The Blushing Incident: Corne Amnesia arcCorne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p
weird, I don't removing Blushing...Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
The Blushing Incident.Anaxii wrote: 3s5x72
btw is it normal that Blushing is no longer in the original post? he was there yesterday lol
forum
ATTENTION Newfags, Midfags, Oldfags, and Otherfags!!! 4s2y1u
posted
Total Posts
4,159
my contributions are not schizoposting and making large amounts of threads, but making posts and being recognized as a voice of reason, trusting, having a voice when it comes to policy, rule, and other changes that impact OT.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
I may not meet the 300 (subjective) posts in OT, but my contributions are still vast and can potentially be used for other stuff going forward. I also may not meet the activity requirements but that does not mean I am not active in the subforum. I implore you to look past your bias about having "such a title". It is a title in a subforum for a game. I did not strive to have this except to not have to make a "coup" to in the presidency elections.
I did such because anyone here is unlikely to make changes in a way that will actually matter or get done (example: the past president and parliament being lazy/inactive after they get the role).
I want to preface that the denizen acceptance was not done in an echo chamber of the #ThreadRights group but from a committee that had equal parts in the #ThreadRights group and equal parts not a part of.
If you are so inclined to see an issue about this I want you to see your local representative and... oh wait, they are inactive and wont do anything...
Regardless, because of the waves it can create I will refrain from trying for presidency, and will do the stuff I want to do despite the title/role.
If the denizen acceptance committee wish to revoke the title then do so, it matters not.
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
I'm fine with anything so long as everyone is happy.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
You never know if they are happy, there is only few in OT! Who gonna show discomfort regarding a topic. One of them is patatittaYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
I'm fine with anything so long as everyone is happy.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
I mean, my argument isManishh wrote: 2k5q58
You never know if they are happy, there is only few in OT! Who gonna show discomfort regarding a topic. One of them is patatittaYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
I'm fine with anything so long as everyone is happy.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote: 2z2l6t
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote: 33m13
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote: 5t25
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
denizen is a something that represents who is active in OT, and at what time. Some people may even say that denizens are only the people who had an impact in OT. Every gen is a different stage of the life of OT. If we start adding people who aren't active to a generation, not adding people that should be in, or changing the generation for no reason at all. It becomes a mess. Make enough mistakes and now the system that you had that you work becomes an incomprehensible mess, and that is what has already happened with denizen. We should aim to fix this problem, not make it worse
you guys have to understand that i'm not just some hater that hates fun and hates everyone and whatever, I just believe that we should try to not shoot ourselves in the foot
removing blushing will just keep things the same way they were like 3 days ago, which I think it's fine, just, wait a bit, and whenever the time es and blushing actually earns the title, give it to them.
NOTICE 2v66t
Called to OT! during times of necessity, this individual takes on a title higher than 'Denizen' itself. Preventing a potential extinction of the subforum, he arrives as if a king had returned to his people, making something like 'fitting in' appear so trivial. But unlike those kings of the past, he ensures to continuously pave the livelihood of OT, participating in the shenanigans of his people, disguising himself as a commoner. Despite his higher status, his upkeep of Off-Topic cannot be ignored as an achievement more than suitable for the role of Denizen.
We, the Denizenship Comittee, would like to name the great Kobold84 as Gen10's newest Denizen.
~Ymir
We, the Denizenship Comittee, would like to name the great Kobold84 as Gen10's newest Denizen.
NOTICE 2v66t
As the sun sets on another generation, the Gen10 people gather to count their numbers. "Someone is missing," a voice yells out. They were right, how could anyone forget.
This plays a key role in the make-up of Gen 10, almost as if they themselves encapsulate the very nature of the generation. Often when thinking of the 10th Generation, s turn to his image. Enthusiastic, hard working and fun. His love for locomotives makes him iconic, a brilliant example of the sheer power of a strong personality. Unforgettable, and truly remarkable.
The Denizenship committee had picked this generation up from a state of disarray, but as we place the final puzzle piece right in the centre, we do so with pride.
We, the Denizenship Comittee, would like to give our final gift to the 10th Generation. A final splash of colour into this collage of kindness, excitement, interests and creativity. This final piece is no other than Sametdze himself.
With this spectacular individual, we would like to close the 10th Generation. Congratulations, and thank you.
~Ymir
This plays a key role in the make-up of Gen 10, almost as if they themselves encapsulate the very nature of the generation. Often when thinking of the 10th Generation, s turn to his image. Enthusiastic, hard working and fun. His love for locomotives makes him iconic, a brilliant example of the sheer power of a strong personality. Unforgettable, and truly remarkable.
The Denizenship committee had picked this generation up from a state of disarray, but as we place the final puzzle piece right in the centre, we do so with pride.
We, the Denizenship Comittee, would like to give our final gift to the 10th Generation. A final splash of colour into this collage of kindness, excitement, interests and creativity. This final piece is no other than Sametdze himself.
With this spectacular individual, we would like to close the 10th Generation. Congratulations, and thank you.
criticizing it in this way won't make things any better ngl.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
yes, I'm actively criticizing itsametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote: 5t25
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
Aint no way you said this to this guy. Aint no way. Do you have any idea how long this dude have tried to make a change?Anaxii wrote: 3s5x72
criticizing it in this way won't make things any better ngl.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
yes, I'm actively criticizing itsametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote: 5t25
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
idk I thought the joke was funnyAnaxii wrote: 3s5x72
criticizing it in this way won't make things any better ngl.Patatitta wrote: 5t25
yes, I'm actively criticizing itsametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote: 5t25
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
no, corne literally asked who is against blushingManishh wrote: 2k5q58
thats how we are talking about this topic, no?Arctos Sagittario wrote: 6dk2h
personally I’d prefer the blushing denizenship issue should be talked as “why or why not the complaints are valid”, not “who’s having problem”
making this thing personal will not be constructive
NOTICE 2v66t
As decided in the vote regarding denizenship, Blushing has been removed from the denizen list until they meet the requirements to be denizen.
starting dancing jumpstyle when i read thisCorne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p
NOTICE 2v66t
As decided in the vote regarding denizenship, Blushing has been removed from the denizen list until they meet the requirements to be denizen.
sorry blushing
Don't worry, we have a back up https://web.archive.org/web/20240314001450/https://osu-ppy-sh.jeuxcrack.net/community/forums/topics/868035?n=1
You didn't hear the news? The guy sitting in the president chair has a personal vendetta against the denizens thing. Rumor is, he wants to burn this whole place to the ground. You and me are both in gen 10, I reckon. The gen that was always paired up with the 9th, ? Been a long time since I recited these numbers… It's over now. None of this matters. All the friends, all the lovers, all the enemies, all the rivals we've made are now not even dwellers, but simple bystanders.sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
wait what..??Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
Posting here one last time before everything burns to ashes.
If this continues on, I will have no choice but to call for an open rebellion.
Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
You didn't hear the news? The guy sitting in the president chair has a personal vendetta against the denizens thing. Rumor is, he wants to burn this whole place to the ground. You and me are both in gen 10, I reckon. The gen that was always paired up with the 9th, ? Been a long time since I recited these numbers… It's over now. None of this matters. All the friends, all the lovers, all the enemies, all the rivals we've made are now not even dwellers, but simple bystanders.sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s
wait what..??Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma
Posting here one last time before everything burns to ashes.
If this continues on, I will have no choice but to call for an open rebellion.