Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

lostsilver wrote: q37e

i really dont wanna necro ot's royal museum of art three months later, but where are the other ot collabs?
why hasn't that thread been as active as it was?

i'm just asking, you don't have to answer if you don't want to

abraker handles that thread, they probably have just missed it and not added it

ah okay
thank you for the info!

also, feel free to bump the museum, if you post the missing images on the thread, they will most likely than not get added

ahhh oki oki
thank you, ill do it now! (i think it was just the collab corne hosted that needed added so yeah)

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I read somewhere that it's 3 months for regular threads. For OT threads, it feels like a week old thread could be outdated enough to fit that category.

i'd rather stick to 1 month of inactivity because threads get darkened after that amount of time. this change has made its way back to the current design (forgot to mention that in my previous post)

Serraionga wrote: 2r3s1z

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I read somewhere that it's 3 months for regular threads. For OT threads, it feels like a week old thread could be outdated enough to fit that category.

i'd rather stick to 1 month of inactivity because threads get darkened after that amount of time. this change has made its way back to the current design (forgot to mention that in my previous post)

Oh yeah. In theory anything past 1 month is a necro then, but in practice I do believe that 3 months is still alright, nobody is going to scream "necro!" for a 2 or 3 month old thread, I imagine. Anything past that, maybe?

B0ii wrote: 33m13

Farfocele wrote: e575n

Serraionga wrote: 2r3s1z

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Necro: To necro means to revive a dead thread. This means, posting in a thread that hasn't received activity for a long time, normally around 6 months, bumping it to the front page. Necroposting is seen as something negative, and there is warning in some threads warning you not to do it.

community/forums/posts/8546219

i get the feeling an edit war would have started by now if anyone could edit

yep

Like the article with caesar salad, but instead of the country changing, it would be the duration for a necro

not gonna lie, after having been absent from ot for about 12-18 months, this is strangely interesting to read from. i love any kind of encyclopedia, and this (mainly the important threads section) looks like an ok start

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

not gonna lie, after having been absent from ot for about 12-18 months, this is strangely interesting to read from. i love any kind of encyclopedia, and this (mainly the important threads section) looks like an ok start

Yeah the previous threads for that were outdated and an update was long overdue.
The Art of OT was already starting to get outdated when I first ed OT over 2 years ago.

OT wiki when

Farfocele wrote: e575n

OT wiki when

i was actually thinking about making an OT wiki but then i was like "nah we already have the encyclopedia"

i still have my meraheze so if any the mods over there feel kind enough to accept the idea of an OT wiki and majority of us want an OT wiki well..

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

Farfocele wrote: e575n

OT wiki when

i was actually thinking about making an OT wiki but then i was like "nah we already have the encyclopedia"

i still have my meraheze so if any the mods over there feel kind enough to accept the idea of an OT wiki and majority of us want an OT wiki well..

i would want to be a contributor!

A wiki would work well if you pull it off; that is make it work like an actual wiki. It doesn't have to be like the Encyclopedia at all.

I suggest making it using Wikia or something, unless you find a way to format it well here.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I suggest making it using Wikia or something, unless you find a way to format it well here.

no, fuck fandom. there are far better wiki services out there, like the previously mentioned miraheze. i might use fandom as a last resort though.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

A wiki would work well if you pull it off; that is make it work like an actual wiki. It doesn't have to be like the Encyclopedia at all.

I suggest making it using Wikia or something, unless you find a way to format it well here.

fuck fandom honestly

I have no idea what fandom did but I imagine your reaction is justified.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I have no idea what fandom did but I imagine your reaction is justified.

basically they're hella greedy

If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.

You can submit pull requests on the ppy/osu-wiki GitHub. Just make sure to check wiki/osu!_wiki/Contribution_guide first

- Marco - wrote: 6a4s1t

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.

You can submit pull requests on the ppy/osu-wiki GitHub. Just make sure to check wiki/osu!_wiki/Contribution_guide first

i ain't bothering with that

Farfocele wrote: e575n

- Marco - wrote: 6a4s1t

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.

You can submit pull requests on the ppy/osu-wiki GitHub. Just make sure to check wiki/osu!_wiki/Contribution_guide first

i ain't bothering with that

Farfocele wrote: e575n

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

Farfocele wrote: e575n

OT wiki when

i was actually thinking about making an OT wiki but then i was like "nah we already have the encyclopedia"

i still have my meraheze so if any the mods over there feel kind enough to accept the idea of an OT wiki and majority of us want an OT wiki well..

i would want to be a contributor!

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Farfocele wrote: e575n

- Marco - wrote: 6a4s1t

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.

You can submit pull requests on the ppy/osu-wiki GitHub. Just make sure to check wiki/osu!_wiki/Contribution_guide first

i ain't bothering with that

Farfocele wrote: e575n

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

Farfocele wrote: e575n

OT wiki when

i was actually thinking about making an OT wiki but then i was like "nah we already have the encyclopedia"

i still have my meraheze so if any the mods over there feel kind enough to accept the idea of an OT wiki and majority of us want an OT wiki well..

i would want to be a contributor!

lol lmao lmfao <3 love this from y'all

B0ii wrote: 33m13

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I have no idea what fandom did but I imagine your reaction is justified.

basically they're hella greedy

use antifandom to put on a protective suit

welp just sent a wiki request to miraheze lets hope they accept it

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

welp just sent a wiki request to miraheze lets hope they accept it

Would be funny if they say "you already have an ingame wiki you can edit though?".

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

welp just sent a wiki request to miraheze lets hope they accept it

Would be funny if they say "you already have an ingame wiki you can edit though?".

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

welp just sent a wiki request to miraheze lets hope they accept it

Would be funny if they say "you already have an ingame wiki you can edit though?".

uhh gng help me out here, i did submit a request and by the looks of it the wiki is getting accepted, i just need a better paragraph so uhhh get cooking please and try to sound some what pro thx

son of a-

OT: Will there be any rules against editing your own page, provided you are notable enough for one?

probably not? i don't see why editing your own page would be a bad thing

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

probably not? i don't see why editing your own page would be a bad thing

Ah, nice. On Wikipedia, directly editing your own entry could actually result in sanctions from violating Conflict of Interest rules, lol.

I don't think OT s should have their own page.
That is, if you plan on genuinely continuing this project.

My only reason being that half of us haven't done anything worthy of documentation. Maybe an Abraker page or a JohnMedina page would be alright. Keep the standards high.
I could also contribute to writing anything if you have some open spaces.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I don't think OT s should have their own page.

too bad i alreay bought 10000 domains

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I don't think OT s should have their own page.
That is, if you plan on genuinely continuing this project.

My only reason being that half of us haven't done anything worthy of documentation. Maybe an Abraker page or a JohnMedina page would be alright.

Yeah, I wouldn't say I am notable either lol.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I don't think OT s should have their own page.

i'm actually kind of curious how bad it could get, if it were to be problem

among my curiosities is whether peoples' pages end up reflecting the tone/texture/character of the s themselves, as well as whether there's a general forum-wide bias from likability or if it'll really remain neutral after all

so maybe a mixture of logistics issues and the status likely held by having a particular kind of wiki page in depth or length or tone. makes the forum somewhat incentivized toward something awfully competitive, through some form of ego-stroking self-obsession (a slightly hyperbolic generalization, but probably somewhere near there)

i kind of don't care either way yet, but i'm sure i would at least find a reason to start caring in practice depending on how it ultimately affects ot

...

didn't refresh in time to see the edit, i had an entirely different rationale i guess lmao

Farfocele wrote: e575n

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

probably not? i don't see why editing your own page would be a bad thing

Ah, nice. On Wikipedia, directly editing your own entry could actually result in sanctions from violating Conflict of Interest rules, lol.

If that was enforced there would be no Wikipedia page about Wikipedia, especially not one that's basically saying it's the best wiki ever and the only one you should ever use (it may have changed but it used to be like that kinda).
If someone change their own page (or any page) to write shit it can be reverted I guess.
Don't know if miraheze allows locking pages like Wikipedia does.

Ymir wrote: 2z2l6t

I don't think OT s should have their own page.
That is, if you plan on genuinely continuing this project.

My only reason being that half of us haven't done anything worthy of documentation. Maybe an Abraker page or a JohnMedina page would be alright. Keep the standards high.
I could also contribute to writing anything if you have some open spaces.

Some definitely deserve one, others not. I guess there should only be pages for people who have done something significant or stayed long enough to have left a trace. Although that can be hard to decide for some (especially the old ones few ) it shouldn't be too hard for people who have been here in the last 3-4 years since there are still active people from then.
Either that or everyone who's posted somewhat significantly (denizens?) gets one but most would be nearly empty.

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

among my curiosities is whether peoples' pages end up reflecting the tone/texture/character of the s themselves, as well as whether there's a general forum-wide bias from likability or if it'll really remain neutral after all

Time to make a guestbook like in the old times where s give their opinion on each other through their wiki page .

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

welp just sent a wiki request to miraheze lets hope they accept it

Would be funny if they say "you already have an ingame wiki you can edit though?".

uhh gng help me out here, i did submit a request and by the looks of it the wiki is getting accepted, i just need a better paragraph so uhhh get cooking please and try to sound some what pro thx

what the-

anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself

https://chatgpt.com

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself

https://chatgpt.com

Don't.

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself

even trying to form a prompt for it would be a difficult task depending on what you're going to include in it. without any idea of the specific components and formatting and general documentation philosophy, i can't really imagine what "the OT wiki" is either, much less what an accurately descriptive paragraph would look like

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself

https://chatgpt.com

Don't.

dont use chatgpt, samet
dont give in

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself

https://chatgpt.com

Don't.

dont use chatgpt, samet
dont give in

Don't know why I read this like "Never Give Up".

- Marco - wrote: 6a4s1t

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.

You can submit pull requests on the ppy/osu-wiki GitHub. Just make sure to check wiki/osu!_wiki/Contribution_guide first

when is - Marco - becoming a GMT

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself

https://chatgpt.com

Don't.

dont use chatgpt, samet
dont give in

I'm sure ChatGPT wouldn't be able to make an OT! wiki even decent

Corne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself

https://chatgpt.com

Don't.

dont use chatgpt, samet
dont give in

I'm sure ChatGPT wouldn't be able to make an OT! wiki even decent

yeah the point is that it must be ass and chatgpt isn't the best for that

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Corne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p

lostsilver wrote: q37e

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Reyalp51 wrote: 3o2r5d

sametdze wrote: 1l1a4s

anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself

https://chatgpt.com

Don't.

dont use chatgpt, samet
dont give in

I'm sure ChatGPT wouldn't be able to make an OT! wiki even decent

yeah the point is that it must be ass and chatgpt isn't the best for that

In addition, on the actual Wikipedia, ChatGPT is very not recommended.

people really used ChatGPT because they are lazy, what a shame

chatgpt is a language learning model, not a knowledge model, and especially not a niche knowledge model

it would fuck up to a comedic degree

You need to add dweller to the vocabulary

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

You need to add dweller to the vocabulary

It's barely used anymore, people still use overlord despite it being obsolete though.

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

You need to add dweller to the vocabulary

It's barely used anymore, people still use overlord despite it being obsolete though.

fact checked that and it turns it hasn't been really ever used, at all

like really, that word has only been used 350 times in total, and only 250 or so with the modern meaning

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

You need to add dweller to the vocabulary

It's barely used anymore, people still use overlord despite it being obsolete though.

fact checked that and it turns it hasn't been really ever used, at all

like really, that word has only been used 350 times in total, and only 250 or so with the modern meaning

and besides, a dweller isn't something exclusive to the community of ot

Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?

you could make it as an article i guess

Farfocele wrote: e575n

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?

you could make it as an article i guess

Wdym by article? Like a news article?

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Farfocele wrote: e575n

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?

you could make it as an article i guess

Wdym by article? Like a news article?

Like a wikipedia article, but in the OT encyclopedia instead. I think it may be warranted.

Unless you meant the other way around and throwing this into the iceberg, which you should also do.

Farfocele wrote: e575n

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Farfocele wrote: e575n

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?

you could make it as an article i guess

Wdym by article? Like a news article?

Like a wikipedia article, but in the OT encyclopedia instead. I think it may be warranted.

Unless you meant the other way around and throwing this into the iceberg, which you should also do.

actually a good idea lol but i just thought about the other way around lel

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?

isn't it outdated?

Corne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?

isn't it outdated?

oh yeah i also need to upsdatre it lol 😅

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Corne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p

Aireunaeus wrote: 2w2b1a

Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?

isn't it outdated?

oh yeah i also need to upsdatre it lol 😅

Any updates?

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

You need to add dweller to the vocabulary

It's barely used anymore, people still use overlord despite it being obsolete though.

let it be known that i recognize all dwellers, the unacknowledged non-denizen nomads and lurkers who contribute to our hit and run entertainment economy :) lets consolidate the dwellers and denizens of ths place and help invade gd again while we're here too...

long live the undead~

...

its not a necessary addition i suppose, but its funny so like, why not :>

i do wonder if the encyclopedia could use extra organization and curation