You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
I'm fine with anything so long as everyone is happy.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
You never know if they are happy, there is only few in OT! Who gonna show discomfort regarding a topic. One of them is patatittaYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
I'm fine with anything so long as everyone is happy.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
I mean, my argument isManishh wrote: 2k5q58
You never know if they are happy, there is only few in OT! Who gonna show discomfort regarding a topic. One of them is patatittaYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
I'm fine with anything so long as everyone is happy.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
criticizing it in this way won't make things any better ngl.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
yes, I'm actively criticizing itsametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote: 5t25
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
Aint no way you said this to this guy. Aint no way. Do you have any idea how long this dude have tried to make a change?Anaxii wrote: 3s5x72
criticizing it in this way won't make things any better ngl.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
yes, I'm actively criticizing itsametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote: 5t25
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
idk I thought the joke was funnyAnaxii wrote: 3s5x72
criticizing it in this way won't make things any better ngl.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
yes, I'm actively criticizing itsametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote: 5t25
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
no, corne literally asked who is against blushingManishh wrote: 2k5q58
thats how we are talking about this topic, no?Arctos Sagittario wrote: 6dk2h
personally I’d prefer the blushing denizenship issue should be talked as “why or why not the complaints are valid”, not “who’s having problem”
making this thing personal will not be constructive
starting dancing jumpstyle when i read thisCorne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p
NOTICE 2v66t
As decided in the vote regarding denizenship, Blushing has been removed from the denizen list until they meet the requirements to be denizen.
You didn't hear the news? The guy sitting in the president chair has a personal vendetta against the denizens thing. Rumor is, he wants to burn this whole place to the ground. You and me are both in gen 10, I reckon. The gen that was always paired up with the 9th, ? Been a long time since I recited these numbers… It's over now. None of this matters. All the friends, all the lovers, all the enemies, all the rivals we've made are now not even dwellers, but simple bystanders.sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
wait what..??Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
Posting here one last time before everything burns to ashes.![]()
Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
You didn't hear the news? The guy sitting in the president chair has a personal vendetta against the denizens thing. Rumor is, he wants to burn this whole place to the ground. You and me are both in gen 10, I reckon. The gen that was always paired up with the 9th, ? Been a long time since I recited these numbers… It's over now. None of this matters. All the friends, all the lovers, all the enemies, all the rivals we've made are now not even dwellers, but simple bystanders.sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
wait what..??Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
Posting here one last time before everything burns to ashes.![]()
If this continues on, I will have no choice but to call for an open rebellion.![]()
that is called propagandaPatatitta wrote: 5t25
Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
You didn't hear the news? The guy sitting in the president chair has a personal vendetta against the denizens thing. Rumor is, he wants to burn this whole place to the ground. You and me are both in gen 10, I reckon. The gen that was always paired up with the 9th, ? Been a long time since I recited these numbers… It's over now. None of this matters. All the friends, all the lovers, all the enemies, all the rivals we've made are now not even dwellers, but simple bystanders.sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
wait what..??Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
Posting here one last time before everything burns to ashes.![]()
If this continues on, I will have no choice but to call for an open rebellion.![]()
![]()
I dont wanna believe this but thats the truth guys. We will be nothing more than bystanders and will see the history burn to ashes. There is nothing we can doKobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
You didn't hear the news? The guy sitting in the president chair has a personal vendetta against the denizens thing. Rumor is, he wants to burn this whole place to the ground. You and me are both in gen 10, I reckon. The gen that was always paired up with the 9th, ? Been a long time since I recited these numbers… It's over now. None of this matters. All the friends, all the lovers, all the enemies, all the rivals we've made are now not even dwellers, but simple bystanders.sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
wait what..??Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
Posting here one last time before everything burns to ashes.![]()
If this continues on, I will have no choice but to call for an open rebellion.![]()