Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

Were there really not that many people posting during early OT years? I have to do some investigation on that…

I took from the denizen list, the denizen requirement were low so I expect abraker calculations to hold up, also, I dqed a lot of people that were once considered denizen because they did not meet in standard

eblf2013 wrote: 331669

I started in January 2020, technically 2019 in FG. You might check OT chronicles to see when did denizens appear.

I think I did check a month ago but forgot, anyways, thanks for confirming

cephaphysic wrote: 1o5144

1. neat concept. i'll make a note to reference it for the next ot!collab

2. i changed my name (again). octowave -> cephaphysic. just to make sure it's accurate

there are a bunch of outdated names on the list, will change

Manishh wrote: 2k5q58

Its ugly. You should use profile just like how the main denizenship thread does.

that was the idea, however, I explained why is it this way on this thread and also my previous

Dementedduck wrote: 3c2da

why i not here ;-;

mainly took people from denizen, also, you dont qualify for 2022 as you barely just were for 3 months and a half

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

Dementedduck wrote: 3c2da

why i not here ;-;

10 months posting we are forgotten

you also dont qualify for 2022, started in october, you would at least start from september first

keremaru wrote: 3r6e2u

Please add me to '17 and '18. (:
(I also changed my UN to keremaru around 2020.)

oh yeah you too have a too long post story, didn't notice, will add

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Thread good

thanks

Good

boo

nice

me maybe

lostsilver wrote: q37e

me maybe

your osu creation date is too late

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

me maybe

your osu creation date is too late

???
whats that mean

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

me maybe

your osu creation date is too late

???
whats that mean

you need at least 4 months of threads in ot in a single year, you created your in november 2022, even if you posted day 1 of your creation, that would not make 4 months

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

me maybe

your osu creation date is too late

???
whats that mean

you need at least 4 months of threads in ot in a single year, you created your in november 2022, even if you posted day 1 of your creation, that would not make 4 months

so how many more months do i have to wait

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

me maybe

your osu creation date is too late

???
whats that mean

you need at least 4 months of threads in ot in a single year, you created your in november 2022, even if you posted day 1 of your creation, that would not make 4 months

so how many more months do i have to wait

4 months, the rules are explained in the thread

How do people not understand the 4 month thing? It seems pretty clear to me

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

me maybe

your osu creation date is too late

???
whats that mean

you need at least 4 months of threads in ot in a single year, you created your in november 2022, even if you posted day 1 of your creation, that would not make 4 months

so how many more months do i have to wait

4 months, the rules are explained in the thread

ok
ty

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

How do people not understand the 4 month thing? It seems pretty clear to me

im just dense

-Remi wrote: 103k2t

I started in 2021

Oh wait did I have to be active 4 months within 2021 to be considered for it (I'm pretty sure I might have been, idk)

-Remi wrote: 103k2t

-Remi wrote: 103k2t

I started in 2021

Oh wait did I have to be active 4 months within 2021 to be considered for it (I'm pretty sure I might have been, idk)

you have less than a page of posts in 2021

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

-Remi wrote: 103k2t

-Remi wrote: 103k2t

I started in 2021

Oh wait did I have to be active 4 months within 2021 to be considered for it (I'm pretty sure I might have been, idk)

you have less than a page of posts in 2021

Ohhh okaei

I started posting in OT in September 2022 (Dang it's already been a year). So I would've been here for only 3 months by the start of 2023.

Wait no, that was in forum games. I didn't start talking in OT until October 2022.

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

-In order to be added to an era, you must have at least 5 pages of posts/threads in OT (250 posts!), and be present for over 4 months of the year. Mafia/forum games does not count

oops i have caused the confusion me amigos

I need to farm more posts...

Gay era where

Scyla wrote: 1d6q5d

Gay era where

now

heipizhu wrote: 3io63

I need to farm more posts...

just to not just post because you want the post number, then it just ends up like GD or whatever, try actually contributing to the conversation and only responding to threads you actually care about

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

Were there really not that many people posting during early OT years? I have to do some investigation on that…

I took from the denizen list, the denizen requirement were low so I expect abraker calculations to hold up, also, I dqed a lot of people that were once considered denizen because they did not meet in standard

What would you know, I did an independent (lesson learned, never trust the government) research and found names that are missing. Some are more preeminent, others are more mysterious. Perhaps, some names were simply erased as time went by or it could be an intentional cover-up… Whichever it is, we must find the truth together.


An observation: a lot of people seem to only be active starting in the second half of 2009. Is there some reason for that? I'll continue on my journey through dusty archives later, for now I'll try to lay low for a bit. I think someone is tailing me, but rest assured I'll get back to you saf

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

Were there really not that many people posting during early OT years? I have to do some investigation on that…

I took from the denizen list, the denizen requirement were low so I expect abraker calculations to hold up, also, I dqed a lot of people that were once considered denizen because they did not meet in standard

What would you know, I did an independent (lesson learned, never trust the government) research and found names that are missing. Some are more preeminent, others are more mysterious. Perhaps, some names were simply erased as time went by or it could be an intentional cover-up… Whichever it is, we must find the truth together.

should meet the post count requirement for 2007-08, if you consider Other subforums to count.
s/1079 LUIGI

2007 2008 2010 side note: 2009 is barely ing, maybe you should recount the amount of posts in 2009 as I could be wrong
s/4018 MOGSY

2009
s/14931 SUBURU

2009 2010 2011
s/179449 POWER

2009 2011
s/42460 SLEEP

2010
s/37224 PRIEST

2010 2012 2013 2014
s/23326 GLADI

2012
s/66296 AZURE

An observation: a lot of people seem to only be active starting in the second half of 2009. Is there some reason for that? I'll continue on my journey through dusty archives later, for now I'll try to lay low for a bit. I think someone is tailing me, but rest assured I'll get back to you saf

thank your for your work, will fact-check those profiles and add them to the list

Edit: Added most of them, only, Mogsy does not qualify for 2019 and power for 2009

also, I swear I had seen the azure_kite/james profile during my research, but I did not include it in my documents for some weird reason? idk exactly why

can you not use my old name please? i genuinely feel embarrassed

[ Rynn ] wrote: 4f5l6o

can you not use my old name please? i genuinely feel embarrassed

oh yeah my bad, I thought I changed all the names to their most recent version but I did not check your profile as I did recognise your previous name and forgot that you changed it

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

[ Rynn ] wrote: 4f5l6o

can you not use my old name please? i genuinely feel embarrassed

oh yeah my bad, I thought I changed all the names to their most recent version but I did not check your profile as I did recognise your previous name and forgot that you changed it

lmao its okay

Make OT great again!

Free yourself off of the denizen rule!

Glory to OT!

Heil Patatitta!

Greeteings My True Name Is skyNEKOCRAZY3000 And Im Very Kawaii >_< uwu :3 I Like Watchign Anime~

Best Regards,
skyNEKOCRAZY3000

Edit: Double Posted By Acciodent Sorry =_= XD

Serraionga wrote: 2r3s1z

Greeteings My True Name Is skyNEKOCRAZY3000 And Im Very Kawaii >_< uwu :3 I Like Watchign Anime~

Best Regards,
skyNEKOCRAZY3000

updated your name!

×

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

-Abraker has more post history than the one that the osu website allows me to browse (200 pages), which means, their placing is probably inaccurate. If you know for certain which years they were active, please, let me know

I've been active since mid 2015. Ctrl+F for my name in the chronicles dude

Back with more gifts. This is the new list with the names they don't want you to know about, keep it safe. I must say, having years and not generations gets you a better perspective on how OT was changing. Some people shine brighty and burn out fast, others start meekly and then bloom into robust denizens. Then there're people like abraker, who epitomize the best of both worlds. Fascinating, really…

I dislike this in the sense that postcount doesn't reflect impact.
There have been some individuals that were memorable if only for the fact that their ratio of quality posts was wildly exceeding that of other denizens while still showing a modicum of activity to be considered part of the landscape.
As an example of that I would like to call out schism.
Although few in posts and partially lost to the currents of time as their expressive image usage can no longer be witnessed due to dead links, he's one of the posters of my "era" I will never forget.
Every single time I saw a new thread by them I was immediately excited because there was no doubt it was going to be good before even clicking on it. In that sense, schism is much more memorable to me than many shitposters from "my time" and due to their strong and consistent roleplaying my impression of them is much more clear than that of some other posters of my time.

While I won't bother to argue against acceptance through quantity to cater to those uninspired and lacking in creativity, this should never lead to quality posters not being recognized.
None should ever feel forced to vomit a load of garbage into this subforum to gain some accolade of questionable value and be accepted by those rolling around in the mud and racking up their postcount with head-keyboard-smashes. Get good.

Ultimately, just be aware that that denizen list never followed any criteria but was basically just a subjective "people that were memorable part of the landscape" impression by abraker. None cared at the time and it was just a funny thing in hindsight. faiswusuf didn't have nearly enough posts to qualify according to your new criteria originally but they became a central part of subforum culture in a flash, overshadowing poor plotter.

Endaris wrote: 6j5f7

I dislike this in the sense that postcount doesn't reflect impact.
There have been some individuals that were memorable if only for the fact that their ratio of quality posts was wildly exceeding that of other denizens while still showing a modicum of activity to be considered part of the landscape.
As an example of that I would like to call out schism.
Although few in posts and partially lost to the currents of time as their expressive image usage can no longer be witnessed due to dead links, he's one of the posters of my "era" I will never forget.
Every single time I saw a new thread by them I was immediately excited because there was no doubt it was going to be good before even clicking on it. In that sense, schism is much more memorable to me than many shitposters from "my time" and due to their strong and consistent roleplaying my impression of them is much more clear than that of some other posters of my time.

While I won't bother to argue against acceptance through quantity to cater to those uninspired and lacking in creativity, this should never lead to quality posters not being recognized.
None should ever feel forced to vomit a load of garbage into this subforum to gain some accolade of questionable value and be accepted by those rolling around in the mud and racking up their postcount with head-keyboard-smashes. Get good.

I agree, at some years the post count is especially useless, for example at the height of "ITT: neither funny nor interesting" threads it mostly consisted of low-effort posting, however the impact of eras is not the same as getting the denizen status, since you don't really need to be recognized by anyone, the minimum requirement is simple to achieve for anyone really, there's no real need to even post useless messages.

What this system does achieve better is recording and preserving a historical landscape of OT, you get a better grasp of people who were posting in the past, you can see people fading away or suddenly popping and disappearing. The overlap of s is especially good, because once you get the denizenship, that's it, you get tied to a specific generation even if you were active for entire generations.

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

What this system does achieve better is recording and preserving a historical landscape of OT, you get a better grasp of people who were posting in the past, you can see people fading away or suddenly popping and disappearing. The overlap of s is especially good, because once you get the denizenship, that's it, you get tied to a specific generation even if you were active for entire generations.

That's just an activity chart though.
I'm sure if you mention this to abraker and lock him inside his lab for a couple hours he'll write some script to scour OT for each poster's posts per month and then come up with some ultrawack visualization until someone bugs him enough to make the data public read-only and presents it better.

Although perhaps interesting to see, that kind of distinction lacks a human component and it lacks what makes this subforum OT - subjectivity, chaos, drama.
And finally I think everyone here is still being molded by their "generation". Simply due to the fact that OT becomes stale over time and the same random shit isn't always funny for no reason again with new people.

Tbh, next people will yell for their threads to be added to OT chronicles - which are just as subjective as the denizen crap. Both are different variants of randomly recording history.

Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.

Apraxye wrote: 372b1y

Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.

lazy ass mf

Cerno wrote: 6g571s

Apraxye wrote: 372b1y

Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.

lazy ass mf

Oh, crikey. It’s the rozzer.

Apraxye wrote: 372b1y

Cerno wrote: 6g571s

Apraxye wrote: 372b1y

Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.

lazy ass mf

Oh crikey it’s the rozzer.

puck you

Anaxii wrote: 3s5x72

×

Endaris wrote: 6j5f7

I dislike this in the sense that postcount doesn't reflect impact.
There have been some individuals that were memorable if only for the fact that their ratio of quality posts was wildly exceeding that of other denizens while still showing a modicum of activity to be considered part of the landscape.
As an example of that I would like to call out schism.
Although few in posts and partially lost to the currents of time as their expressive image usage can no longer be witnessed due to dead links, he's one of the posters of my "era" I will never forget.
Every single time I saw a new thread by them I was immediately excited because there was no doubt it was going to be good before even clicking on it. In that sense, schism is much more memorable to me than many shitposters from "my time" and due to their strong and consistent roleplaying my impression of them is much more clear than that of some other posters of my time.

While I won't bother to argue against acceptance through quantity to cater to those uninspired and lacking in creativity, this should never lead to quality posters not being recognized.
None should ever feel forced to vomit a load of garbage into this subforum to gain some accolade of questionable value and be accepted by those rolling around in the mud and racking up their postcount with head-keyboard-smashes. Get good.

Ultimately, just be aware that that denizen list never followed any criteria but was basically just a subjective "people that were memorable part of the landscape" impression by abraker. None cared at the time and it was just a funny thing in hindsight. faiswusuf didn't have nearly enough posts to qualify according to your new criteria originally but they became a central part of subforum culture in a flash, overshadowing poor plotter.

read my previous post, it's linked on this thread. This is not supposed to reflect impact, this is just an objective messurement of who was active at which time, nothing more, nothing else, also the osu!chronicles is really akward to use for this same reasons.

Also due to the changes to the denizen system over the years, it's really nto even useful to see impact either, the only way ot really have a pure impact of influence would be to remake it again with that intention all over again

where me

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

where me

You only have 4 pages of posts on 2022, not 5

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Also due to the changes to the denizen system over the years, it's really nto even useful to see impact either, the only way ot really have a pure impact of influence would be to remake it again with that intention all over again

Exactly this, and since people who would know who was impactful in the past are long gone it's basically impossible, even if you read everything in OT you don't have the context of being there when it happened/being part of it

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

-Abraker has more post history than the one that the osu website allows me to browse (200 pages), which means, their placing is probably inaccurate. If you know for certain which years they were active, please, let me know

I've been active since mid 2015. Ctrl+F for my name in the chronicles dude

yeah got it right initially, was just fact-checking


also added the new ones kobold sent

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

where me

You only have 4 pages of posts on 2022, not 5

:skull:

ClevelandsMyBro wrote: 58np

Apraxye wrote: 372b1y

Cerno wrote: 6g571s

Apraxye wrote: 372b1y

Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.

lazy ass mf

Oh crikey it’s the rozzer.

puck you

No, you.

Apraxye wrote: 372b1y

ClevelandsMyBro wrote: 58np

Apraxye wrote: 372b1y

Cerno wrote: 6g571s

Apraxye wrote: 372b1y

Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.

lazy ass mf

Oh crikey it’s the rozzer.

puck you

No you

Stop insulting pls

I looked through my posts and discovered I made 23 and a half pages worth of posts in 2022!

Crazy considering I only started posting in October of that year.

[ Sebastian ] wrote: 143do

I looked through my posts and discovered I made 23 and a half pages worth of posts in 2022!

Crazy considering I only started posting in October of that year.

Yes... it is in fact crazy...

More stuff from the good old times, going to reconnoiter through archives again. Reading through ancient threads is fun, you should try it too! Side note: HUGE shift must've happened in late 2012, a lot of the posts were made by new people, all oldies from before either left or were barely active.

add a 2023

luminar wrote: 4d6n6k

add a 2023

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

This thread is updated at the end of each year

i would like to sign up

wow, didn't know i was active for the last 9 years

Goodbye everyone.

ColdTooth wrote: 1g2nr

wow, didn't know i was active for the last 9 years

Goodbye everyone.

See you in 2024.

loserotaku wrote: 187318

i would like to sign up

lol

loserotaku wrote: 187318

i would like to sign up

yes our king

loserotaku wrote: 187318

i would like to sign up

no need, everyone is in by default

edit: added the newest kobold findings

2013 was insane, like 200 different people were in charge of making threads, half of them were locked and most of these people left OT shortly after. You encounter someone new once and then never see them ever again in OT. You can feel a massive, drastic drop in quality, it was devastating. I'm tearing up just watching the awful state of OT during that time. Is it because of everyone migrating to ITT2?
By the power bestowed in me by me I hereby name this era the "Dark Ages". This will be on the test, so prepare accordingly.

Then there's Eph.



Okay well, back to the topic (also there are two Hikas in 2013 and the name of Trash Boat is incorrectly written in 2014/15).

adding me?

Aya_f wrote: 3zy2v

adding me?

you dont qualify for 2022, but you do for 2023, so wait a couple months that I add everyone from 2023

also thanks you kobold, will add


also old ephemeral posts are insane

surprisingly large person list

my first post in OT was on the 1st of january 2016 at 2AM in UTC+1, so in the US it was still 2015.

Put me in 2015.

Zain Sugieres wrote: 2n3vj

my first post in OT was on the 1st of january 2016 at 2AM in UTC+1, so in the US it was still 2015.

Put me in 2015.

you would have needed to start posting 1st of september 2015, 4 months and 5 pages of posts to be included, rules are explained in the thread

i ain't reading the rules put me in 2015

I feel like the 2023 list will be larger than the 2022 list because of how many people like me who only started posting in late 2022.

after recounting, I updated the list with everyone kobold said

also, I love how you're just seeing the ITT 2 thread and catching absolutely everyone

There are still two Hikas in 2013 and Trash Boat is misspelled (it's not Thrash).

bump

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

after recounting, I updated the list with everyone kobold said

also, I love how you're just seeing the ITT 2 thread and catching absolutely everyone

Would be surprising if anyone met the requirements without having ever posted in ITT 2, at least since it was started

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

There are still two Hikas in 2013 and Trash Boat is misspelled (it's not Thrash).

bump

ah sorry I missed that text, fixing

Patatitta, do you have a list of denizens who did not make it? I just had an idea that they could qualify if we take into wastelanded threads. Might not work for everyone, but some really fringe cases could be resolved with this.

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

Patatitta, do you have a list of denizens who did not make it? I just had an idea that they could qualify if we take into wastelanded threads. Might not work for everyone, but some really fringe cases could be resolved with this.

yes, this was my list

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

Patatitta, do you have a list of denizens who did not make it? I just had an idea that they could qualify if we take into wastelanded threads. Might not work for everyone, but some really fringe cases could be resolved with this.

yes, this was my list

Strager ban
Ippe ban
dkun has been DQed from denizen
flanter is weird
Broken arrow DQ
Jazz DQ
Jesse1412 DQ
sakura only plays mafia??????????
The gambler DQ
GSG95 DQ
Green Platinum DQ
jaaakb DQ
Momi DQ
Dawnsday DQ
Roseus jager ban
Fourth dq
ashton Ban
Flannel DQ
Schism DQ
Nanachii DQ
Alexkuzi DQ
Wolfette ban
Zozimoto DQ
Saturnalize DQ
Kittyneko DQ
Puzzle DQ
Eblf too long
abraker too long

I... am... WHAT?
Uh... thanks ig.

Not many names this time. I don't think my methodology is wrong, it's just that… there wasn't a lot of people posting at a constant rate in 2013-2015, everyone was mostly isolated in ITT2. If you ever think current threads are bad, look into 2014-2015 threads and be amazed how good you have it.


SHOULD BE FIXED: there is Vext and Vext_old in both 2011 and 2012, my bad.

That’s a very nice concept. I could do the pfps on every ot if u want to (including the banned s if possible)

The new osu web layout would make more sense due to the old forum website being nonexistent right now

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

That’s a very nice concept. I could do the pfps on every ot if u want to (including the banned s if possible)

The new osu web layout would make more sense due to the old forum website being nonexistent right now

https://old.ppy.sh/u/27597380

But it's going away soon, should archive profiles ASAP. I would say pre-2018 eras should have old-style pages.

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

That’s a very nice concept. I could do the pfps on every ot if u want to (including the banned s if possible)

The new osu web layout would make more sense due to the old forum website being nonexistent right now

https://old.ppy.sh/u/27597380

But it's going away soon, should archive profiles ASAP. I would say pre-2018 eras should have old-style pages.

idk, if I added images it would probably just be regular current page screnshots to make it easier, tho the idea of using wayback to screenshot the when they used OT is interesting

Zain Sugieres wrote: 2n3vj

i ain't reading the rules put me in 2015

Old man

Anaxii wrote: 3s5x72

Zain Sugieres wrote: 2n3vj

i ain't reading the rules put me in 2015

Old man

stfu kid

Zain Sugieres wrote: 2n3vj

Anaxii wrote: 3s5x72

Zain Sugieres wrote: 2n3vj

i ain't reading the rules put me in 2015

Old man

stfu kid

OLD MAN

Anaxii wrote: 3s5x72

Zain Sugieres wrote: 2n3vj

i ain't reading the rules put me in 2015

Old man

stfu kid

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

Not many names this time. I don't think my methodology is wrong, it's just that… there wasn't a lot of people posting at a constant rate in 2013-2015, everyone was mostly isolated in ITT2. If you ever think current threads are bad, look into 2014-2015 threads and be amazed how good you have it.

some things never change

SHOULD BE FIXED: there is Vext and Vext_old in both 2011 and 2012, my bad.

2012
s/804584 FRIZZ

2014
s/4124962 SPARKY

2014 2015
s/3496632 PIRU

2015
s/3260726 GAMBLER

2016
s/5126159 GSG

bump

missed it sorry, will make it later

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

[ - Zekks - ]

omg thats me!!

Hi Zekks

Zekks wrote: 102o9

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

[ - Zekks - ]

omg thats me!!

welcome back

Hi Zekks!

what if I was in here as acroba

updated, sorry for delay

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

updated, sorry for delay

Vext and Vext_old are still fighting for the spot in 2011 and 2012 (only one shall be left standing).

Kobold84 wrote: 4c5ma

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

updated, sorry for delay

Vext and Vext_old are still fighting for the spot in 2011 and 2012 (only one shall be left standing).

okay so it happens that I read the post, and then, after a while, I do the changes, and when I do the changes, I only read the big [notice] block so I keep missing this, will keep in mind to also re-read the rest of the things for the future

2 week bump ^^

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

2 week bump ^^

Why?

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

2 week bump ^^

Why?

Why not ^^

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

2 week bump ^^

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Why not ^^

WARNING: PARALLEL POSTING SEQUENCE DETECTED!

[First portal]
(Click on the special portal below to initiate the parallel posting sequence.)

[/First portal]

maybe i'll be added when this year ends :>

Serraionga wrote: 2r3s1z

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

2 week bump ^^

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Why not ^^

WARNING: PARALLEL POSTING SEQUENCE DETECTED!

[First portal]
(Click on the special portal below to initiate the parallel posting sequence.)

[/First portal]

Serraionga wrote: 2r3s1z

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

2 week bump ^^

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Why not ^^

WARNING: PARALLEL POSTING SEQUENCE DETECTED!

[First portal]
(Click on the special portal below to initiate the parallel posting sequence.)

[/First portal]