yeah that's why I don't delete denizen
forum
we can't figure out what to do with denizen lol (we ended up figuring out) 2n6549
posted
Total Posts
110
What? Patatita? Scared from hate? This isn't patatita, who are you. Where is our patatitaPatatitta wrote: 5t25
I would like to but people won't let meScyla wrote: 1d6q5d
Remove it from existence
1- as kobold said, no point in timegate denizen announcementssametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
1. ok then, maybe just change how often denizenshit is rewarded, a week would be far too short and a month would be far too long. maybe new denizen every 15 days?Patatitta wrote: 5t25
1- So if a lot of people ed OT at the same time, we would have to choose to delay the denizen annoucement of some people because there is a denizen cap per month?, that doesn't seem like a good idea, less when you consider ot may grow in the futuersametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
i will try to fix those questions
1. in order to qualify for a denizenship, you must have 8 months of straight activity within OT. every month, new person gets denizen
2. denizenship needs an actual definition. i cant think of one rn, but im sure you guys could because you're an actual team and im just one guy. what you could also do is make multiple definitions and have a vote on which is the definitive definition, which would fix the problem of nobody agreeing on what denizenship is
3. i do not understand this. do you mean that there's not the same amount of denizens in each gen? do you mean that people from older times being mixed in with people from current times?
4. see the second sentence of number one
5. dont understand, do you mean people jumping from generation to generation (like samx500 jumping from gen 7 to gen 6), if thats the case, dont allow that to happen unless a person truly deserves to jump to an older generation
6. people have sort of put this idea of denizen being very important, so maybe clear that up? also the whole system's inconsistency can also contribute to the problem. also, the people who choose denizens should really think twice before adding a denizen, because simply adding a person without any actual thought will contribute to the inconsistency issue (cough cough blushing issue cough cough)
good luck fixing the system i guess
2- I mean yeah that's what we're discussing but we cant find a solution
3- read the full thread for more info, but TLDR is that the requirements for denizen have changed over the ages and older denizens have not been adapted to it, so a gen 3 denizen may not acutally qualify in gen 10, which leads to a lot of problems
4- fair
5- no, I mean the switch from gen 9 to gen 10 and stuff like that
6- I mean, even if I try hard to make denizen less prestigious, due to all of the oldfags who will return over time and abraker restless campaign to make denizen a really cool thing, it wouldn't be much of a help tbh
2. work hard mf
3. you can't really do much about this. time has changed the denizen system, so unless you wanna remove the older denizens and continue with the new selection process or remove the new denizens and go back to the old selection process, (which would cause alot of drama and confusion one way or the other) there's not much possible to fix this.
4. how tf do i argue with "fair"
5. you guys should decide how long a generation lasts for
6. oldfags come and go from what ive seen, i wouldnt worry too much. as for abraker you'll just have to ignore him i guess
2- that's what i'm doing
3- point is that if how denizen used to work was different on the past than it was now, and our definition of denizen has changed over time, with the past not beind adjusted or even clarifying it has been adjusted, people would believe that the old denizens have been chosen under the current rule, and even if we clarified it has been changed, under the modern definition of denizen, they wouldn't be denizens which would make the entire history preservation perspective of the thread be totally useless outside the last couple generations
4- you don't, i'm agreeing with you
5- and we cant really agree on anything and that is why i'm making thos thread
6- idk it's hard and people would hate me if I tried to remove prestige from denizen
petition for the potato man to start a mass-gencide on otScyla wrote: 1d6q5d
What? Patatita? Scared from hate? This isn't patatita, who are you. Where is our patatitaPatatitta wrote: 5t25
I would like to but people won't let meScyla wrote: 1d6q5d
Remove it from existence
1- as kobold said, no point in timegate denizen announcementssametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
1. ok then, maybe just change how often denizenshit is rewarded, a week would be far too short and a month would be far too long. maybe new denizen every 15 days?Patatitta wrote: 5t25
1- So if a lot of people ed OT at the same time, we would have to choose to delay the denizen annoucement of some people because there is a denizen cap per month?, that doesn't seem like a good idea, less when you consider ot may grow in the futuersametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
i will try to fix those questions
1. in order to qualify for a denizenship, you must have 8 months of straight activity within OT. every month, new person gets denizen
2. denizenship needs an actual definition. i cant think of one rn, but im sure you guys could because you're an actual team and im just one guy. what you could also do is make multiple definitions and have a vote on which is the definitive definition, which would fix the problem of nobody agreeing on what denizenship is
3. i do not understand this. do you mean that there's not the same amount of denizens in each gen? do you mean that people from older times being mixed in with people from current times?
4. see the second sentence of number one
5. dont understand, do you mean people jumping from generation to generation (like samx500 jumping from gen 7 to gen 6), if thats the case, dont allow that to happen unless a person truly deserves to jump to an older generation
6. people have sort of put this idea of denizen being very important, so maybe clear that up? also the whole system's inconsistency can also contribute to the problem. also, the people who choose denizens should really think twice before adding a denizen, because simply adding a person without any actual thought will contribute to the inconsistency issue (cough cough blushing issue cough cough)
good luck fixing the system i guess
2- I mean yeah that's what we're discussing but we cant find a solution
3- read the full thread for more info, but TLDR is that the requirements for denizen have changed over the ages and older denizens have not been adapted to it, so a gen 3 denizen may not acutally qualify in gen 10, which leads to a lot of problems
4- fair
5- no, I mean the switch from gen 9 to gen 10 and stuff like that
6- I mean, even if I try hard to make denizen less prestigious, due to all of the oldfags who will return over time and abraker restless campaign to make denizen a really cool thing, it wouldn't be much of a help tbh
2. work hard mf
3. you can't really do much about this. time has changed the denizen system, so unless you wanna remove the older denizens and continue with the new selection process or remove the new denizens and go back to the old selection process, (which would cause alot of drama and confusion one way or the other) there's not much possible to fix this.
4. how tf do i argue with "fair"
5. you guys should decide how long a generation lasts for
6. oldfags come and go from what ive seen, i wouldnt worry too much. as for abraker you'll just have to ignore him i guess
2- that's what i'm doing
3- point is that if how denizen used to work was different on the past than it was now, and our definition of denizen has changed over time, with the past not beind adjusted or even clarifying it has been adjusted, people would believe that the old denizens have been chosen under the current rule, and even if we clarified it has been changed, under the modern definition of denizen, they wouldn't be denizens which would make the entire history preservation perspective of the thread be totally useless outside the last couple generations
4- you don't, i'm agreeing with you
5- and we cant really agree on anything and that is why i'm making thos thread
6- idk it's hard and people would hate me if I tried to remove prestige from denizen
nah don't worry i've got a solution and i'm going to push for it hard nowScyla wrote: 1d6q5d
What? Patatita? Scared from hate? This isn't patatita, who are you. Where is our patatitaPatatitta wrote: 5t25
I would like to but people won't let meScyla wrote: 1d6q5d
Remove it from existence
1- as kobold said, no point in timegate denizen announcementssametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
1. ok then, maybe just change how often denizenshit is rewarded, a week would be far too short and a month would be far too long. maybe new denizen every 15 days?Patatitta wrote: 5t25
1- So if a lot of people ed OT at the same time, we would have to choose to delay the denizen annoucement of some people because there is a denizen cap per month?, that doesn't seem like a good idea, less when you consider ot may grow in the futuersametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
i will try to fix those questions
1. in order to qualify for a denizenship, you must have 8 months of straight activity within OT. every month, new person gets denizen
2. denizenship needs an actual definition. i cant think of one rn, but im sure you guys could because you're an actual team and im just one guy. what you could also do is make multiple definitions and have a vote on which is the definitive definition, which would fix the problem of nobody agreeing on what denizenship is
3. i do not understand this. do you mean that there's not the same amount of denizens in each gen? do you mean that people from older times being mixed in with people from current times?
4. see the second sentence of number one
5. dont understand, do you mean people jumping from generation to generation (like samx500 jumping from gen 7 to gen 6), if thats the case, dont allow that to happen unless a person truly deserves to jump to an older generation
6. people have sort of put this idea of denizen being very important, so maybe clear that up? also the whole system's inconsistency can also contribute to the problem. also, the people who choose denizens should really think twice before adding a denizen, because simply adding a person without any actual thought will contribute to the inconsistency issue (cough cough blushing issue cough cough)
good luck fixing the system i guess
2- I mean yeah that's what we're discussing but we cant find a solution
3- read the full thread for more info, but TLDR is that the requirements for denizen have changed over the ages and older denizens have not been adapted to it, so a gen 3 denizen may not acutally qualify in gen 10, which leads to a lot of problems
4- fair
5- no, I mean the switch from gen 9 to gen 10 and stuff like that
6- I mean, even if I try hard to make denizen less prestigious, due to all of the oldfags who will return over time and abraker restless campaign to make denizen a really cool thing, it wouldn't be much of a help tbh
2. work hard mf
3. you can't really do much about this. time has changed the denizen system, so unless you wanna remove the older denizens and continue with the new selection process or remove the new denizens and go back to the old selection process, (which would cause alot of drama and confusion one way or the other) there's not much possible to fix this.
4. how tf do i argue with "fair"
5. you guys should decide how long a generation lasts for
6. oldfags come and go from what ive seen, i wouldnt worry too much. as for abraker you'll just have to ignore him i guess
2- that's what i'm doing
3- point is that if how denizen used to work was different on the past than it was now, and our definition of denizen has changed over time, with the past not beind adjusted or even clarifying it has been adjusted, people would believe that the old denizens have been chosen under the current rule, and even if we clarified it has been changed, under the modern definition of denizen, they wouldn't be denizens which would make the entire history preservation perspective of the thread be totally useless outside the last couple generations
4- you don't, i'm agreeing with you
5- and we cant really agree on anything and that is why i'm making thos thread
6- idk it's hard and people would hate me if I tried to remove prestige from denizen
kinda a mix of what samedtze and reyalp said
gens as they currently stand are no more, instead, each gens correspond to a different ruling of denizen, so all the denizens that got added while the requirement was 3 months would all fall under the same gen, all the ones that required contribution would fall under the same gen, etc. We will start a new gen that just requires of 8 months and 500 posts and nothing more
that would:
While not consistent over time, we represent ot history better by showing how the definition for denizen has changed over time
We abolish lore or just subjectivity being the sole reason for like half the generation switches
No gatekeeping or favoritism happening in denizen selection
It's a good system on the long run
Everyone gets what denizen is as it would be explained on each gens description
no subjectivity = no drama
ahhhh its time for meeeeeeeeeee.
patatitta, being leader and making decisions that not only reflect you, but impact an entire ecosystem means that your choices and decisions will not be liked and some people will vehemently hate you.
patatitta, being leader and making decisions that not only reflect you, but impact an entire ecosystem means that your choices and decisions will not be liked and some people will vehemently hate you.
- The issue pertaining to not enough people getting denizen or its "too slow":
-- Within the community, you should elect a cabinet of people to do this. Their primary role? Selecting, voting, and dishing out denizen. You simply approve or deny. Along with what train guy said: increase the time from monthly to about every 2 weeks, if there is no one to give denizen to then dont worry about it, youll get the next one next time.
-- Within the community, you should elect a cabinet of people to do this. Their primary role? Selecting, voting, and dishing out denizen. You simply approve or deny. Along with what train guy said: increase the time from monthly to about every 2 weeks, if there is no one to give denizen to then dont worry about it, youll get the next one next time.
- The issue regarding what denizen means:
-- This is a hot topic. Pretty much everyone that has the title sees some value in it or some type of prestige, of course no one that had to gain prestige is wanting it taken away without either them getting compensation for it or it being reinstituted. It is, however, the role of the government to officially determine their standards and expectations of denizens. As it stands, there are a ton of denizens that dont come back because they have left osu, aged out, or are simply just not on the game anymore.
--- So... are they denizen? not really, but they had an impact on the beginning of OT and its happenings. These people are called founders/makers/forefathers, etc. Make them have a specified honorary role (because you can do that).
---- To rework the system means you will be Sisyphus. Though you want this thing fleshed out and changed, somehow, someway so go against the grain and propose what YOU want to do. Whether people like it or not.
----- What Does Denizen Mean to You?:
- Its an honorary role. This seems to be one of the more valid reasons for people not getting and such. Removing the post count requirement, removing anything that is objectively able to obtain and making it a "You get it because you made an impact on OT" This can range from 1 post, that matters a shit ton, like idk "Art of OT" or "OT! Library", because those posts are impactful, etc. or it can be getting 300 posts in 8 months type procedures where people recognize their name and can point out what they primarily do in OT, like what they post, content, and their general behaviors.
-- This is a hot topic. Pretty much everyone that has the title sees some value in it or some type of prestige, of course no one that had to gain prestige is wanting it taken away without either them getting compensation for it or it being reinstituted. It is, however, the role of the government to officially determine their standards and expectations of denizens. As it stands, there are a ton of denizens that dont come back because they have left osu, aged out, or are simply just not on the game anymore.
--- So... are they denizen? not really, but they had an impact on the beginning of OT and its happenings. These people are called founders/makers/forefathers, etc. Make them have a specified honorary role (because you can do that).
---- To rework the system means you will be Sisyphus. Though you want this thing fleshed out and changed, somehow, someway so go against the grain and propose what YOU want to do. Whether people like it or not.
----- What Does Denizen Mean to You?:
- Its an honorary role. This seems to be one of the more valid reasons for people not getting and such. Removing the post count requirement, removing anything that is objectively able to obtain and making it a "You get it because you made an impact on OT" This can range from 1 post, that matters a shit ton, like idk "Art of OT" or "OT! Library", because those posts are impactful, etc. or it can be getting 300 posts in 8 months type procedures where people recognize their name and can point out what they primarily do in OT, like what they post, content, and their general behaviors.
this has probably been said but here is my second take
make denizenship purely subjective. the catch is that it has absolutely zero perks attached to it, that way, denizenship turns to what i described in my first post, just a way to people that were/are a part of the community. with this, all the problems go away, because to be a "denizen" is no longer anything special and people stop caring whether they are denizens or not.
from what i understand, you are trying to change the core principles of denizenship itself, to transform it from a subjective to an objective system. i also want to add the fact that by making a clear, objective requirement for becoming denizen, like "300 posts" or whatever, it is like encouraging people to make a lot of posts, most of will probably not be of good quality, just to get to the denizen title. having a subjective requirement, such as "be memorable" or "be recognizable" encourages higher quality and overall makes the board more enjoyable for everyone.
make denizenship purely subjective. the catch is that it has absolutely zero perks attached to it, that way, denizenship turns to what i described in my first post, just a way to people that were/are a part of the community. with this, all the problems go away, because to be a "denizen" is no longer anything special and people stop caring whether they are denizens or not.
from what i understand, you are trying to change the core principles of denizenship itself, to transform it from a subjective to an objective system. i also want to add the fact that by making a clear, objective requirement for becoming denizen, like "300 posts" or whatever, it is like encouraging people to make a lot of posts, most of will probably not be of good quality, just to get to the denizen title. having a subjective requirement, such as "be memorable" or "be recognizable" encourages higher quality and overall makes the board more enjoyable for everyone.
Blushing wrote: 5x575
ahhhh its time for meeeeeeeeeee.
patatitta, being leader and making decisions that not only reflect you, but impact an entire ecosystem means that your choices and decisions will not be liked and some people will vehemently hate you.
---- To rework the system means you will be Sisyphus. Though you want this thing fleshed out and changed, somehow, someway so go against the grain and propose what YOU want to do. Whether people like it or not.
burgernfat wrote: 6p3sh
make denizenship purely subjective. the catch is that it has absolutely zero perks attached to it, that way, denizenship turns to what i described in my first post, just a way to people that were/are a part of the community.
removing objective milestones for denizenship allows for it to truly be the "honorary" and prestigious title that everyone wants, or seems to desire.
If OT!Gov is abolished... nothign changes.
It would be as if it was last year or the year before. This is the only government that has proposed meaningful change and has been useful to some degree, whether you like the changes or not.
Im sorry that you dont like what patatitta is going to do or is trying to do to denizenship. You lot are so attached to a honorary title in a rhythm clicking game for a forum that is mostly shit post and shenanigans. People being gatekept from participating in certain events or activities because they dont have it is insane, to name a few: Corne's Collab, OT elections, Pretty much any Manishh event. It has become less about "hey this dude is historic!" and more like spongebob trying to get into the salty spitoon, its humorous.
There are actual things that can be done, like reducing the objective criteria so people can't complain about how they meet a criteria and it is strictly based on overall feeling. Post quality, amount, and frequency can be helpful factors yes, but to meet a criteria of like 300 posts in 8 months is stupid because I can just spam the front page with remotely relevant posts and be fine and then get denizen based on that, it just isnt a good metric. A good metric would be to genuinely ask the council "What do you from blushing without needing to look at their OT history?" If they sayu negative things or "not much" then its pretty clear I was not historic, ya know?
create a separate entity of the government that doesnt report to them but sends them their list of people for denizen then the president, and only the president, signs off on them: yes or no.
patatitta, if people genuinely hate you for a title that holds too many meanings behind it being taken away from them, then they need to touch grass and that it really doesnt matter this much and it isnt that deep. Its not as if denizen allows them any privilege outside roleplaying in certain threads.
Sisyphus finds meaning and life in what he does. Sometimes the struggle is better than the reward. Seeing something come to fruition that you have fought tooth and nail for is arguably what a politician should do, whether you like their ideals or not.keremaru wrote: 3r6e2u
stuff in pink
If OT!Gov is abolished... nothign changes.
It would be as if it was last year or the year before. This is the only government that has proposed meaningful change and has been useful to some degree, whether you like the changes or not.
Im sorry that you dont like what patatitta is going to do or is trying to do to denizenship. You lot are so attached to a honorary title in a rhythm clicking game for a forum that is mostly shit post and shenanigans. People being gatekept from participating in certain events or activities because they dont have it is insane, to name a few: Corne's Collab, OT elections, Pretty much any Manishh event. It has become less about "hey this dude is historic!" and more like spongebob trying to get into the salty spitoon, its humorous.
There are actual things that can be done, like reducing the objective criteria so people can't complain about how they meet a criteria and it is strictly based on overall feeling. Post quality, amount, and frequency can be helpful factors yes, but to meet a criteria of like 300 posts in 8 months is stupid because I can just spam the front page with remotely relevant posts and be fine and then get denizen based on that, it just isnt a good metric. A good metric would be to genuinely ask the council "What do you from blushing without needing to look at their OT history?" If they sayu negative things or "not much" then its pretty clear I was not historic, ya know?
create a separate entity of the government that doesnt report to them but sends them their list of people for denizen then the president, and only the president, signs off on them: yes or no.
patatitta, if people genuinely hate you for a title that holds too many meanings behind it being taken away from them, then they need to touch grass and that it really doesnt matter this much and it isnt that deep. Its not as if denizen allows them any privilege outside roleplaying in certain threads.
OF COURSE I'M ATTACHED TO A RHYTHM GAME FORUM, HERE PPL ACCEPT I HAVE AN OBSESSION WITH THE TRUE OWNER IF THE WORLDBlushing wrote: 5x575
removing objective milestones for denizenship allows for it to truly be the "honorary" and prestigious title that everyone wants, or seems to desire.
Sisyphus finds meaning and life in what he does. Sometimes the struggle is better than the reward. Seeing something come to fruition that you have fought tooth and nail for is arguably what a politician should do, whether you like their ideals or not.keremaru wrote: 3r6e2u
stuff in pink
If OT!Gov is abolished... nothign changes.
It would be as if it was last year or the year before. This is the only government that has proposed meaningful change and has been useful to some degree, whether you like the changes or not.
Im sorry that you dont like what patatitta is going to do or is trying to do to denizenship. You lot are so attached to a honorary title in a rhythm clicking game for a forum that is mostly shit post and shenanigans. People being gatekept from participating in certain events or activities because they dont have it is insane, to name a few: Corne's Collab, OT elections, Pretty much any Manishh event. It has become less about "hey this dude is historic!" and more like spongebob trying to get into the salty spitoon, its humorous.
There are actual things that can be done, like reducing the objective criteria so people can't complain about how they meet a criteria and it is strictly based on overall feeling. Post quality, amount, and frequency can be helpful factors yes, but to meet a criteria of like 300 posts in 8 months is stupid because I can just spam the front page with remotely relevant posts and be fine and then get denizen based on that, it just isnt a good metric. A good metric would be to genuinely ask the council "What do you from blushing without needing to look at their OT history?" If they sayu negative things or "not much" then its pretty clear I was not historic, ya know?
create a separate entity of the government that doesnt report to them but sends them their list of people for denizen then the president, and only the president, signs off on them: yes or no.
patatitta, if people genuinely hate you for a title that holds too many meanings behind it being taken away from them, then they need to touch grass and that it really doesnt matter this much and it isnt that deep. Its not as if denizen allows them any privilege outside roleplaying in certain threads.
Blushing wrote: 5x575
stuff that isn't annoying to readkeremaru wrote: 3r6e2u
stuff in pink
I'll it that gatekeeping activities to denizens only is pretty cringe, but I still stand by my opinion that it's basically a cool kids club. Though I was blindsided by just looking at the present OT and not taking a retrospect at what denizenship actually implied for everybody else, especially since I've had it for way too long. There is a problem with how denizenship is treated in OT, especially by people who view it as a prestigious status when it's nothing more than a "hey you're cool here's a title". There's way too much weight around denizenship as it stands, and after a rescoping of my previous stances, there is something that has to be done about the weight of denizenship. I'm still mainly against the whole eradication of the system, but after that 'honorary title' statement, I began to realize just how ively attached I was to something that I didn't really work all that hard for, in contrast to what people have to do now. To be fair, in OT at least, I'm nothing more than an old man trying to keep relevant in a landscape that's changed drastically from what I've been used to, for the better or otherwise.
Why is there so much complaints about Denizen now all of a sudden? This is like 10x the normal rate. Changing something is worse than not changing anything at all, you lot are just breaking something that was inherently subjective and messed up to begin with. Nothing can be fixed, it can only go down from here on.
Corne's collab allowed for active dwellers.Blushing wrote: 5x575
Im sorry that you dont like what patatitta is going to do or is trying to do to denizenship. You lot are so attached to a honorary title in a rhythm clicking game for a forum that is mostly shit post and shenanigans. People being gatekept from participating in certain events or activities because they dont have it is insane, to name a few: Corne's Collab, OT elections, Pretty much any Manishh event. It has become less about "hey this dude is historic!" and more like spongebob trying to get into the salty spitoon, its humorous.
OT elections sure, but it is something done for older dwellers (denizens).
Manishh events are rare and there are recent examples of his events that also allowed for everyone to enter (they flopped in general, but let's not talk about that).
i'm sorry but y'all are just plainly wrong and i'm kinda tired to actually respondBlushing wrote: 5x575
Literally biggest fuck you to someone that actually gave and you refused to just comment or even talk about it with me.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
too late we're probably just going to implement what I said earlier skill issue everyone
1- "Choose another team for selecting denizenship"
Those are tasks of the gov, but I was refeering more to if there should be a more systematic way to prevent us on sleeping on it or whateever
2- "What does denizenship mean?"
We have ended up on a definition that is more on the lines "someone who is in the OT community"
3- "making it not subjective is a bad idea"
For 90% of it's lifespan denizenship hasn't been subjective, the initial ruling by abraker only required 3 months of activity and nothing more, then it got reworked to require more time, and after that, ghouly reworked it to require some sort of contribution to OT, however, the parliament was slow and this basically wasn't enforced. So yeah, OT has NEVER had a subjective ruling over denizen and shit has always been fine. It also s our definition of denizen.
4- "It doesn't need change"
Excluding this one, in the last 4 years the denizen system has been reworked twice, and even after the latest rework, there has still been drama and complaints which were never solved, just ignored. Take for example the dramas surrounding the switches in generation. Not only that, but i'm trying to avoid things like the blushing situation happening again, where the parliament fucks up and then they make a poll to see if they undo their mistake, because they don't need a poll to actually run shit but they do need one to revert it apparently. This system should prevent a lot of the drama since it makes it harder for us the government to actually pull off things like that.
5- "You can't push this change or else there would be a revolution"
I said I was going to do this exact thing, and I got voted in by mayority, not only that, but then I ran the parliament elections, and the people who ended up winning mostly these ideas, if you're now mad about it, it's your fault.
6- You guys are really fucking biased.
Like really, i'm sorry blushing but I don't know if you aegree with me because you agree with my idea or because you think licking my asshole will grant you denizen, not only that but I feel people like ymir were already against me even from before this, so I don't know how seriously can I take the criticism torwards this. Whenever you consider a lot of the criticism is just missguided as I said with the "denizen is subjective!!!!" thing, I just can't take you seriously
We'll go through it.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
i'm sorry but y'all are just plainly wrong and i'm kinda tired to actually respondBlushing wrote: 5x575
Literally biggest fuck you to someone that actually gave and you refused to just comment or even talk about it with me.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
too late we're probably just going to implement what I said earlier skill issue everyone
1- "Choose another team for selecting denizenship"
Those are tasks of the gov, but I was refeering more to if there should be a more systematic way to prevent us on sleeping on it or whateever
2- "What does denizenship mean?"
We have ended up on a definition that is more on the lines "someone who is in the OT community"
3- "making it not subjective is a bad idea"
For 90% of it's lifespan denizenship hasn't been subjective, the initial ruling by abraker only required 3 months of activity and nothing more, then it got reworked to require more time, and after that, ghouly reworked it to require some sort of contribution to OT, however, the parliament was slow and this basically wasn't enforced. So yeah, OT has NEVER had a subjective ruling over denizen and shit has always been fine. It also s our definition of denizen.
4- "It doesn't need change"
Excluding this one, in the last 4 years the denizen system has been reworked twice, and even after the latest rework, there has still been drama and complaints which were never solved, just ignored. Take for example the dramas surrounding the switches in generation. Not only that, but i'm trying to avoid things like the blushing situation happening again, where the parliament fucks up and then they make a poll to see if they undo their mistake, because they don't need a poll to actually run shit but they do need one to revert it apparently. This system should prevent a lot of the drama since it makes it harder for us the government to actually pull off things like that.
5- "You can't push this change or else there would be a revolution"
I said I was going to do this exact thing, and I got voted in by mayority, not only that, but then I ran the parliament elections, and the people who ended up winning mostly these ideas, if you're now mad about it, it's your fault.
6- You guys are really fucking biased.
Like really, i'm sorry blushing but I don't know if you aegree with me because you agree with my idea or because you think licking my asshole will grant you denizen, not only that but I feel people like ymir were already against me even from before this, so I don't know how seriously can I take the criticism torwards this. Whenever you consider a lot of the criticism is just missguided as I said with the "denizen is subjective!!!!" thing, I just can't take you seriously
1. Systematic includes making another body so you dont sleep on it, I dont exactly understand why you are the rest of government are against this idea.
2. Ok at least there is a definition you guys are going to stick to.
3. objectivity is just going to ruin it because people can and will complain, but it sounds like your newer version of what you want is somewhat going into this way?
4. i've never said it didn't need change?
5. yes but you explicitly have said things about being "scared" or hesitant about how people will react to your change, I simply said you either do or don't. Whichever you do is something that someone isn't going to like so might as well do what you want to do.
6. If you think i'm going to brown nose you, you are sadly mistaken. You are asking the public about their opinions of a system. I have said multiple times I do not care about getting denizen, but that doesn't mean I can't give input on that.
My joke posts are very far and inbetween because Im not going to joke with the vast majority of players that I don't care about. If I am giving input on things in this subforum its because I am actually thinking and wanting conversation not you insinuating that i licking your asshole.
There is a certain jaded ideal you get from being within the group than being outside, and that is what I wanted to bring to attention. With every group: GMT, NAT, LVD, BN, DEV, etc. there is a certain aspect that everyone becomes accustomed to and that you don't individually see issues that the outside can see or want to bring to attention.
All i wanted was a conversation and I posted both of those in due time for you to reply, but then you simply had to take it in a way that I'm "licking your asshole" for a title that grants nothing. Be so fucking for real. If im brown nosing anything it is not for this subforum, and especially not for you.
done community/forums/topics/1021462Polyspora wrote: 4i695
Uh @abraker we should probably make a constitution
B0ii wrote: 33m13
well... is there one that ACTUALLY PUTS SOMETHING ABOUT DENIZENSHIP INTO SET STONE?Nuuskamuikkunen wrote: 6f1wj
There is.Polyspora wrote: 4i695
Uh @abraker we should probably make a constitution
V. Denizens may acquire denizenship if they fulfill the current requirements stated by the Royal Society, which can be found atuntil community/forums/topics/1276058
community/forums/topics/615764
03/19/2021So basically right now, officially, parliament votes on who becomes denizen. Heeyyy elections matter!
Time requirement for denizenship increased from 2 months to 8 months
03/19/2021
Remove the 10 page post history requirement to becoming a denizen.
03/19/2021
Formation of the DAT:
Future OT denizens will have to atleast be in OT for 8 months before their denizenship can be reviewed by the Denizen Approval Team (DAT).
Exceptions to this rule will be decided by the DAT on certain specific cases, when the 8 months requirement is not suitable to judge an individual's denizenship.
The DAT will consists of current Parliament and will hold votes regarding the inclusion of a denizen to OT.
Once every 1.5 to 2 months, or whenever there's an influx of new denizens, the DAT will hold meetings to review new denizenships.
So you are saying there has been multiple breaking of constitution. Election not being happen last year and the requirement for voting in the election being changed.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
done community/forums/topics/1021462Polyspora wrote: 4i695
Uh @abraker we should probably make a constitution
Nobody enforces it so yeahManishh wrote: 2k5q58
So you are saying there has been multiple breaking of constitution. Election not being happen last year and the requirement for voting in the election being changed.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
done community/forums/topics/1021462Polyspora wrote: 4i695
Uh @abraker we should probably make a constitution
You are saying like it was not your responsibility to apply it last yearPolyspora wrote: 4i695
Nobody enforces it so yeahManishh wrote: 2k5q58
So you are saying there has been multiple breaking of constitution. Election not being happen last year and the requirement for voting in the election being changed.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
done community/forums/topics/1021462Polyspora wrote: 4i695
Uh @abraker we should probably make a constitution
It wasn't, we weren't even the real parliament. Only promise we made was to continue denizenship.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
You are saying like it was not your responsibility to apply it last yearPolyspora wrote: 4i695
Nobody enforces it so yeahManishh wrote: 2k5q58
So you are saying there has been multiple breaking of constitution. Election not being happen last year and the requirement for voting in the election being changed.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
done community/forums/topics/1021462Polyspora wrote: 4i695
Uh @abraker we should probably make a constitution
So far from this thread alone, without counting the president, I can see that there are
(The others are either neutral or I don't know)
((Please correct me if I have made a mistake))
5 progressives (keremaru) against any changes OR for just a few corrections.(The others are either neutral or I don't know)
((Please correct me if I have made a mistake))
I was never for the abolitionhis everything wrote: x243s
So far from this thread alone, without counting the president, I can see that there are5 progressives(keremaru) against any changes OR for just a few corrections.
(The others are either neutral or I don't know)
((Please correct me if I have made a mistake))
I'm the enlightened centrist that sits in the middle and doesn't thinkhis everything wrote: x243s
So far from this thread alone, without counting the president, I can see that there are5 progressives(keremaru) against any changes OR for just a few corrections.
(The others are either neutral or I don't know)
((Please correct me if I have made a mistake))
man fuck this government shit, I just wanna make silly yet deep threads with interesting stories and lorehis everything wrote: x243s
So far from this thread alone, without counting the president, I can see that there are5 progressives(keremaru) against any changes OR for just a few corrections.
(The others are either neutral or I don't know)
((Please correct me if I have made a mistake))
"OR the reform"Corne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p
I was never for the abolitionhis everything wrote: x243s
So far from this thread alone, without counting the president, I can see that there are5 progressives(keremaru) against any changes OR for just a few corrections.
(The others are either neutral or I don't know)
((Please correct me if I have made a mistake))
I absolutely didn't put you in that category just because you lost denizen, however, as you are the person who has proposed the most changes in this thread (even though Patatitta doesn't care or something), it would be illogical of me to say that you're not in favor of progress. Sorry for the inconvenience I've caused!Blushing wrote: 5x575
I am consistently wanting change to it, just because I am suggesting non-radical changes doesn't mean im conservative.
Any major change I have attempted to talk about just leads people into thinking I want change because I lost denizen or because I want it that bad. Idk.
update: we figured it out
no one is stopping you, denizen thread being one way or another shouldn't affect your threadsB0ii wrote: 33m13
man fuck this government shit, I just wanna make silly yet deep threads with interesting stories and lorehis everything wrote: x243s
So far from this thread alone, without counting the president, I can see that there are5 progressives(keremaru) against any changes OR for just a few corrections.
(The others are either neutral or I don't know)
((Please correct me if I have made a mistake))
i literally dont care i just dislike potatohis everything wrote: x243s
So far from this thread alone, without counting the president, I can see that there are5 progressives(keremaru) against any changes OR for just a few corrections.
(The others are either neutral or I don't know)
((Please correct me if I have made a mistake))
nah cuz im gonna be real i just wanna have fun here lmaohis everything wrote: x243s
So far from this thread alone, without counting the president, I can see that there are5 progressives(keremaru) against any changes OR for just a few corrections.
(The others are either neutral or I don't know)
((Please correct me if I have made a mistake))
[ Rynn ] wrote: 4f5l6o
nah cuz im gonna be real i just wanna have fun here lmaohis everything wrote: x243s
So far from this thread alone, without counting the president, I can see that there are5 progressives(keremaru) against any changes OR for just a few corrections.
(The others are either neutral or I don't know)
((Please correct me if I have made a mistake))