What are the requirements?
Thanks, really appreciatedAchromalia wrote: 5ev6p
i'd genuinely celebrate that for you, and if you're finding some growth in enjoying time outside this wasteland, then i sure as hell would love to see you continue on with that. i can't imagine many people here will stop you from enjoying your life, it's a good thing to get to have and your time is a limited and permanent resource of continuity :>Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
Nice, I just wanted to check out OT and found that this drama is still going on lmao.
The latest 'age' has definitely lost meaning for 'me' since the requirement is low for 'my standard' and there are few in the 'age' that never became such a big part in OT to be rewarded with a title and not to mention there is one who still is not accepted as a part of this community.
Though, plus a point to patatitta, at least now I can distinguish which 'age' I dont see as quality.
Also if anyone wonders why I am not active. The biggest part is that I have lot interest and the 2nd biggest part is that I am trying to fix my life, trying to spend more time on useful stuff, focusing on exercise, quality sleep, quality study times and not fuck my mind over this forum. Cya I will see the next time I visit
as for the forum now, i really enjoy ot as it is. it's not as fun as it was during my age of roleplay, but i don't really need thrills to be content with the community here
though i won't exactly mind if someone comes out with a neat idea that everyone can play a part in~ but it really depends on who cares and whether an event even needs someone to care in order to be effective ot lore
anyway, go fix your life! savor something meaningful to you, find out what you can do for yourself and others ^^
looking at it, it seemed like there was NO post count requirement, only a time oneManishh wrote: 2k5q58
Currently it's 10 pages of post. Before patatitta, the post requirment was 20pages of post. Or am I wrong?Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t
It's at the top of the post.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
What are the requirements?
I really can't find anything, even in the ghoulybits change announcements it was only mentioned that you needed to submit a list of achievements to a member of parliament (something that I didn't do and still got denizen btw, like, was this ever enforced at all?), there was no mention of a post count changeYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
I don't know why it wasn't written there, because there was a post requirement. The sleepy government was seriously very sloppy in some places.
Not really related but as I believe I've stated before a few times, the list thing was never a formal requirement, it just made it easier for us and allowed people to show off things they felt could be overlooked. It was merely a way for us to allow someone who wished to be denizen to show off why they thought they should be. While it isn't written down anywhere that I recall, there's a strong chance that Penguin is behind the 20 page thing. That seems like a rather Penguin requirement.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
I really can't find anything, even in the ghoulybits change announcements it was only mentioned that you needed to submit a list of achievements to a member of parliament (something that I didn't do and still got denizen btw, like, was this ever enforced at all?), there was no mention of a post count changeYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
I don't know why it wasn't written there, because there was a post requirement. The sleepy government was seriously very sloppy in some places.![]()
Nah, I was always against the page requirement cause people were just spamming dogshit single word posts just to hit the post/page requirement, becoming a denizen, then leaving, having never really been a part of the community in the first place.ghoulybits wrote: v2x52
Not really related but as I believe I've stated before a few times, the list thing was never a formal requirement, it just made it easier for us and allowed people to show off things they felt could be overlooked. It was merely a way for us to allow someone who wished to be denizen to show off why they thought they should be. While it isn't written down anywhere that I recall, there's a strong chance that Penguin is behind the 20 page thing. That seems like a rather Penguin requirement.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
I really can't find anything, even in the ghoulybits change announcements it was only mentioned that you needed to submit a list of achievements to a member of parliament (something that I didn't do and still got denizen btw, like, was this ever enforced at all?), there was no mention of a post count changeYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
I don't know why it wasn't written there, because there was a post requirement. The sleepy government was seriously very sloppy in some places.![]()
well those 2 "people" need to shut the fuck upKarmine wrote: 6c5h1b
There's still only 2 people complaining about it, everyone else is either happy with it or most likely doesn't care.B0ii wrote: 33m13
any drama around an imaginary title is stupid
holy shit y'all are fucking stupid
359 posts of autism just for what
OT is boring without drama, though now I'm finding this little denizen spat to be boring too.B0ii wrote: 33m13
any drama around an imaginary title is stupid
holy shit y'all are fucking stupid
359 posts of autism just for what
Yes.B0ii wrote: 33m13
well those 2 "people" need to shut the fuck upKarmine wrote: 6c5h1b
There's still only 2 people complaining about it, everyone else is either happy with it or most likely doesn't care.B0ii wrote: 33m13
any drama around an imaginary title is stupid
holy shit y'all are fucking stupid
359 posts of autism just for what
I don't really plan on doing anything else, just maintaining what I have alreadyYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
OT is boring without drama, though now I'm finding this little denizen spat to be boring too.B0ii wrote: 33m13
any drama around an imaginary title is stupid
holy shit y'all are fucking stupid
359 posts of autism just for what
I'll wait until Pata does something so I can have my fun complaining again.
🙋♂️Patatitta wrote: 5t25
I don't really plan on doing anything else, just maintaining what I have alreadyYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
OT is boring without drama, though now I'm finding this little denizen spat to be boring too.B0ii wrote: 33m13
any drama around an imaginary title is stupid
holy shit y'all are fucking stupid
359 posts of autism just for what
I'll wait until Pata does something so I can have my fun complaining again.
I said I thought they were a comment farmer since I mostly see them in comment sectionPolyspora wrote: 4i695
ok?... what is your point then?I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p
Yes I'm a post farmer, thank you babyPolyspora wrote: 4i695
well, you're a post farmer and is still there, what is your point?I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p
What the hell is -Kori doing here, I thought they were a comment farmer
interesting moment here, so i think poly was searching for an illustration of hypocrisy...? or at least, there's a world in which poly is finding a way to stare daggers at anyone who is a post farmerI AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p
I said I thought they were a comment farmer since I mostly see them in comment sectionPolyspora wrote: 4i695
ok?... what is your point then?I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p
Yes I'm a post farmer, thank you babyPolyspora wrote: 4i695
well, you're a post farmer and is still there, what is your point?I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p
What the hell is -Kori doing here, I thought they were a comment farmer
What do you want now?
i hope i might understand your opinion there... arguably though, there is more to personality than anime threads and making flippant jokes and having specific argumentative debates with people. like, over the semantics of what we mean because any given selection of any given size of us forum denizens will misunderstand each other at some given moment in time for different reasons, and so onPolyspora wrote: 4i695
the strat is to show minimum personality as possibleAchromalia wrote: 5ev6p
blushing <3 still barely know you but you have my official "ok off-topic person" artstamp
yeah it was hipocrisy what I was referring to or trying to get out of thatAchromalia wrote: 5ev6p
interesting moment here, so i think poly was searching for an illustration of hypocrisy...? or at least, there's a world in which poly is finding a way to stare daggers at anyone who is a post farmerI AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p
I said I thought they were a comment farmer since I mostly see them in comment sectionPolyspora wrote: 4i695
ok?... what is your point then?I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p
Yes I'm a post farmer, thank you babyPolyspora wrote: 4i695
well, you're a post farmer and is still there, what is your point?I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p
What the hell is -Kori doing here, I thought they were a comment farmer
What do you want now?
...but i also think there's a chance you maybe were already thinking that and there could be some weird ive-aggressive thing going on between you two?
but now i think im reading too far into this
but like, why are people like that,, why am i like this? fascinating
i hope i might understand your opinion there... arguably though, there is more to personality than anime threads and making flippant jokes and having specific argumentative debates with people. like, over the semantics of what we mean because any given selection of any given size of us forum denizens will misunderstand each other at some given moment in time for different reasons, and so onPolyspora wrote: 4i695
the strat is to show minimum personality as possibleAchromalia wrote: 5ev6p
blushing <3 still barely know you but you have my official "ok off-topic person" artstamp
idk how, but? it seems to me blushing has lots of personality imo, which if im asked to demonstrate, i will probably either fail to demonstrate or take a while to elaborate on the few times i've ever interacted... which is largely similar to the way i would likely fail to demonstrate/elaborate why i think you or winny or pata or whoever else would have plenty of personality;;
...taking a step back... in truth, i think i'm unfairly presuming a lot more likelihood of you or other people viewing my responses with scrutiny than was merited of me to assume, it just seems like these kinds of commentary tones are rather common, instinctively i'll over-articulate myself for all those scenarios...
in any case, congrats blushing for being ok and being here
though i might be biased because of the one (1) dm during the one (1) time that one (1) thing happened, and the zero times in which i've faced whatever it is that could possibly be considered a "repercussion" in recent memory from the gmt