shhhh...Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b
I will be the next president.
dont jinx it this early man
something like the denizen system is bound to happen, either sooner or later and deleting wont really resolve the process as one could just simply recreate it againBlushing wrote: 5x575
ideally the denizen system should have never been made, I dont think abraker had the idea it would be morphed and amalgamized into what it is today.
You call the denizen a "Hall of shame". The title which many sees as people who contributed to OT! and now you are saying why are they mad.Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b
That's literally what you're doing.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
yeah but some want to make it better while calling it a shit.roufou wrote: 5k65h
I think the denizen system is ok for historical purposes to people who have been active on OT. I don't really care about making it a bigger deal than that.
if you think the title is wrong then make a report about it. otherwise you are really the only person complaining about it.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
You call the denizen a "Hall of shame". The title which many sees as people who contributed to OT! and now you are saying why are they mad.Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b
That's literally what you're doing.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
yeah but some want to make it better while calling it a shit.roufou wrote: 5k65h
I think the denizen system is ok for historical purposes to people who have been active on OT. I don't really care about making it a bigger deal than that.
I dont understand why are there people in the government who sees OT! as a shitland, call the title which many has work on shit and still disrespecting whoever dont want the denizen to be called shit. How thats hard to understand
finally somebody said what I was thinkingBlushing wrote: 5x575
if you think the title is wrong then make a report about it. otherwise you are really the only person complaining about it.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
You call the denizen a "Hall of shame". The title which many sees as people who contributed to OT! and now you are saying why are they mad.Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b
That's literally what you're doing.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
yeah but some want to make it better while calling it a shit.roufou wrote: 5k65h
I think the denizen system is ok for historical purposes to people who have been active on OT. I don't really care about making it a bigger deal than that.
I dont understand why are there people in the government who sees OT! as a shitland, call the title which many has work on shit and still disrespecting whoever dont want the denizen to be called shit. How thats hard to understand
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
just because its off topic doesnt mean you guys can be profane. there are less indecent ways to say the way your feel.
I just dont think its worth trying to go against this stuff. Everytime I try and voice my opinion about anything in this game I am thrown 10 feet under or I am shafted.
I wasn't expected to be even brought onto parliament, and I guess I was elected at the slow point of it all.
If there are genuine issues you want to try and talk through, im always open in DM
i want to be a memorable figure in this site and it feels like i am not rewarded despite of all the efforts that i've madeBlushing wrote: 5x575
anything you want to bring up or talk about. any and all issues. the idea of parliament is supposed to be a way for you or other people to bring up issues and we can discuss a solution.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
what are genuine issues
the solution we could discuss is a feeling of self-fulfillment rather than an arbitrary "title" that "matters" in only 1 subforum.Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d
i want to be a memorable figure in this site and it feels like i am not rewarded despite of all the efforts that i've madeBlushing wrote: 5x575
anything you want to bring up or talk about. any and all issues. the idea of parliament is supposed to be a way for you or other people to bring up issues and we can discuss a solution.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
what are genuine issues
can we discuss a solution?
but that title is the only thing that can fulfill me, i only have ot, without ot i am nothing, ot is my everythingBlushing wrote: 5x575
the solution we could discuss is a feeling of self-fulfillment rather than an arbitrary "title" that "matters" in only 1 subforum.Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d
i want to be a memorable figure in this site and it feels like i am not rewarded despite of all the efforts that i've madeBlushing wrote: 5x575
anything you want to bring up or talk about. any and all issues. the idea of parliament is supposed to be a way for you or other people to bring up issues and we can discuss a solution.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
what are genuine issues
can we discuss a solution?
there is another thing that can fill youScyla wrote: 1d6q5d
but that title is the only thing that can fulfill me, i only have ot, without ot i am nothing, ot is my everythingBlushing wrote: 5x575
the solution we could discuss is a feeling of self-fulfillment rather than an arbitrary "title" that "matters" in only 1 subforum.Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d
i want to be a memorable figure in this site and it feels like i am not rewarded despite of all the efforts that i've madeBlushing wrote: 5x575
anything you want to bring up or talk about. any and all issues. the idea of parliament is supposed to be a way for you or other people to bring up issues and we can discuss a solution.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
what are genuine issues
can we discuss a solution?
🎶 Please stop insulting each other 🎶B0ii wrote: 33m13
🎶 please fuck off 🎶Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d
B0ii wrote: 33m13
🎶 shut the fuck up 🎶Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d
if things doesn't go as i plan or i wantBlushing wrote: 5x575
the few really ruin the subforum for the many
it's better this place gets ruined
😠😠😠![]()
I think I could distribute my script that shows the OT posts that each one has, but I don't know if anyone will use it.Manishh wrote: 2k5q58
103 post.BluePyTheDeer_ wrote: 4m3m27
Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)
Each page consist 50 post so you have 2 whole pages. As the current requirement of denizen you need 10pages of post to complete the post requirement
Patatitta wrote: 5t25
NOTICE 2v66t
For our next esteemed member, we might just need to summon some Giant Piloted Robots to hand them their well-deserved title. This individual is a connoisseur of all gaming classics, from exhilarating shoot 'em ups to intense fighting games. While they're not busy shaking up the status quo and reshaping the meta of OT, you can bet on finding them contributing their insights in just about every corner of the "Other" subforum. Let's give a resounding round of applause to: MaxIsABigKaiju!
what description would you give?, up to 2013 or so it isn't too shitposty like it is now, and I decided to write that since like, more than half that age was like thatSerraionga wrote: 2r3s1z
lumping people from 2008 and 2017 together and calling this fabricated era "glorified forum games" (???) is the most patatitta thing i've ever seen. i suppose this works well for a fanfiction project
Nice Job![]()
You literally areOffdensen wrote: 6v3o3g
how am i not in here
cry moreKobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
I miss the old thread.
The gen "distinctions" were basically a combination of gaslighting and very subjective reasoning, abraker changed gens whenever it just felt right, for gen 10 and 11 in fact there were a lot of drama with the generation change because it just made no sense, if you were to actually sit down and see the culture of each gen, you would realize it's basically the same all the way around.Ashton wrote: 561r4z
So why did we get rid of the clear distinctions between generations? I hate to say it but I prefer abrakers system faaaaar more than this.
by oldfagAshton wrote: 561r4z
aren't you like the most hated president in ot history
I mean, the current "drama" is that i'm not abraker, any change to the system would have created that reaction, however, the actual system hasn't really backfired once yet, no drama about gens changing when they should be, of people not beig added 6 momnths after they meet the requirement, no drama about if someone should be removed from denizen, etc, it's been working as it should beYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
Taco wrote: 3q6t1c
create less dramaUh.Taco wrote: 3q6t1c
achieved its goal
i apologize for incidentally adding onto the pressure, i dont have a particularly strong opinion either way, but i'd like to understand:Patatitta wrote: 5t25
by oldfagAshton wrote: 561r4z
aren't you like the most hated president in ot history
I mean, the current "drama" is that i'm not abraker, any change to the system would have created that reaction, however, the actual system hasn't really backfired once yet, no drama about gens changing when they should be, of people not beig added 6 momnths after they meet the requirement, no drama about if someone should be removed from denizen, etc, it's been working as it should beYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
Taco wrote: 3q6t1c
create less dramaUh.Taco wrote: 3q6t1c
achieved its goal
nah it's not pressure, you haven't been here when I first got president, people wanted me GONE badlyAchromalia wrote: 5ev6p
i apologize for incidentally adding onto the pressure, i dont have a particularly strong opinion either way, but i'd like to understand:Patatitta wrote: 5t25
by oldfagAshton wrote: 561r4z
aren't you like the most hated president in ot history
I mean, the current "drama" is that i'm not abraker, any change to the system would have created that reaction, however, the actual system hasn't really backfired once yet, no drama about gens changing when they should be, of people not beig added 6 momnths after they meet the requirement, no drama about if someone should be removed from denizen, etc, it's been working as it should beYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
Taco wrote: 3q6t1c
create less dramaUh.Taco wrote: 3q6t1c
achieved its goal
how is it that the "current drama" is necessarily about you not being abraker?
(and does it not seem plausible that there were things abraker did that people happen to prefer? i can't really point to those distinctions myself, so i don't really have an argument to make in posing this follow-up question, but i also think it might be fair to consider this if it's not something that can be explained)