Why is "not voting anyone off" always a "scum suggestion" ? What if shin is actually not capping
because not voting anyone off helps scum in the long runNotRaffi wrote: 171b11
Why is "not voting anyone off" always a "scum suggestion" ?
Then vote me off before I get a stroke. Scum cant risk with role claim like this becauseNotRaffi wrote: 171b11
What if shin is actually not capping
So in mean time can you tell me how this game workDCT wrote: 4w3f2c
Should no one replace manishmathur in the next 36 hours, he get to keep his slot.DCT wrote: 4w3f2c
Already prodded once, and put his slot up for replacement after confirming that a moderation error happened.Julian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
He hasn't made a single post, why isn't he prodded?
(Repeat) Replacing manishmathur. Sorry for g you up by mistake.manishmathur wrote: 49y5n
bro when the fuck did I participated and i dont even know wtf is newd3
community/forums/posts/1062604manishmathur wrote: 49y5n
So in mean time can you tell me how this game workDCT wrote: 4w3f2c
Should no one replace manishmathur in the next 36 hours, he get to keep his slot.DCT wrote: 4w3f2c
Already prodded once, and put his slot up for replacement after confirming that a moderation error happened.Julian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
He hasn't made a single post, why isn't he prodded?
(Repeat) Replacing manishmathur. Sorry for g you up by mistake.manishmathur wrote: 49y5n
bro when the fuck did I participated and i dont even know wtf is newd3
I understand fully nopeabraker wrote: 6cx2d
community/forums/posts/1062604manishmathur wrote: 49y5n
So in mean time can you tell me how this game workDCT wrote: 4w3f2c
Should no one replace manishmathur in the next 36 hours, he get to keep his slot.DCT wrote: 4w3f2c
Already prodded once, and put his slot up for replacement after confirming that a moderation error happened.Julian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
He hasn't made a single post, why isn't he prodded?
(Repeat) Replacing manishmathur. Sorry for g you up by mistake.manishmathur wrote: 49y5n
bro when the fuck did I participated and i dont even know wtf is newd3
sounds like youre begging for the other PR at night to prove your innocence.ShinRun wrote: 4p6j2
The other PR should be a cop or tracker, the person with the ability could literally use the ability on me to see if I’m lying or not. A cop should be able to see my alignment and tracker can see if I protected someone with my ability. Worst case scenario, mafia kill me.
bad idea, you are basically saying to other PR to roleclaim day 2ShinRun wrote: 4p6j2
The other PR should be a cop or tracker, the person with the ability could literally use the ability on me to see if I’m lying or not. A cop should be able to see my alignment and tracker can see if I protected someone with my ability. Worst case scenario, mafia kill me.
If we vote out a town today and mafia kill tonight, it would be 5-2igorsprite wrote: 6x186x
bad idea, you are basically saying to other PR to roleclaim day 2ShinRun wrote: 4p6j2
The other PR should be a cop or tracker, the person with the ability could literally use the ability on me to see if I’m lying or not. A cop should be able to see my alignment and tracker can see if I protected someone with my ability. Worst case scenario, mafia kill me.
I think my main reasoning is that a lot of people in this game have either been extremely inactive or have otherwise given very little input other than posting. Those people are more likely to go under the radar when it comes time to choose someone to vote out (and choosing someone to vote out d1 is often just a random selection). If one or both scum are inactive during this period, they likely won't be considered as someone "worthy" of voting out. For example (and this is not a serious accusation, so please do not take it as one), what if Manish or whoever ends up in Manish's slot is scum? We would have literally no way of telling at this point, considering he knows absolutely zilch about how to play mafia and would likely show no suspicious activity. When it comes time for people to make a random vote or a vote solely based off of suspicion, they would likely leave him out of their considerations, considering he has said almost nothing besides that he doesn't know the game at all. Because of that, I think it's risky to vote anyone before we get everyone actively participating and showing their logic.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
@ghoulybits
You say "I feel like voting someone off carries a lot more risk than it does reward right now". Is that just a guts feeling or is there any actual reasoning behind it?
so we should vote for who is less activeghoulybits wrote: v2x52
I think my main reasoning is that a lot of people in this game have either been extremely inactive or have otherwise given very little input other than posting. Those people are more likely to go under the radar when it comes time to choose someone to vote out (and choosing someone to vote out d1 is often just a random selection). If one or both scum are inactive during this period, they likely won't be considered as someone "worthy" of voting out. For example (and this is not a serious accusation, so please do not take it as one), what if Manish or whoever ends up in Manish's slot is scum? We would have literally no way of telling at this point, considering he knows absolutely zilch about how to play mafia and would likely show no suspicious activity. When it comes time for people to make a random vote or a vote solely based off of suspicion, they would likely leave him out of their considerations, considering he has said almost nothing besides that he doesn't know the game at all. Because of that, I think it's risky to vote anyone before we get everyone actively participating and showing their logic.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
@ghoulybits
You say "I feel like voting someone off carries a lot more risk than it does reward right now". Is that just a guts feeling or is there any actual reasoning behind it?
In addition, when it comes to voting out someone who's been more active in this game, I specifically have qualms with attempting to vote ShinRun, as I think that he's 1. an idiot who would actually roleclaim d1 and 2. most likely the town doctor. Therefore, that combined with the lack of any evidence to draw upon means that I would rather not vote someone out without an extremely compelling reason.
This is probably just word soup, so let me know if I need to clarify anything.
The thought of you dropping roleclaim idea sounds pretty scum.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
I can't believe we are arguing over when to roleclaim
How about we do scum hunting?
Because it's too early to even consider that. It takes away focus from what we should be doing: SCUM HUNTINGJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
The thought of you dropping roleclaim idea sounds pretty scum.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
I can't believe we are arguing over when to roleclaim
How about we do scum hunting?
Vote: abraker
Then please explain why you are voting ShinRun so early. If they are truly town doctor, then us eliminating them means scum won't have to kill them and will be able to try and kill the second PR.igorsprite wrote: 6x186x
hey, i'm reformed nowsamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
I am most suspicious of igorsprite right now because they are acting very cooperative, which from previous game I have learned that they are mostly cooperative when being scum.![]()
oke, i will wait and see what happens.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
Then please explain why you are voting ShinRun so early. If they are truly town doctor, then us eliminating them means scum won't have to kill them and will be able to try and kill the second PR.igorsprite wrote: 6x186x
hey, i'm reformed nowsamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
I am most suspicious of igorsprite right now because they are acting very cooperative, which from previous game I have learned that they are mostly cooperative when being scum.![]()
And if they are scum, they will be mostly revealed tommorow by them being still alive. With the off-chance that scum plays with fire and leaves them alive.
To me it seems like you are trying to get a free kill on a town PR.
Please refer to the latest vote count post for deadline.igorsprite wrote: 6x186x
i didn't even notice that we only have 1 day left
i agree with clevelands, shin's roleclaim doesn't mean that he is town and him suggesting nolim contributes to my suspicions. idk why abraker insists that shin is town.
Vote: Shinrun
Basically thissamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
I also think voting ShinRun is the worst possible idea. If they are scum, we will know by next night. If they are town, we are saving scum the hassle of killing one of our PR.
Did you not read any of my post here: community/forums/posts/8435874igorsprite wrote: 6x186x
idk why abraker insists that shin is town.
When has your calmer "reformed" demeanor ever hint that you are a townie?igorsprite wrote: 6x186x
hey, i'm reformed nowsamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
I am most suspicious of igorsprite right now because they are acting very cooperative, which from previous game I have learned that they are mostly cooperative when being scum.![]()
ClevelandsMyBro wrote: 58np
igorsprite wrote: 6x186x
so we should vote for who is less active
ShinRun wrote: 4p6j2
Abraker will probably call this a terrible idea
Whom do you think is innocent/would you not vote against?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
I think I'm just gonna drop the last votesamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
@NotRaffi
@ClevelandsMyBro
Who would you vote today?
I don't think he'll respond.Julian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
Also Manish, try answering the question above.
You susJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
I don't agree with the idea of lynching Shin as it could affect this game deeply.
While his role is not confirmed, it would lead to a great disadvantage for town if he does in fact turn out to be what he claims.
Whom do you think is innocent/would you not vote against?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
I think I'm just gonna drop the last votesamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
@NotRaffi
@ClevelandsMyBro
Who would you vote today?
Is there any one whom you believe is a townie, or has lesser chance of being mafia?
Also Manish, try answering the question above.
It is 2 scum, 5 vanilla town and 2 random town roles. There is a more detailed explanation of this setup.manishmathur wrote: 49y5n
You susJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
I don't agree with the idea of lynching Shin as it could affect this game deeply.
While his role is not confirmed, it would lead to a great disadvantage for town if he does in fact turn out to be what he claims.
Whom do you think is innocent/would you not vote against?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
I think I'm just gonna drop the last votesamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
@NotRaffi
@ClevelandsMyBro
Who would you vote today?
Is there any one whom you believe is a townie, or has lesser chance of being mafia?
Also Manish, try answering the question above.
How the heck i suppose to know who is innocent. I don't even know the roles
Dont vote me
Whoops, my bad. Some games I've played before have that as a mechanic, so I got confused. Thanks for the correction.DCT wrote: 4w3f2c
A doctor can't heal themself.ghoulybits wrote: v2x52
If ShinRun is telling the truth and doesn't get voted out: we have a doctor who can heal himself / any town member that puts themselves at risk during the day
[b]VOTE: John Smith[/b]
i understand abraker's vote. my lack of activity, contribution, and knowledge of the game makes me a prime victim of lynching (at least today). i dont have an excuse other than i suck really. and i also dont wanna bring up external reasons.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
I'm more comfortable lynching Cleveland right now.
Vote: ClevelandsMyBro
after reading 125postsJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
I don't agree with the idea of lynching Shin as it could affect this game deeply.
While his role is not confirmed, it would lead to a great disadvantage for town if he does in fact turn out to be what he claims.
Whom do you think is innocent/would you not vote against?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
I think I'm just gonna drop the last votesamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
@NotRaffi
@ClevelandsMyBro
Who would you vote today?
Is there any one whom you believe is a townie, or has lesser chance of being mafia?
Also Manish, try answering the question above.
Glad to see you're on the same page.manishmathur wrote: 49y5n
Extendafter reading 125postsJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
I don't agree with the idea of lynching Shin as it could affect this game deeply.
While his role is not confirmed, it would lead to a great disadvantage for town if he does in fact turn out to be what he claims.
Whom do you think is innocent/would you not vote against?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
I think I'm just gonna drop the last votesamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
@NotRaffi
@ClevelandsMyBro
Who would you vote today?
Is there any one whom you believe is a townie, or has lesser chance of being mafia?
Also Manish, try answering the question above.
idk who is innocent but abraker and shitruin is pretty sus
shitruin being dumb at starting is very sus and I feel like he did that on purpose but if he didn't then he will die at night, so we should not vote him out and wait for him to die. If he didn't died then he is more sus because if there is 2 mafia and one is shitruin then the other mafia will not kill him so he will not be suspicious
abraker on the other hand feel super aggressive and I think he is just trying to make us confuse to who to vote.
VOTE abraker
Since you edited here,manishmathur wrote: 49y5n
You susJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
I don't agree with the idea of lynching Shin as it could affect this game deeply.
While his role is not confirmed, it would lead to a great disadvantage for town if he does in fact turn out to be what he claims.
Whom do you think is innocent/would you not vote against?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
I think I'm just gonna drop the last votesamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
@NotRaffi
@ClevelandsMyBro
Who would you vote today?
Is there any one whom you believe is a townie, or has lesser chance of being mafia?
Also Manish, try answering the question above.
How the heck i suppose to know who is innocent. I don't even know my role
Dont vote me
Editing your post is grounds for an immediate modkill. Don't do it. PLEASEThis is in case you did not read the rules and not aware of it.
DON'T DO IT.
i read the deadline wrong and got put on the spot by samx. then i made an absolute trash post about how you are scum based on only one reason + vote you. then i realised the dealine changed.ShinRun wrote: 4p6j2
Cleve - Cleveland is also pushing really hard to vote me off and his excuse of not reading correctly seems really suspicious. The only reason he unvoted me is that others were gonna vote him off.
i said UnvoteDCT wrote: 4w3f2c
ShinRun: (1) ClevelandsMyBro
No shit I super aggressive when town is a vote a away from lynching a pr townie. You should be too. I have no idea why people doubt Shin can be town. I have no idea why Shin's claim is fake. It just doesn't make sense for it to be fake.manishmathur wrote: 49y5n
abraker on the other hand feel super aggressive and I think he is just trying to make us confuse to who to vote.
VOTE abraker