobody else gets tricked into believing his bullshit. Some people are beyond help but he's still writing stupid shit that other people will read.

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

- Does some hateful guy online immediately affect you? Only if you let him.

Shit spreads if you let it, so yes, it does have an impact. I'm not going to literally sit here and let people be hateful if I can provide a counter point so that targeted people don't feel as marginalized.

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

Your own life is where things actually impact you and where you can actually make an impact. That's what you should turn most of your attention towards. Not politics, not the news, and especially not some people that give you a hard time online.

You do understand that I'm paying plenty of attention to stuff in my own life too, right? I can do both things at once.
Not to mention, the internet has a lot of influence in a lot of people's lives.

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

- Does some hateful guy online immediately affect you? Only if you let him.

Shit spreads if you let it, so yes, it does have an impact. I'm not going to literally sit here and let people be hateful if I can provide a counter point so that targeted people don't feel as marginalized.

our hero