You can just tag the postNotRaffi wrote: 171b11
Mainly the abraker soft accuse and the "i don't have an opinion" (not the exact word i forgot what you said)
Oh I glossed this over until sam quoted it. Yea this pretty much maes Cleve and Igor both scum not likely. I am going to interpolate from past games as a good enough reason to vote igor this game based on his behavior.ClevelandsMyBro wrote: 58np
do it. but if i turned out to be town then give igor a thorough look tomorrow. unlike shin, you're not gonna lose anything for voting me out.
Julian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
The suggestion proposed by Sam seems best acceptable as of now.
I don't think Cleveland and Igor would be scum partners according to I've read to what Cleveland has mentioned, since he also suggests against Igor.
So if Igor does indeed turn out scum, Cleveland is what he claims.
Unless there's some sort of wits involved in this proposal which seems unlikely.
Just curious why their are star in the end in some namesDCT wrote: 4w3f2c
Evan-Amos, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
My Discord server: https://discord.gg/xfR86Vghcc
RulesThis game uses the NewD3 setup. Mechanics pertaining to this rule apply for this run. Here is the remaining of the rules:
Amianki wrote: 4f234j
General
1.1) All site rules apply. Be familiar with them before playing.
1.2) Unless your role PM says otherwise, you are not allowed to talk about the game outside of the thread.
1.3) Quoting any PM from the will result in a modkill. Paraphrasing is usually acceptable.
1.4) You are not alllowed to talk about on-going mafia games under any circumstances.
1.5) This is a game and strong language/tones are possible. As long as it remains civil, it is acceptable. Personal grudges or harassment (sexist, homophobic, racist, etc.) is not acceptable. The first offense will result in a warning, while the second will result in a force replace.
Game Mechanics
2.1) All votes must be bolded. Votes without this format will be ignored.
[b]Vote: Player[/b]2.2) Votes within quote or spoiler tags will be ignored.
2.3) It is recommended to use a player's full name for votes, but it is acceptable to shorten it as long as it doesn't cause confusion. Any ambiguous votes will be ignored.
2.4) Unvoting is recommended for changing your vote, but not required. The exceptions are when you aren't placing another vote or if you have a multiple voting ability.
2.5) A lynch will be achieved when 50%+1 of the player list has their vote on a single person. Once that threshold is reached, the game enters twilight and no more votes will count for the day. No lynch votes require only 50% of the player list to go through.
2.6) During twilight players and the lynchee are still allowed to talk, but as stated in 2.5 there will be no more votes. Twilight ends as soon as the mod posts the lynch scene.
2.7) You are allowed a single post in the thread once you are dead. (Namely, a "Bah!" post) This post must not contain any game-relevant information.
2.8) If deadline is reached without anyone ever hitting the lynch threshold, then a lynch will only occur if someone is at one vote below the lynch threshold. If multiple, then the first one to hit it will be lynched. Anything else below that will lead to No Lynch.
2.9) If you have a night action, it can be changed as many times as you want as long its still within the deadline the mod has given. Anything after that will have no effect.
Activity and Deadlines
3.1) Do your best to stay active. This game is a commitment.
3.2) If you do not post in the thread for 24 hours, you are eligable for a prod PM. Players may request a prod if another player hasn't posted in that time.
3.3) If a player has to be prodded 3 times in a day, or 4 times total across the game, they may be force-replaced.
3.4) Players have 24 hours after recieving a prod to open the PM. After this threshold has ed, I will begin looking for a replacement.
3.5) If you will be gone for an extended period of time, you may post your V/LA in bold. The Prod Timer will be ignored for the duration and will be reset once it is over. V/LAs should not be longer than half of a day phase if you will have no access.
3.6) If you have to be gone for a significant amount of time, you will most likely be replaced. Finding your own replacement is appreciated, but not strictly required.
3.7) Deadlines will be days equal to the amount of players left alive, with a minimum of five days.
3.8) Nights will have a 36 hour deadline, plus about 2 hours depending on where it ends to allow the mod to resolve actions correctly. Failure to submit an action will result in you doing nothing for the night.
3.9) Deadlines for both day and night may be extended depending on the circumstances. While night deadlines will only be extended due to replacement issues, day deadlines are more flexible. Replacements are most likely to be the cause of a day's deadline extending, but aren't necessarily the only possible cause.
Miscellaneous
4.1) Use the “topic starter” badge to identify me.
4.2) I will do my best to post vote counts at least once a day. Depending on the activity level, I will post vote counts either more or less often. If you request a vote count, I will provide one at the next opportunity.
4.3) Do not post cryptography, codes, invisible text, or small text.
4.4) Editing your post is grounds for an immediate modkill. Don't do it. PLEASE DON'T DO IT.
4.5) All story flavor is completely game-irrelevant.
4.7) If a vote count is incorrect, let me know and I'll correct it when I have time.
4.8) Feel free to PM me if something in the game or ruleset is unclear.
4.9) Loopholes do not exist. Use common sense. If something sounds like it would be against the rules and isn't listed here, chances are you will still be punished for it. See rule 4.8 if you're unsure.
4.10) I reserve the right to modify the ruleset as needed. If this happens, you will be notified in thread.Alive 6o4q40
Prods are denoted by asterisk (*).
- abraker
- samX500
- manishmathur*
- ghoulybits
- ClevelandsMyBro*
- NotRaffi*
- Julian_Kaiser
Dead 2r3l6w
- ShinRun, Town Doctor, killed Night 1
- igorsprite, Mafia Goon, eliminated Day 2
idk, I just kinda think that manish is pretty suspicious, also how am I supposed to know that they were scum before the night lmaosamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
@Julian_kaiser
@NotRaffi
You two did not vote for igorsprite, who is a confirmed scum.
Did you perhaps note vote for them because they were your scum buddy?
everyone was done parking their votes and the only vote slot was the hammering,samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
@Julian_kaiser
@NotRaffi
You two did not vote for igorsprite, who is a confirmed scum.
Did you perhaps note vote for them because they were your scum buddy?
2 and 3 most likely so I am willing to believe one of those two over the others.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
1. Our PR got roleblocked.
2. Our PR found that ClevelandsMyBro is town and don't want to reveal themselves.
3. Our PR didn't target ClevelandsMyBro.
4. Our PR is The_indian_guy and can't report their investigation because they are being forced replaced.
Can you elaborate what you meant by this?ClevelandsMyBro wrote: 58np
somethings fishy
I recall unvoting, not that it really matters now.DCT wrote: 4w3f2c
Evan-Amos, Public domain, from Wikimedia Commons[/centre]
Final results 2u4su
igorsprite: (E) samX500, abraker, ghoulybits, The Indian Guy, ClevelandsMyBro
ClevelandsMyBro: (1) Julian_Kaiser
The Indian Guy: (1) NotRaffi
No elimination: (0)
lol ok, only person I found sus the entire game is just the one i voted on last day, I'm not active often because of reasons but everyday i tried to read everything to catch up and yeah, that's itJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
You could tell us if you find anyone more suspicious/reasonable to vote out other than yourself.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
Like, I have no way of defending myself except for just saying no right?
And why we should vote them out.
remind us again who you voted on the last day...NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
lol ok, only person I found sus the entire game is just the one i voted on last day, I'm not active often because of reasons but everyday i tried to read everything to catch up and yeah, that's itJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
You could tell us if you find anyone more suspicious/reasonable to vote out other than yourself.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
Like, I have no way of defending myself except for just saying no right?
And why we should vote them out.
It's manish, I didn't think I changed itabraker wrote: 6cx2d
remind us again who you voted on the last day...NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
lol ok, only person I found sus the entire game is just the one i voted on last day, I'm not active often because of reasons but everyday i tried to read everything to catch up and yeah, that's itJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
You could tell us if you find anyone more suspicious/reasonable to vote out other than yourself.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
Like, I have no way of defending myself except for just saying no right?
And why we should vote them out.
why manish?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
It's manish, I didn't think I changed itabraker wrote: 6cx2d
remind us again who you voted on the last day...NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
lol ok, only person I found sus the entire game is just the one i voted on last day, I'm not active often because of reasons but everyday i tried to read everything to catch up and yeah, that's itJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
You could tell us if you find anyone more suspicious/reasonable to vote out other than yourself.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
Like, I have no way of defending myself except for just saying no right?
And why we should vote them out.
It's only because of the one accuse he didabraker wrote: 6cx2d
why manish?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
It's manish, I didn't think I changed itabraker wrote: 6cx2d
remind us again who you voted on the last day...NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
lol ok, only person I found sus the entire game is just the one i voted on last day, I'm not active often because of reasons but everyday i tried to read everything to catch up and yeah, that's itJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
You could tell us if you find anyone more suspicious/reasonable to vote out other than yourself.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
Like, I have no way of defending myself except for just saying no right?
And why we should vote them out.
You chose to vote him because he does not decide his own opinion for votes, is that correct?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
It's manish, I didn't think I changed itabraker wrote: 6cx2d
remind us again who you voted on the last day...NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
lol ok, only person I found sus the entire game is just the one i voted on last day, I'm not active often because of reasons but everyday i tried to read everything to catch up and yeah, that's itJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
You could tell us if you find anyone more suspicious/reasonable to vote out other than yourself.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
Like, I have no way of defending myself except for just saying no right?
And why we should vote them out.
1. yeaJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
You chose to vote him because he does not decide his own opinion for votes, is that correct?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
It's manish, I didn't think I changed itabraker wrote: 6cx2d
remind us again who you voted on the last day...NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
lol ok, only person I found sus the entire game is just the one i voted on last day, I'm not active often because of reasons but everyday i tried to read everything to catch up and yeah, that's itJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
You could tell us if you find anyone more suspicious/reasonable to vote out other than yourself.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
Like, I have no way of defending myself except for just saying no right?
And why we should vote them out.
And to the best of my knowledge, all that he has ever done so far was to participate in votes that have been pre-selected.
Well, that does not seem to be enough to convince why I should consider voting someone else. And neither do I wish to be late on voting this one out.
Vote: NotRaffi
which is?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
It's only because of the one accuse he didabraker wrote: 6cx2d
why manish?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
It's manish, I didn't think I changed itabraker wrote: 6cx2d
remind us again who you voted on the last day...NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
lol ok, only person I found sus the entire game is just the one i voted on last day, I'm not active often because of reasons but everyday i tried to read everything to catch up and yeah, that's itJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
You could tell us if you find anyone more suspicious/reasonable to vote out other than yourself.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
Like, I have no way of defending myself except for just saying no right?
And why we should vote them out.
I am betting on the fact that our cop/tracker investigated them last night, if that is true, the fact that they haven't come out against Cleveland despite there being only one scum left shows that Cleveland is town.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
Why do you think it's not cleveland?
Would you say it's a calculated kind of bet or gambling kind of bet?samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
I am betting on the fact that our cop/tracker investigated them last night, if that is true, the fact that they haven't come out against Cleveland despite there being only one scum left shows that Cleveland is town.
I wouldn't be so sure. Could have done that on purpose to appear as town.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
Also, Cleveland talked and voted against Igorsprite on day 2. If Cleveland is scum, I don't know why they would go that far to throw their scumbuddy under the bus.
Could be it, since he attempted to vote out shin on d1 then was most confirmed on convincing us to vote out igor.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
I wouldn't be so sure. Could have done that on purpose to appear as town.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
Also, Cleveland talked and voted against Igorsprite on day 2. If Cleveland is scum, I don't know why they would go that far to throw their scumbuddy under the bus.
I think my town read on Cleveland is fine for now. The fact that they didn't vote out NotRaffi when they were at E-1 reinforces my read.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
Would you say it's a calculated kind of bet or gambling kind of bet?samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
I am betting on the fact that our cop/tracker investigated them last night, if that is true, the fact that they haven't come out against Cleveland despite there being only one scum left shows that Cleveland is town.
I wouldn't be so sure. Could have done that on purpose to appear as town.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
Also, Cleveland talked and voted against Igorsprite on day 2. If Cleveland is scum, I don't know why they would go that far to throw their scumbuddy under the bus.
well since I did not get the answer I was expecting, let me challenge thatsamX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
I think my town read on Cleveland is fine for now. The fact that they didn't vote out NotRaffi when they were at E-1 reinforces my read.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
Would you say it's a calculated kind of bet or gambling kind of bet?samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
I am betting on the fact that our cop/tracker investigated them last night, if that is true, the fact that they haven't come out against Cleveland despite there being only one scum left shows that Cleveland is town.
I wouldn't be so sure. Could have done that on purpose to appear as town.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
Also, Cleveland talked and voted against Igorsprite on day 2. If Cleveland is scum, I don't know why they would go that far to throw their scumbuddy under the bus.
Let's think about this. Let's assume Cleveland is town. Why would scum say it's better to vote for them than town? How does that make sense?igorsprite wrote: 6x186x
just cast the hammer, i'm not paying much attention to the game, so i think that i'm a better option to vote than clevelandsJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
Unvote
I'm not sure about casting the hammer yet, let him have his last words or something.
Under the assumption that NotRaffi is town:samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
I think my town read on Cleveland is fine for now. The fact that they didn't vote out NotRaffi when they were at E-1 reinforces my read.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
Would you say it's a calculated kind of bet or gambling kind of bet?samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
I am betting on the fact that our cop/tracker investigated them last night, if that is true, the fact that they haven't come out against Cleveland despite there being only one scum left shows that Cleveland is town.
I wouldn't be so sure. Could have done that on purpose to appear as town.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
Also, Cleveland talked and voted against Igorsprite on day 2. If Cleveland is scum, I don't know why they would go that far to throw their scumbuddy under the bus.
That's a good observation but I am also going to point out the fact that I am the one who flipped to vote from Cleveland to Igor. At the beginning of the day the rest of town was voting for Cleveland until I proposed the plan of voting Igor first and then inspecting Cleveland. Igor didn't decide to sacrifice themselves, I pushed for them to be eliminated and they didn't fight back.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
So we have this:
Let's think about this. Let's assume Cleveland is town. Why would scum say it's better to vote for them than town? How does that make sense?igorsprite wrote: 6x186x
just cast the hammer, i'm not paying much attention to the game, so i think that i'm a better option to vote than clevelandsJulian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
Unvote
I'm not sure about casting the hammer yet, let him have his last words or something.
No, what does make sense is that Igor sacrificed themselves to make cleveland appear as town, because
1. Igor doesn't really want to be in the game anymore
2. Their team is more likely to win this way
I am going to trust your trusting of PR townie to have investigated Cleveland. The order in which they are lynched shouldn't really matter at the end.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
That's a good observation but I am also going to point out the fact that I am the one who flipped to vote from Cleveland to Igor. At the beginning of the day the rest of town was voting for Cleveland until I proposed the plan of voting Igor first and then inspecting Cleveland. Igor didn't decide to sacrifice themselves, I pushed for them to be eliminated and they didn't fight back.
I am also very confident in the fact that Cleveland was inspected last night because town followed me in voting Igor, and if Cleveland was inspected and no one came out against them, it means they were town.
Modkills would not be used unless strictly necessary.Julian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
@DCT, is there any chance Manish's slot would get modkilled if no one chooses to replace him.
at D-2 we all decided to vote igor out and let another PR perform their action on me. now we are here and that same PR has not responded yet and everyone else had grown suspicous of me.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
but why cleveland anyways? like what did he do, Also Yall know I'm bad at scum hunting smh
well then it's the pr's fault tfClevelandsMyBro wrote: 58np
at D-2 we all decided to vote igor out and let another PR perform their action on me. now we are here and that same PR has not responded yet and everyone else had grown suspicous of me.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
but why cleveland anyways? like what did he do, Also Yall know I'm bad at scum hunting smh
+ all the other "scummy" things i did during the entirety of this game.
no not really. i suggest you read this firstNotRaffi wrote: 171b11
well then it's the pr's fault tfClevelandsMyBro wrote: 58np
at D-2 we all decided to vote igor out and let another PR perform their action on me. now we are here and that same PR has not responded yet and everyone else had grown suspicous of me.NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
but why cleveland anyways? like what did he do, Also Yall know I'm bad at scum hunting smh
+ all the other "scummy" things i did during the entirety of this game.
Why not?NotRaffi wrote: 171b11
but why cleveland anyways? like what did he do, Also Yall know I'm bad at scum hunting smh
Can you elaborate on why you think NotRaffi isn't scum?Julian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
Vote: ClevelandsMyBro
I got the feeling NotRaffi isn't really scum because he would have given some more insight to whatever pertains to the game.
And maybe he would have taken things more serious.
If NotRaffi isn't scum, then my suspicion holds on Cleve.
Can you also elaborate what you think happened with the investigating?Julian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
Vote: ClevelandsMyBro
I got the feeling NotRaffi isn't really scum because he would have given some more insight to whatever pertains to the game.
And maybe he would have taken things more serious.
If NotRaffi isn't scum, then my suspicion holds on Cleve.
He seems unsure of his opinions, isn't really determined in voting either and my hunch is telling me that he's more likely town, and Cleve has done more suspicious activity.samX500 wrote: 4e1z5d
Can you elaborate on why you think NotRaffi isn't scum?Julian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
Vote: ClevelandsMyBro
I got the feeling NotRaffi isn't really scum because he would have given some more insight to whatever pertains to the game.
And maybe he would have taken things more serious.
If NotRaffi isn't scum, then my suspicion holds on Cleve.
I'm guessing either PR got blocked or PR is Manish and can't say anything about his investigation.abraker wrote: 6cx2d
Can you also elaborate what you think happened with the investigating?Julian_Kaiser wrote: c5t1q
Vote: ClevelandsMyBro
I got the feeling NotRaffi isn't really scum because he would have given some more insight to whatever pertains to the game.
And maybe he would have taken things more serious.
If NotRaffi isn't scum, then my suspicion holds on Cleve.
We are running under the assumption that Cleveland was investigated and found to be town, hence why pr is not saying anything.
2.8) If deadline is reached without anyone ever hitting the lynch threshold, then a lynch will only occur if someone is at one vote below the lynch threshold. If multiple, then the first one to hit it will be lynched. Anything else below that will lead to No Lynch.