Aurani wrote: k3n52

I'm willing to bet my ass that you're younger than 20 so you claim that. Of course a 15yo will be attractive to someone barely out of puberty.

This, absolutely. Young girls tend to be seen as attractive by other kids, or shut-ins who haven't had much with the opposite sex

Actually, it doesn't stand to reason that men's sexual preferences would drastically change with their age, men don't suddenly become attracted to grannies as they become older, pretty sure most men would get with a younger women if they could. Typically, rich and powerful men have younger wives than normal.

As I've already noted, I haven't been talking about whether it's alright for older men to be in relationships with 15 year olds, just that attraction is normal. So perhaps we can get past these nonsense inferrals that anyone who finds anyone below 20 attractive has something wrong with them. Also, I don't think you understand what incest means.

I haven't been arguing between "alright/normal" either, I just told you that you were projecting your own beliefs. You believe it's a normal thing, but that's an assumption. I think most people wouldn't agree that grown men are generally attracted to girls who haven't even finished puberty; just because they CAN have a baby, that doesn't mean they're entirely developed and sexually attractive to most adults, you understand?

Explain your incest line, since it seems especially thoughtless. Incest is sexual relations between family, nothing more.

To be honest, Daddy, I don't think we'll gain much by trying to discuss that topic here of all places. Osu is chock-full of kids, shut-ins, socially inept individuals as well as anime lovers, so it stands to reason that you'd find this much opposition when it comes to paedophilia and general attraction to younger girls.
As such, it'd be more reasonable to attempt to communicate with a fucking wall than this bunch.

I guess. I do enjoy educating people when it comes to moral arguments against incest though, it's a pretty well-known taboo subject but most people couldn't actually argue rationally for why it is bad unless they've seen such discussions already

Rather, you're just projecting your own beliefs. I'm not defining "normal" as "whatever is the norm is society", because that's just completely arbitrary and changes from one century to the next. It's likely that people mold their sexual preferences based on societal pressures, and I think that human sexuality is much more plastic than most people realise. So, considering this, it stands to reason that the most reliable way to measure whether it's "normal" or not would be based on biological fertility. So I can say that being attracted to pre-pubescent girls is abnormal, but simply being attracted to a teenage girl who is showing secondary sex characteristics is not abnormal. It doesn't have to be one's most preferred age but I think you'd have a hard time arguing that, biases notwithstanding, older men have no attraction to girls under 18.

And I'm not sure what you are talking about with incest, you mischaracterised it by implying that the main problem with it was of two people "being at seperate stages of life". The problem with incest is it produces babies with birth defects. But there is nothing immoral about having an incestuous relationship if the couple doesn't have a baby, even if it may be a bit creepy.

Milkshake wrote: 1v5s1i

Nice graph.

Children's nyquil is the best cure for stuffy no's.

johnmedina999 wrote: 3r3a6s

Nice sig Maho

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

The problem with incest is it produces babies with birth defects. But there is nothing immoral about having an incestuous relationship if the couple doesn't have a baby, even if it may be a bit creepy.

Many people feel that incest is immoral even without pregnancy being involved, i.e. using protection or same-sex relationships. They can't usually argue why such a thing would be immoral, though.


(The reason is the power dynamic creates an inherent problem with establishing consent, which seems to be a topic that mr B1rd doesn't understand, so that conversation isn't exactly gonna go anywhere)

The best part about screwing twenty six year olds is that there's 20 of them.

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

The problem with incest is it produces babies with birth defects. But there is nothing immoral about having an incestuous relationship if the couple doesn't have a baby, even if it may be a bit creepy.

Many people feel that incest is immoral even without pregnancy being involved, i.e. using protection or same-sex relationships. They can't usually argue why such a thing would be immoral, though.


(The reason is the power dynamic creates an inherent problem with establishing consent, which seems to be a topic that mr B1rd doesn't understand, so that conversation isn't exactly gonna go anywhere)

Are you really gonna pull out some nonsense argument that fully-grown adults somehow can't establish consent?

Comfy Slippers wrote: 4v5r2f

The best part about screwing twenty six year olds is that there's 20 of them.

This is why hyphens exist.

Comfy Slippers wrote: 4v5r2f

The best part about screwing twenty six year olds is that there's 20 of them.

whathappenswhenyoudonthirecopyeditors.jpg

It really depends on the relationship @B1rd

A father and his daughter will probably have some pretty deep-rooted power dynamic shit going on, even if the daughter is an adult, y'know? But yeah, it is generally a case-by-case thing

You could say that there are power dynamics in a million of other cases too. But regardless, it's arbitrary. Adults make their own choices and have responsibility for their own lives. It's no one else's right to impose their will upon the lives of mentally valid adults concerning what relationships they can or cannot have.

Raspberriel, initial UR hanayo is the saddest UR ever. no one will recover her spaghetti hands.

also B1rd, yes, it is a nice graph. I wish I didn't lose the source though

@B1rd you're referring to Ephebophilia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia

That still doesn't mean that fucking a 15 year-old is ok just because they've completed puberty. They can't really consent to a relationship with someone of 18 or older because of brain development as well.

In the US, the age of consent is 18 but it really should be 21 because physiologically the human brain isn't developed until your 20s because of the frontal lobe (which controls decision making and logical judgement)

In regards to pedophilia, if you're sexually attracted to a drawn character that looks 12 that is different than actually being attracted to real girls. However, it can be a warning sign for those who are mentally ill and are pedophiles. Just saying, you wanna be careful and not become a disgusting pedophile.

RoseusJaeger wrote: x175n

@B1rd you're referring to Ephebophilia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia

That still doesn't mean that fucking a 15 year-old is ok just because they've completed puberty. They can't really consent to a relationship with someone of 18 or older because of brain development as well.

In the US, the age of consent is 18 but it really should be 21 because physiologically the human brain isn't developed until your 20s because of the frontal lobe (which controls decision making and logical judgement)

In regards to pedophilia, if you're sexually attracted to a drawn character that looks 12 that is different than actually being attracted to real girls. However, it can be a warning sign for those who are mentally ill and are pedophiles. Just saying, you wanna be careful and not become a disgusting pedophile.

Redundant. Nothing you've said rebuts anything I've said. And I'm pretty sure that looking at loli pics won't make me a "disgusting paedophile". Regardless, nothing wrong with being a paedophile as long as they don't hurt anyone. If you're left-wing, actually be tolerant for once.

Milkshake wrote: 1v5s1i

Raspberriel, initial UR hanayo is the saddest UR ever. no one will recover her spaghetti hands.

also B1rd, yes, it is a nice graph. I wish I didn't lose the source though

Feels bad having sourceless graphs.

Also, something else that was brought to me attention: http://puu.sh/wDQmR/4c1577378b.webm

As someone who wants to be a translator myself, I find this absolutely disgusting - to insert LGBT progressive agenda where it doesn't belong. Not only that, but it completely changes the meaning and is completely contrary to how that character was written. Everyone who works at Funimation deserves to be crucified.

Hm.


Anyway, how is everyone ?

I'm calling 10000% bullshit on those graphs Bird, at least when it comes to countries on the Balkan.

i hate kids

Madvillain wrote: 2v6e3b

i hate kids

cmon bro ur literally handing someone a 'but ur a kid urself' meme on a silver platter and they arent exactly wrong either

lets think about what we type before we

lol wrote: k2335

cmon bro ur literally handing someone a 'but ur a kid urself' meme on a silver platter and they arent exactly wrong either

Stop reading my mind.

i got the responses i expected so it was funny lmao

Why wasn't the earthquake right below Villain's house? Gods, why must you punish me so?

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Why wasn't the earthquake right below Villain's house? Gods, why must you punish me so?

don't know why
the gdp has 188 memebrs

i want a fanclub

jokes on u, I already have a fan club

"fanclub"
"fan club"
Clock spider time!

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

RoseusJaeger wrote: x175n

@B1rd you're referring to Ephebophilia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia

That still doesn't mean that fucking a 15 year-old is ok just because they've completed puberty. They can't really consent to a relationship with someone of 18 or older because of brain development as well.

In the US, the age of consent is 18 but it really should be 21 because physiologically the human brain isn't developed until your 20s because of the frontal lobe (which controls decision making and logical judgement)

In regards to pedophilia, if you're sexually attracted to a drawn character that looks 12 that is different than actually being attracted to real girls. However, it can be a warning sign for those who are mentally ill and are pedophiles. Just saying, you wanna be careful and not become a disgusting pedophile.

Redundant. Nothing you've said rebuts anything I've said. And I'm pretty sure that looking at loli pics won't make me a "disgusting paedophile". Regardless, nothing wrong with being a paedophile as long as they don't hurt anyone. If you're left-wing, actually be tolerant for once.

I'm not even trying to argue with you and I'm not calling you a pedophile for looking at pics of drawn lolis. If you looked at real children then you'd really be scum. I'm not making any accusations but stating my thoughts on the issue.

Edit: Adding the left wing statement means nothing on a topic about the abuse of fucking children

lol

I'm ambivalent about people watching real child pornography. Merely watching something isn't the same as participating in it. If we were to stay consistent we would have to say that watching gore videos, Isis executions and whatnot was just as bad.

If hating pedophiles is being intolerant then sign me up for the fucking KKK

Depends entirely on how frequently you watch it.

Humans have an insatiable drive for curiosity, but if you enjoy watching an ISIS execution or some negro penetrating a 4 year old child on a regular basis, you're fucked up, period.

No doubt, but being a fucked up person shouldn't be illegal, what really matters is if you're contributing to the creation of the content. Simply saving things to your hard drive doesn't do that.

Tbh I've seen and heard of SO many disgusting and outright revolting fetishes that make your statement quite true indeed. However, you must also realise that most people who own hard drives full of child porn are also those who either produce it or help in said production.

I would not make it legal to arrest you if you watch that sort of shit, since so many of equally disgusting fetishes are perfectly legal, but I would personally not consider you a human being and would outright want to exterminate you and everyone else who takes pleasure in such things.

So far Castlevania is as good as I hoped it would be.

I would expect nothing less from Trevor fucking Belmont.

Faust wrote: 3h473k

So far Castlevania is as good as I hoped it would be.

>Season 2 in 2018

Yeah I can wait.

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

1000x better than the "official" translation I posted previously.

Lots of Japanese words, name suffixes etc. don't translate into English well, so they should be kept as they are, especially since 99% of people who watch anime are weebs and will understand shit like "itadakimasu". A lot of times when I've watched anime, I pick up on some of the Japanese and realise it actually conveyed a different meaning than what the subs were saying.

wow same tbh

https://www.equestriadaily.com/2017/07/ ... rriam.html

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

https://www.equestriadaily.com/2017/07/ponify-added-to-open-source-merriam.html

Thanks for reminding us all why bronies were one of the worst communities

"We're slowly taking over the whole world, aren't we?"

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

https://www.equestriadaily.com/2017/07/ponify-added-to-open-source-merriam.html

Thanks for reminding us all why bronies were one of the worst communities

itt: Contributing to the advancement of the English language makes you a horrible community

i dont think ponify is a necessary word it seems like too much to me

Aurani wrote: k3n52

"We're slowly taking over the whole world, aren't we?"

me on the bottom middle

would anyone other than bronies actually use that word

I'm clopping

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

itt: Contributing to the advancement of the English language makes you a horrible community

It's a TV show created to market toys to children.

Mahogany is baiting y'all lol

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

i dont think ponify is a necessary word it seems like too much to me

on another topic, your avatar is great

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

Mahogany is baiting y'all lol

I want to believe that too.

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

Mahogany is baiting y'all lol

you must be new here

fuck, i wish

idk why ur all hating so much i watched an episode of mlp a few days ago and it was actually pretty interesting

Tbh most cartoons nowadays are complete fucking trash. I grew up on Disney and then I see shit like Winx Club and similar cancer and I suddenly realise why I want to nuke half the population of Earth.

I grew up on USSR cartoons and it was great. Nowadays children should watch kemono friends its best show

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

on another topic, your avatar is great

thank you <3

In the belief of our pursuit of freedom, socialism and democracy to achieve the society of sufficiency, justice and equality,
get the pork chops.

Madvillain wrote: 2v6e3b

would anyone other than bronies actually use that word

Probably not, no, why

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

It's a TV show created to market toys to children.

your point being?

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

i dont think ponify is a necessary word it seems like too much to me

i dont think transmogrify is a necessary word but it has its place and its uses

blondes irl must have blond pubes or riot

Meah wrote: f4f5b

blondes irl must have blond pubes or riot

They usually do

Blitzfrog wrote: 2a3s

Meah wrote: f4f5b

blondes irl must have blond pubes or riot

They usually do

What are your sources?

those who dye their hair is no exemption

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

Raspberriel wrote: 2f96m

on another topic, your avatar is great

thank you <3

IF YOU CAN SEND ME THIS UR HOME IT'D BE GREAT. FUCK RNG GOD.

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

I grew up on USSR cartoons and it was great.

commie propaganda

s

Comfy Slippers wrote: 4v5r2f

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

I grew up on USSR cartoons and it was great.

commie propaganda

Nah, USSR cartoons were incredibly well-drawn and always had a nice story behind it, but sadly didn't have the budget of the West at the time. Most Soviet-block cartoons were actually drawn by people who didn't like Socialism all that much.

Does anyone who lives under socialism like socialism? I thought it was just liberal teenagers in rich capitalist nations.

You'll find very little evidence of people loving living under Socialism besides delusional fanatics (looking at you, Balkan) or those who never actually lived under it.

It's funny because Erasmus' quote "War is delightful to those who have had no experience of it." applies perfectly when it comes to those liberals in the West and their thoughts about Socialism.

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

I grew up on USSR cartoons and it was great. Nowadays children should watch kemono friends its best show

Same. I still have some video cassettes of those.

Scooby Doo?

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

i dont think ponify is a necessary word it seems like too much to me

i dont think transmogrify is a necessary word but it has its place and its uses

umh what

Meah wrote: f4f5b

Scooby Doo?

where are you?

Tilt on English wrote: e3r3c

Meah wrote: f4f5b

Scooby Doo?

where are you?

hoo?

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

itt: Contributing to the advancement of the English language makes you a horrible community

Mahogany, if you say advancement you're implying that there's some sort of goal. Furthermore, you're implying that the invention of the word "ponify" somehow moved us closer to that goal.

If the goal of language is to have the general population communicate as efficiently as possible, then adding useless clutter to the dictionaries can hardly be called an "advancement".
That shit belongs on urban dictionary. Not in a real dictionary.

Adding or taking away words is a change, but not necessarily an advancement. You need change for advancement, but not every change constitutes an advancement.

It's not clutter if it has good uses

i cant imagine many people other than bronies or little kids using it tbh and even then it doesnt belong in an actual dictionary

Aomi wrote: 2q6w66

i cant imagine many people other than little kids or little kids using it tbh and even then it doesnt belong in an actual dictionary

:thinking:

Not to mention it'll be completely gone in 10 years.

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

It's not clutter if it has good uses

it really doesn't.

If you add ponify to the dictionaries, you might as well add this


Lumberjack

Euphemism for someone who drops a huge, usually long, piece of shit. As a lumberjack lays logs, this person laid their to the toilet.

Aww dude, couldn't you flush the toilet?

I did, but the log was too long go down.

You lumberjack!

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

Not to mention it'll be completely gone in 10 years.

because the english language is always evolving
I didn't think people would be so offended by the idea of a new word but then again it really shouldn't surprise me

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

If you add ponify to the dictionaries, you might as well add this

does that get used in that manner often enough to be considered a part of the english language? Then sure of course

This is something the MLP community always had a massive problem with. They feel that just because they personally are obsessed with the show, that naturally everyone else will feel the same way.

I.e. "ponify being a word just shows that MLP is gonna take over the world! xD" when in reality it's just a small group of people who are fans of some random toy-based TV show. Pokédex isn't a dictionary word either, and for good reason. Just because some community uses it, that certainly doesn't mean they're "advancing the English language", or having the language "evolve".

Bronies always forced their fandom onto others for no good reason- I think it's because the community has lots of socially inept people who don't actually understand that other people simply aren't interested in what they're obsessed with.

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

If you add ponify to the dictionaries, you might as well add this

does that get used in that manner often enough to be considered a part of the english language? Then sure of course

No it doesn't and neither does ponify -> my point. Both belong in the category "slang", words that are used by only a very small subset of people, words you won't find in any respectable piece of literature etc.

Not fit for dictionaries.

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

"ponify being a word just shows that MLP is gonna take over the world! xD" when in reality it's just a small group of people who are fans of some random toy-based TV show.

nice strawman

"Ponify" extends beyond the fandom just because of how the word is used, whereas pokedex literally isn't because it's a plot device that is fundamentally tied to the pokemon world. You're not going to use a "pokedex" to identify a real animal or a digimon or something, hence it's not really something that'd land in a dictionary.

If you see something that's been turned into a pony, though, it's been ponified. It's like you're referring to an art-style - people refer to picasso-style paintings as such, because it fundamentally conveys the intended meaning as clearly as possible, because everyone knows who picasso is and how unique his style was. In the same way, anyone and everyone can identify the meaning of "ponification", hence...well, it's a word!

as for obsession I say you'd be the one who's obsessed what with getting so assblasted over the whole thing. I didn't expect anything like this sort of reaction

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

No it doesn't and neither does ponify -> my point. Both belong in the category "slang", words that are used by only a very small subset of people, words you won't find in any respectable piece of literature etc.

It's used outside of the fandom, though. Even if you're not a brony you know what the hell it means to "ponify" something

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

"ponify being a word just shows that MLP is gonna take over the world! xD" when in reality it's just a small group of people who are fans of some random toy-based TV show.

nice strawman

https://www.equestriadaily.com/2017/07/ ... rriam.html

"Pony has entered the dictionary, guys, as 'ponify' enters into the English language through Merriam-Webster! We're slowly taking over the whole world, aren't we?"


Also: Do you think that "JoJofied" should be part of the dictionary? Spongebobified? Furrified? Chibified? etc etc

Your worldview's deluded if you think the word "ponify" has any relevance outside of the MLP community

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

"Ponify" extends beyond the fandom

lol

prove it

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

Your worldview's deluded if you think the word "ponify" has any relevance outside of the MLP community

.

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

It's used outside of the fandom, though. Even if you're not a brony you know what the hell it means to "ponify" something

I actually had no idea what it means

Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

"Ponify" extends beyond the fandom

lol

prove it

ponify

see i used it and im not part of the fandom

FuZ is now a brony

checkmate atheists

i want to fuck a horse now

v

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

I actually had no idea what it means

well now you do congrats

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

"Pony has entered the dictionary, guys, as 'ponify' enters into the English language through Merriam-Webster! We're slowly taking over the whole world, aren't we?"

That's been a meme since the fandom's inception and you're totally clueless about the fandom if you think it's actually serious

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

Also: Do you think that "JoJofied" should be part of the dictionary? Spongebobified? Furrified? Chibified? etc etc

If it gets use, yes! That's what language is.

no Mahogany that is not what dictionaries are for. If it worked that way, everyone could just make up a word and say "but d'uh I use the word so its part of our language, now put it in the dictionary"

just no

slang generally doesn't go in dictionaries. Different for jargon, but slang is just nope 99% of the time.

You do understand that every single word we are using right now was made up by someone in the past, right?