Recent attempts of social distancing has pushed me to study the effectiveness methods and compare them to other possible methods.
From the few examples above we can see the relative distance between posters in public spaces.
From all the data in disposal I have determined that:
- Increased distancing effectiveness from 14% up to 29% depending on post content A to B.
- Decreased distancing up to 18% depending on post content A to B.
- Depending on post length this method may be negated due to insufficient content on post A or signature B.
- Images have a larger chance of improving distance as opposed to text.
- Increased distancing effectiveness from 36% up to 67%!
- Depending on content from post A to B or signature A to post B theres around a 20% chance of natural distancing.
TL;DR
From the few examples above we can see the relative distance between posters in public spaces.
From all the data in disposal I have determined that:
1. Social distacing via "padding" produces two scanarios: 4r5f3n
- Increased distancing effectiveness from 14% up to 29% depending on post content A to B.
- Decreased distancing up to 18% depending on post content A to B.
2. Avatars alone have a large chance of not satisfying the requirements for social distancing (negating padding method). 234u2k
3. Having signatures vastly increases the factor of minimal length from post A to B in most scenarios. 4u3i4a
- Depending on post length this method may be negated due to insufficient content on post A or signature B.
- Images have a larger chance of improving distance as opposed to text.
- Increased distancing effectiveness from 36% up to 67%!
4. Taking no precausions isn't completely foolish. 3a533c
- Depending on content from post A to B or signature A to post B theres around a 20% chance of natural distancing.
TL;DR
