B0ii wrote: 33m13

Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d

Blushing wrote: 5x575

the few really ruin the subforum for the many

if things doesn't go as i plan or i want
it's better this place gets ruined
😠😠😠

🎶 shut the fuck up 🎶

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

i suggested the name cock enjoyers

we can’t just put everyone into one category that wouldn’t really be helpful

Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d

B0ii wrote: 33m13

Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d

Blushing wrote: 5x575

the few really ruin the subforum for the many

if things doesn't go as i plan or i want
it's better this place gets ruined
😠😠😠

🎶 shut the fuck up 🎶

🎶 please fuck off 🎶

B0ii wrote: 33m13

Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d

B0ii wrote: 33m13

Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d

Blushing wrote: 5x575

the few really ruin the subforum for the many

if things doesn't go as i plan or i want
it's better this place gets ruined
😠😠😠

🎶 shut the fuck up 🎶

🎶 please fuck off 🎶

🎶 Please stop insulting each other 🎶

his everything wrote: x243s

Am I the only one who has absolutely no idea who GhoulyBits is?

A rather irrelevant

ghoulybits wrote: v2x52

his everything wrote: x243s

Am I the only one who has absolutely no idea who GhoulyBits is?

A rather irrelevant

Best president.

No.

Jonarwhal wrote: 2rn49

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

i suggested the name cock enjoyers

we can’t just put everyone into one category that wouldn’t really be helpful

THE HUMAN BEINGS 3k252q

Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)

BluePyTheDeer_ wrote: 4m3m27

Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)

2

BluePyTheDeer_ wrote: 4m3m27

Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)

At least one.

BluePyTheDeer_ wrote: 4m3m27

Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)

103 post.

Each page consist 50 post so you have 2 whole pages. As the current requirement of denizen you need 10pages of post to complete the post requirement

ghoulybits wrote: v2x52

his everything wrote: x243s

Am I the only one who has absolutely no idea who GhoulyBits is?

A rather irrelevant

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

BluePyTheDeer_ wrote: 4m3m27

Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)

103 post.

Each page consist 50 post so you have 2 whole pages. As the current requirement of denizen you need 10pages of post to complete the post requirement

I think I could distribute my script that shows the OT posts that each one has, but I don't know if anyone will use it.

Exemple:

Get on github now

gg

UwU

Congratulations nominomu!

conga rats!

gg

who

ok i have at least seen the others in OT but this guy i unironically have never seen post in here, just remove the denizen system already?

Zain Sugieres wrote: 2n3vj

ok i have at least seen the others in OT but this guy i unironically have never seen post in here, just remove the denizen system already?

cope

"Errm, remove the hecking denizen already!!" ACK.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

"Errm, remove the hecking denizen already!!" ACK.

crazy how i dont even what made u so mad but yet i still live rent free in ur head

Zain Sugieres wrote: 2n3vj

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

"Errm, remove the hecking denizen already!!" ACK.

crazy how i dont even what made u so mad but yet i still live rent free in ur head

False

May I request to be removed from the system

the denizen rapture is coming, be ready

what

Wimpy Cursed wrote: 3z85k

May I request to be removed from the system

sure

Wimpy Cursed wrote: 3z85k

May I request to be removed from the system

too cool for the denizen system

👍

- cirno - wrote: 3z3423

👍

half a year latar he comes back and post a tumbs up emoji mad respect

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

- cirno - wrote: 3z3423

👍

half a year latar he comes back and post a tumbs up emoji mad respect

my computer keyboard got limeade on it so I didn't have the pc for half a year -w-

Wimpy Cursed wrote: 3z85k

May I request to be removed from the system

oh, right, forgot that was a thing now

me too, please

cephaphysic wrote: 1o5144

Wimpy Cursed wrote: 3z85k

May I request to be removed from the system

oh, right, forgot that was a thing now

me too, please

done

- cirno - wrote: 3z3423

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

- cirno - wrote: 3z3423

👍

half a year latar he comes back and post a tumbs up emoji mad respect

my computer keyboard got limeade on it so I didn't have the pc for half a year -w-

oof
welcome back bud

cephaphysic wrote: 1o5144

Wimpy Cursed wrote: 3z85k

May I request to be removed from the system

oh, right, forgot that was a thing now

me too, please

mark of a new movement

this is what i meant by rapture

I guess the example I found was just completely different

Wimpy Cursed wrote: 3z85k

I guess the example I found was just completely different

the deefinition was correct, it's just a way of speaking, they don't actually mean a biblical rapture

B0ii wrote: 33m13

- cirno - wrote: 3z3423

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

- cirno - wrote: 3z3423

👍

half a year latar he comes back and post a tumbs up emoji mad respect

my computer keyboard got limeade on it so I didn't have the pc for half a year -w-

oof
welcome back bud

hi

oh my god, oh my god guys, Im actually a denizen
edit: yeah I didn't see the original post

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

NOTICE 2v66t

For our next esteemed member, we might just need to summon some Giant Piloted Robots to hand them their well-deserved title. This individual is a connoisseur of all gaming classics, from exhilarating shoot 'em ups to intense fighting games. While they're not busy shaking up the status quo and reshaping the meta of OT, you can bet on finding them contributing their insights in just about every corner of the "Other" subforum. Let's give a resounding round of applause to: MaxIsABigKaiju!

oh swag congrats to everyone

lumping people from 2008 and 2017 together and calling this fabricated era "glorified forum games" (???) is the most patatitta thing i've ever seen. i suppose this works well for a fanfiction project

Nice Job

Serraionga wrote: 2r3s1z

lumping people from 2008 and 2017 together and calling this fabricated era "glorified forum games" (???) is the most patatitta thing i've ever seen. i suppose this works well for a fanfiction project

Nice Job

what description would you give?, up to 2013 or so it isn't too shitposty like it is now, and I decided to write that since like, more than half that age was like that

How much posts do I have?

BluePyTheDeer_ wrote: 4m3m27

How much posts do I have?

you can check it yourself, ~320

BluePyTheDeer_ wrote: 4m3m27

How much posts do I have?

336

how am i not in here

I miss the old thread.

what.

npc_BeaniCraft wrote: 1e3gj

what.

idk man

So why did we get rid of the clear distinctions between generations? I hate to say it but I prefer abrakers system faaaaar more than this.

Offdensen wrote: 6v3o3g

how am i not in here

You literally are

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

I miss the old thread.

cry more

Ashton wrote: 561r4z

So why did we get rid of the clear distinctions between generations? I hate to say it but I prefer abrakers system faaaaar more than this.

The gen "distinctions" were basically a combination of gaslighting and very subjective reasoning, abraker changed gens whenever it just felt right, for gen 10 and 11 in fact there were a lot of drama with the generation change because it just made no sense, if you were to actually sit down and see the culture of each gen, you would realize it's basically the same all the way around.

It was changed to have a system that is more clear, easier to understand, that creates less drama, and so far, this thread has achieved it's goal.

aren't you like the most hated president in ot history

Taco wrote: 3q6t1c

create less drama

Taco wrote: 3q6t1c

achieved its goal

Uh.

Ashton wrote: 561r4z

aren't you like the most hated president in ot history

by oldfag

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Taco wrote: 3q6t1c

create less drama

Taco wrote: 3q6t1c

achieved its goal

Uh.

I mean, the current "drama" is that i'm not abraker, any change to the system would have created that reaction, however, the actual system hasn't really backfired once yet, no drama about gens changing when they should be, of people not beig added 6 momnths after they meet the requirement, no drama about if someone should be removed from denizen, etc, it's been working as it should be

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Ashton wrote: 561r4z

aren't you like the most hated president in ot history

by oldfag

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Taco wrote: 3q6t1c

create less drama

Taco wrote: 3q6t1c

achieved its goal

Uh.

I mean, the current "drama" is that i'm not abraker, any change to the system would have created that reaction, however, the actual system hasn't really backfired once yet, no drama about gens changing when they should be, of people not beig added 6 momnths after they meet the requirement, no drama about if someone should be removed from denizen, etc, it's been working as it should be

i apologize for incidentally adding onto the pressure, i dont have a particularly strong opinion either way, but i'd like to understand:

how is it that the "current drama" is necessarily about you not being abraker?

(and does it not seem plausible that there were things abraker did that people happen to prefer? i can't really point to those distinctions myself, so i don't really have an argument to make in posing this follow-up question, but i also think it might be fair to consider this if it's not something that can be explained)

I wonder if the lack of drama stems from the fact that denizen has lost all meaning after all your changes; though I do recall that making denizen meaningless (or deleting entirely) was one of your goals.

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Ashton wrote: 561r4z

aren't you like the most hated president in ot history

by oldfag

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Taco wrote: 3q6t1c

create less drama

Taco wrote: 3q6t1c

achieved its goal

Uh.

I mean, the current "drama" is that i'm not abraker, any change to the system would have created that reaction, however, the actual system hasn't really backfired once yet, no drama about gens changing when they should be, of people not beig added 6 momnths after they meet the requirement, no drama about if someone should be removed from denizen, etc, it's been working as it should be

i apologize for incidentally adding onto the pressure, i dont have a particularly strong opinion either way, but i'd like to understand:

how is it that the "current drama" is necessarily about you not being abraker?

(and does it not seem plausible that there were things abraker did that people happen to prefer? i can't really point to those distinctions myself, so i don't really have an argument to make in posing this follow-up question, but i also think it might be fair to consider this if it's not something that can be explained)

nah it's not pressure, you haven't been here when I first got president, people wanted me GONE badly

Me not being abraker is not the reason, however it kinda illustrates the point I want to make, if you were to look at the original denizen thread in a more objective way, you would see the system we used to have failed at it, if the point was to preserve OT history, it was too confusing to understand and each gen lacked the context for a new to come in OT and understand it, the gen changes were mainly defined by OT lore, which you will have noticed it's currently very absent from current OT, so abraker just started changing the gens when it just felt right, which led to many problems, since at that point in time abraker wasn't really active in OT and was pretty out of touch with many things, however, abraker ruling kept being king because well, he was abraker, the person with the most authority in OT.

the system just didn't work, and the people running the thread just started freeballing it, the requirements were not enforced, people who met the 8 month activity requirement and had created many posts and threads didn't get denizen while someone like blushing, who didn't meet the requirements, got it, and instead of just reversing the changes, a vote was held to decide if the very obvious rule breakin should be reversed, no vote for blushing to get in but one for him to get out, the system was biased as fuck.

But well, most people in OT never really challenged the system, for most people the denizen thread existed even from before they ed OT or osu and would probably still exist for the day they quit, everyone just was used to it. + you, as a newfag, even if you saw flaws with the system, you didn't have the authority to criticize it.

Then I come in and actually change the system, changing the thing everyone is used to basing myself on the problems people had learn to ignore, not only that, but I wasn't abraker, if abraker wanted to change something in OT, they could just do it, no question asked, I don't have that level of power. It's natural for people to be really mad at me, however, I truly think that i'm in the right with the changes I have made, so I don't really care

also, the people actually criticizing me are like the same 3 people every time, the wider OT community doesn't really seem to care, is that because denizen has lost all prestige?, maybe, I do personally think some people do care enough to check this thread and don't really see anything wrong with it, people still react at the announcements and shit

Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.

imagine being ionate about it

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.

imagine being ionate about it

imagine the chances of everyone being conventionally human and probably having/lacking investments that don't necessarily depend on another person's understanding or approval

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.

imagine being ionate about it

imagine the chances of everyone being conventionally human and probably having/lacking investments that don't necessarily depend on another person's understanding or approval

can you dumb this down

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.

imagine being ionate about it

imagine the chances of everyone being conventionally human and probably having/lacking investments that don't necessarily depend on another person's understanding or approval

can you dumb this down

you and i and those nerds are all persons, and it is normal that people tend to care (or not care) about different things, which can easily happen whether or not someone else agrees or thinks it makes sense

(the unstated message: "posting about how weird it might be that someone cares or doesn't care about a certain thing is not very useful, probably. if you want to know, ask why. if you don't, idk i guess you're free to be boring if you don't want to leave it alone")

((that being said, i don't actually expect that or want to impose any of that, i'm just satisfying my own need to be correct~))

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

you and i and those nerds are all persons, and it is normal that people tend to care (or not care) about different things, which can easily happen whether or not someone else agrees or thinks it makes sense

My comment was semi-sarcastic. One is free to care about whatever they please, just that I hope they can be rational individuals too and not start flame wars. I look at my time advocating Linux here as pretty cringe for this exact reason.

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.

imagine being ionate about it

imagine the chances of everyone being conventionally human and probably having/lacking investments that don't necessarily depend on another person's understanding or approval

can you dumb this down

you and i and those nerds are all persons, and it is normal that people tend to care (or not care) about different things, which can easily happen whether or not someone else agrees or thinks it makes sense

(the unstated message: "posting about how weird it might be that someone cares or doesn't care about a certain thing is not very useful, probably. if you want to know, ask why. if you don't, idk i guess you're free to be boring if you don't want to leave it alone")

((that being said, i don't actually expect that or want to impose any of that, i'm just satisfying my own need to be correct~))

(personal information revealed that wasnt supposed to be here please ignore)
*to gmts, silence.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

you and i and those nerds are all persons, and it is normal that people tend to care (or not care) about different things, which can easily happen whether or not someone else agrees or thinks it makes sense

My comment was semi-sarcastic. One is free to care about whatever they please, just that I hope they can be rational individuals too and not start flame wars. I look at my time advocating Linux here as pretty cringe for this exact reason.

tf character development!?!?

Nice, I just wanted to check out OT and found that this drama is still going on lmao.

The latest 'age' has definitely lost meaning for 'me' since the requirement is low for 'my standard' and there are few in the 'age' that never became such a big part in OT to be rewarded with a title and not to mention there is one who still is not accepted as a part of this community.

Though, plus a point to patatitta, at least now I can distinguish which 'age' I dont see as quality.


Also if anyone wonders why I am not active. The biggest part is that I have lot interest and the 2nd biggest part is that I am trying to fix my life, trying to spend more time on useful stuff, focusing on exercise, quality sleep, quality study times and not fuck my mind over this forum. Cya I will see the next time I visit

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

Nice, I just wanted to check out OT and found that this drama is still going on lmao.

The latest 'age' has definitely lost meaning for 'me' since the requirement is low for 'my standard' and there are few in the 'age' that never became such a big part in OT to be rewarded with a title and not to mention there is one who still is not accepted as a part of this community.

Though, plus a point to patatitta, at least now I can distinguish which 'age' I dont see as quality.

Also if anyone wonders why I am not active. The biggest part is that I have lot interest and the 2nd biggest part is that I am trying to fix my life, trying to spend more time on useful stuff, focusing on exercise, quality sleep, quality study times and not fuck my mind over this forum. Cya I will see the next time I visit

i'd genuinely celebrate that for you, and if you're finding some growth in enjoying time outside this wasteland, then i sure as hell would love to see you continue on with that. i can't imagine many people here will stop you from enjoying your life, it's a good thing to get to have and your time is a limited and permanent resource of continuity :>

as for the forum now, i really enjoy ot as it is. it's not as fun as it was during my age of roleplay, but i don't really need thrills to be content with the community here

though i won't exactly mind if someone comes out with a neat idea that everyone can play a part in~ but it really depends on who cares and whether an event even needs someone to care in order to be effective ot lore

anyway, go fix your life! savor something meaningful to you, find out what you can do for yourself and others ^^

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

The latest 'age' has definitely lost meaning for 'me' since the requirement is low for 'my standard' and there are few in the 'age' that never became such a big part in OT to be rewarded with a title and not to mention there is one who still is not accepted as a part of this community.

Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?

Is this a joke to do an epic dunk on the haters or is this a genuine question?

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?

Is this a joke to do an epic dunk on the haters or is this a genuine question?

no, karmine is right, the new requirements are the highest they've ever been, it's just that previous to that requirement were only a suggestion, so in practice, it kinda works different, IMO better

proud to be writing history

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?

Is this a joke to do an epic dunk on the haters or is this a genuine question?

no, karmine is right, the new requirements are the highest they've ever been, it's just that previous to that requirement were only a suggestion, so in practice, it kinda works different, IMO better

What's higher about the new requirement? The hardest part of the old stuff was the achievement aspect.
If the requirements were as high as you've claimed the denizens Emjakolic, MaxIsABigKaiju, Kori and BeaniCraft would not be denizens in the first place, unless you know something about them that I don't.

Otherwise I assume the requirement increase you must be referring to post count and time spent on the forum, which isn't really difficult.

Granted I don't know where to find these new requirements so I don't really know what's going on. No, I have not actively looked for it, so I'm aware that's a fault on my part.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?

Is this a joke to do an epic dunk on the haters or is this a genuine question?

no, karmine is right, the new requirements are the highest they've ever been, it's just that previous to that requirement were only a suggestion, so in practice, it kinda works different, IMO better

What's higher about the new requirement? The hardest part of the old stuff was the achievement aspect.
If the requirements were as high as you've claimed the denizens Emjakolic, MaxIsABigKaiju, Kori and BeaniCraft would not be denizens in the first place, unless you know something about them that I don't.

Otherwise I assume the requirement increase you must be referring to post count and time spent on the forum, which isn't really difficult.

Granted I don't know where to find these new requirements so I don't really know what's going on. No, I have not actively looked for it, so I'm aware that's a fault on my part.

the achievement thing wasn't actually explicit in the requirements, it's just something that it was added on extraordinarily, I mean the time and post requirement are the highest

Considering that this is the first time (at least in the time I've spent here) that meeting a certain post number and time is the only factor necessary, I'd argue that it's much easier to get denizenship now despite the whole requirement thing being some add-on.

On a side note, I was under the impression that denizenship required 20 pages previously (1000 posts I believe). I'll probably need to fact check that sometime later.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Considering that this is the first time (at least in the time I've spent here) that meeting a certain post number and time is the only factor necessary, I'd argue that it's much easier to get denizenship now despite the whole requirement thing being some add-on.

On a side note, I was under the impression that denizenship required 20 pages previously (1000 posts I believe). I'll probably need to fact check that sometime later.

The thing about needing to actually "achieve" something on OT was added quite late (in the history of denizenship) never really enforced, if it was there would have been almost no denizen since.
When there were events it would have been people who organised them but now OT is less big things and more small things so most people don't do anything significant aside from just being here, which imo is enough to be considered a part of the community.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?

Is this a joke to do an epic dunk on the haters or is this a genuine question?

I think bait is turning society retarted

if u went by achievements itd only be jesus1412, lewa and me in here because were the only OTers to every achieve anything worth of note in osu as a whole

What are the requirements?

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

What are the requirements?

It's at the top of the post.

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

Nice, I just wanted to check out OT and found that this drama is still going on lmao.

The latest 'age' has definitely lost meaning for 'me' since the requirement is low for 'my standard' and there are few in the 'age' that never became such a big part in OT to be rewarded with a title and not to mention there is one who still is not accepted as a part of this community.

Though, plus a point to patatitta, at least now I can distinguish which 'age' I dont see as quality.

Also if anyone wonders why I am not active. The biggest part is that I have lot interest and the 2nd biggest part is that I am trying to fix my life, trying to spend more time on useful stuff, focusing on exercise, quality sleep, quality study times and not fuck my mind over this forum. Cya I will see the next time I visit

i'd genuinely celebrate that for you, and if you're finding some growth in enjoying time outside this wasteland, then i sure as hell would love to see you continue on with that. i can't imagine many people here will stop you from enjoying your life, it's a good thing to get to have and your time is a limited and permanent resource of continuity :>

as for the forum now, i really enjoy ot as it is. it's not as fun as it was during my age of roleplay, but i don't really need thrills to be content with the community here

though i won't exactly mind if someone comes out with a neat idea that everyone can play a part in~ but it really depends on who cares and whether an event even needs someone to care in order to be effective ot lore

anyway, go fix your life! savor something meaningful to you, find out what you can do for yourself and others ^^

Thanks, really appreciated

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

What are the requirements?

It's at the top of the post.

Currently it's 10 pages of post. Before patatitta, the post requirment was 20pages of post. Or am I wrong?

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

What are the requirements?

It's at the top of the post.

Currently it's 10 pages of post. Before patatitta, the post requirment was 20pages of post. Or am I wrong?

looking at it, it seemed like there was NO post count requirement, only a time one

I don't know why it wasn't written there, because there was a post requirement. The sleepy government was seriously very sloppy in some places.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I don't know why it wasn't written there, because there was a post requirement. The sleepy government was seriously very sloppy in some places.

I really can't find anything, even in the ghoulybits change announcements it was only mentioned that you needed to submit a list of achievements to a member of parliament (something that I didn't do and still got denizen btw, like, was this ever enforced at all?), there was no mention of a post count change

All I know is that I definitely wasn't the person to create this 20 page rule. Quite frankly I can't even when it was communicated to me, but it definitely was a requirement; and it was one that makes sense too.

As for the list of achievements, one of my goals was to bring that back sometime through denizenship registrations but eventually we scrapped that idea altogether after realising that all the initiative did (for the most part) was give denizen to people who should have had it already. Though I still think that listing achievements should be brought back properly, the only issue being denying someone denizenship after offering it is both a little disrespectful and a little complicated.

There was a post requirement of 20pages. I am sure about it. Even if it's not written, it has applied

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

There was a post requirement of 20pages. I am sure about it. Even if it's not written, it has applied

I swear it was never more than 10 pages but then I find this and wonder if I pulled those numbers out of my ass

hey abraker are you still dead

-Kori wrote: 3l5a4j

hey abraker are you still dead

depends on how alive people need me to be

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

There was a post requirement of 20pages. I am sure about it. Even if it's not written, it has applied

I swear it was never more than 10 pages but then I find this and wonder if I pulled those numbers out of my ass

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

There was a post requirement of 20pages. I am sure about it. Even if it's not written, it has applied

I swear it was never more than 10 pages but then I find this and wonder if I pulled those numbers out of my ass

Hmmmm

-Kori wrote: 3l5a4j

hey abraker are you still dead

depends on how alive people need me to be

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I don't know why it wasn't written there, because there was a post requirement. The sleepy government was seriously very sloppy in some places.

I really can't find anything, even in the ghoulybits change announcements it was only mentioned that you needed to submit a list of achievements to a member of parliament (something that I didn't do and still got denizen btw, like, was this ever enforced at all?), there was no mention of a post count change

Not really related but as I believe I've stated before a few times, the list thing was never a formal requirement, it just made it easier for us and allowed people to show off things they felt could be overlooked. It was merely a way for us to allow someone who wished to be denizen to show off why they thought they should be. While it isn't written down anywhere that I recall, there's a strong chance that Penguin is behind the 20 page thing. That seems like a rather Penguin requirement.

penguin strikes again u.u otherwise a reasonable bit of forethought through the list, but i guess it's still ultimately an unfortunate case of ambiguity/arbitrarity in practice from how people seem to have grievances with it

nothing else to add, i just wish it were better with clarity for people when it'd been implemented

...not that it necessarily must've been just a matter of clarity, but... it's interesting to return and find these experiences with systems of denizenship being left here in this state

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

guys I think I ate a parasite that was on my salmon

for the love of god did you eat the pacific salmon

MaxIsABigKaiju wrote: 5b4w4z

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

guys I think I ate a parasite that was on my salmon

for the love of god did you eat the pacific salmon

uuuuh, it was orange on the inside, I dont know anything else really