I think I need to go into the [lucky:1337]judicial branch[/lucky:1337],
not blister.
It doesn't impact your life,
nor it doesn't need to be this way.
Anyway to not cheer you up,
do something worthy.

- [lucky:1337]Quartz[/lucky:1337]

Blitzfrog wrote: 2a3s

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

i like apache helicopters

Madvillain wrote: 2v6e3b

i like girls

but do you like like girls?

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Tbh there was one good girl on this forum and she left it some time ago.

UnderminE..?

Wojjan..?

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Sargon is definitely not conservative. Just because he doesn't buy into the identity politics, gender nonsense and destructive immigration of the new progressives, doesn't mean he is conservative. He is what a liberal was a decade ago, back when the Left had some semblance of respectability. "Skeptics" like him will go after the lowest hanging fruit of irrationality available, now you progressives kick up a fuss because he's going after your own ideology. It's funny because it's the exact type of people who'd be going after religious conservatives a number of years ago, but as Sargon has pointed out, now it's the Left that is the most destructive fountain of irrationality.

You're accurate with some of this, to be fair. The modern "skeptic community" are the ones who generally got popular criticising crazy religious fundamentalists (usually Christians) a few years back, and since then, they have generally transitioned into becoming rightwing or otherwise conservative politics-based channels. One of the funnier transitions would be Stefan Molyneux, who went from "all politics is bad and I refuse to play that game" to becoming a full-fledged Trump Train er who spouts almost nothing but pro-Trump propaganda and batshit insane relationship theory.

I feel like the Internet has changed in really interesting ways over the years.

Also, I don't feel like the Left had more respectability years ago. Back when SJWs were all across the internet, I can absolutely understand people turning away from the political left in general, seeing the kind of slippery slope BS they seemed to be heading down. That was a few years back, though; it's almost as if people simply haven't caught up to reality yet, still fighting the insane feminists and identity-politics madpeople that no longer exist outside of their own heads, and have ended up siding with the kinds of awful people who have actually gotten real political power and influence (i.e. the Presidency) instead of having their influence rather thankfully contained to places like college campuses.

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Tbh there was one good girl on this forum and she left it some time ago.

UnderminE..?

Wojjan..?

Jazz?

Madvillain wrote: 2v6e3b

sara, you're included

GO AWAY

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Tbh there was one good girl on this forum and she left it some time ago.

UnderminE..?

Wojjan..?

You'd like to know, wouldn't you. :^)

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

Madvillain wrote: 2v6e3b

sara, you're included

GO AWAY

he like likes you

tsun sara

lol wrote: k2335

he like likes you

but does he like like like me?

Meah wrote: f4f5b

It's really embarrassing that some people are into those grossly sexualised little girls

It's called paedophilia and it's completely natural. :^)

People only acts like they are, IRL they're not. But maybe there are some. Like what's the benefit of liking 13 years old below lol.

lol wrote: k2335

he like likes you

oh shit i've been found out

Meah wrote: f4f5b

People only acts like they are, IRL they're not. But maybe there are some. Like what's the benefit of liking 13 years old below lol.

Idk dawg, lots of people in the osu community REALLY FUCKING LOVE loli. It hurts to see

Meah wrote: f4f5b

People only acts like they are, IRL they're not. But maybe there are some.

rohulk

iz gonna b messy

Aurani wrote: k3n52

It's called paedophilia and it's completely natural. :^)

It's a mental illness and most people like that don't want to be this way. Besides, Rohulk knew she was 14 so that's barely pedophilia.

lewd.

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

Aurani wrote: k3n52

It's called paedophilia and it's completely natural. :^)

It's a mental illness and most people like that don't want to be this way. Besides, Rohulk knew she was 14 so that's barely pedophilia.

It's scary how normalized pedophilia is under the guise of "It's anime" or "they're really 500 years old" or whatever
clearly, great people

I am in no way believing that someone who wants to fuck a 12-year old anime girl who clearly looks like 12 doesn't want to fuck one IRL. The common excuses are the ones you listed and quite a few more, including one of my favourites: "They're definitely drawn to look 25!"

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Klocuch12 wrote: 6h432u

It's a mental illness and most people like that don't want to be this way. Besides, Rohulk knew she was 14 so that's barely pedophilia.

Thanks for ing that pic, I only had to 2 thanks to that :]

How the fuck am I supposed to get a joke that's some kind of obscure quote from an imbecile on Twitter? :V

Add multiples of 10 and extras. Count the numbers that you have by hand or in your head, starting from the sets of ten that you have. Oops, in the picture there is a 6 instead of 16; so, that picture has 10 fewer than the number added above and explained below.

In the example from the previous step, you have the 3 extra, after the 50 you already counted up from the paired numbers making 20, plus the other 20 plus 10 and adding 3 extra for a total of 53 (your answer). That was pretty easy to add in your head as: 20 + 20 = 40, and 10 more = 50, so 50 + 3 = 53 (of course you could say "20 is 2 tens", and "20 and 20 is 4 tens", now "plus 10 makes 5 tens which is 50", then "plus 3" is 53).

Aurani wrote: k3n52

How the fuck am I supposed to get a joke that's some kind of obscure quote from an imbecile on Twitter? :V

Tried to make it obvious by saying besides, Rohulk referring to the rohulk drama which mainly took place on twitter and of which epiphany's tweets are a part of

Did anything else happen besides that? What were the responses?

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Did anything else happen besides that? What were the responses?

only my response was relevant


but rly the responses on twitter were memes from mainly polish people, significantly less people backing him up this time. apart from that epiphany guy whos just autistic, some random titty girl aswell but most ppl just ridiculed them

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

It's scary how normalized pedophilia is under the guise of "It's anime" or "they're really 500 years old" or whatever

It's scary how normalized zoophilia is under the guise of "It's cartoon" or whatever

harkness test tho

lol wrote: k2335

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Did anything else happen besides that? What were the responses?

only my response was relevant


but rly the responses on twitter were memes from mainly polish people, significantly less people backing him up this time. apart from that epiphany guy whos just autistic, some random titty girl aswell but most ppl just ridiculed them

I'd say that this time more people backed him up than during the phancakes stuff

To be fair, the person leaking all this is on some kind of weird moral crusade that wants a witch-hunt of some kind. People get fucking weird when they have power over others

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

It's really embarrassing that some people are into those grossly sexualised little girls

Me.

DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47

To be fair, the person leaking all this is on some kind of weird moral crusade that wants a witch-hunt of some kind. People get fucking weird when they have power over others

That's truer than you realise.

Aurani wrote: k3n52

It's called paedophilia and it's completely natural. :^)

No, though it's natural for men to be attracted to 15/16 year olds. IIRC, females are most fertile around that age, and the chances of birth defects rise steadily as she gets older.

Hahahahahahahaha b1rd is defending paedophilia now

I just read Down and Out in Paris and London by George Orwell. I find it hilarious how every Jew is portrayed as some kind of swindler or scam artist, and the book in non-fiction.

Orwell's books are great, short and easy reading, but interesting too. In particular, you get an interesting perceptive of daily life in the early 20th century.

i agree with b1rd, i like 16 year olds as well

i just recently turned 17 though

keyboard warriors lol

Madvillain wrote: 2v6e3b

i agree with b1rd, i like 16 year olds as well

i just recently turned 17 though

God you're so young

Madvillain wrote: 2v6e3b

i agree with b1rd, i like 16 year olds as well

i just recently turned 17 though

he said 'men'

lol wrote: k2335

And you sound like a woman.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

lol wrote: k2335

And you sound like a woman.

better than whatever creature you are, subhuman

lol wrote: k2335

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

And you sound like a woman.

better than whatever creature you are, subhuman

but he already called you that

Called him what?

BrokenArrow wrote: 6i5o49

that

Crystal clear.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

No, though it's natural for men to be attracted to 15/16 year olds. IIRC, females are most fertile around that age, and the chances of birth defects rise steadily as she gets older.

Please tell me you didn't just say that it would be natural for a 50 year old man to be attracted to a 15yo.

I'd also very much like some credible sources that say that a 15 year old has the best possible fertility and least possible defects, because it sounds like pure bullshit. :V

.

Aurani wrote: k3n52

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

No, though it's natural for men to be attracted to 15/16 year olds. IIRC, females are most fertile around that age, and the chances of birth defects rise steadily as she gets older.

Please tell me you didn't just say that it would be natural for a 50 year old man to be attracted to a 15yo.

I'd also very much like some credible sources that say that a 15 year old has the best possible fertility and least possible defects, because it sounds like pure bullshit. :V

even if this was the truth why would you try justifying paedophilia with it, im not just saying this because its edgy but its legit pure autism

Oh shit I didn't know I was ill for preferring older women. Man, if only I knew I didn't have a basic grasp of mammalian sexuality...

lol wrote: k2335

even if this was the truth why would you try justifying paedophilia with it, im not just saying this because its edgy but its legit pure autism

I'm not trying to justify anything, and being attracted to 15 year olds isn't paedophilia. Pedophilia is concerned with pre-pubescent children, and generally 15 and 16 years olds have their reproductive faculties in order. Reproductive capability is pretty much the main determining factor for attractiveness, because obviously reproduction is the main purpose of human sexuality. So yes it is normal for men, even older men, to be attracted to 15 or 16 year old girls who've gone through puberty. And to back up this point, from a layman's perspective, it seems the norm for a lot of cultures and societies for older men to take a younger wife, or multiple younger wife. This being taboo seems to be a relatively recent cultural trend.

And I really don't care that much or have some sort of agenda I'm trying to push, I'm just pointing out some interesting points about human biology and whatnot. Although I would say that paedophilia, while indeed bad, seems to be a boogeyman blown out of all proportion in our current society, and it gets annoying to hear about it all the time, especially concerning harmless 2D images.

Also I accidentally fucked up my last posts by editing it with this one, oh well.

Oh boy, don't start with the age of consent, else Bird might start another discussion with you.

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

Jesus Christ
this is disgusting

Meah wrote: f4f5b

People only acts like they are, IRL they're not. But maybe there are some. Like what's the benefit of liking 13 years old below lol.

13 or below is your limit? that's not any better

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

Meah wrote: f4f5b

People only acts like they are, IRL they're not. But maybe there are some. Like what's the benefit of liking 13 years old below lol.

13 or below is your limit? that's not any better

I prefer 18+

you didn't need to justify yourself? oh well

@B1rd: do you have any sources about fertility comparison between ages?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2431924

"There is no evidence of an overall increase in congenital malformations among babies born to teenagers."

i jack off to 8 year old anime girls mmmmm inbox me if this interests u😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜

lol wrote: k2335

i jack off to 8 year old anime girls mmmmm inbox me if this interests u😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜

even if you don't i will

>literally defending paedophilia

I think people likes to experience fresh undamaged pussies that's why they chose little girls

Meah wrote: f4f5b

fresh undamaged pussies

Something unrelated

I love all of the Fillipino butthurt because their fighter got beat by an Aussie

Pacquiao needs to retire soon, he has done enough for the country already

Prime cro cop > all these pussy fuckboys

Anyone > pussy fuckboys

Get out of my ITT you shitposting twats

I decided to stop shitposting, it aint fun anymore

What Does ITT Mean? Sorry Im New xD

In this thread?

pedophiles get out

let pedophiles in, it's easier for the police this way

Aurani wrote: k3n52

Get out of my ITT you shitposting twats

poor bb y r u mad
let me rub ur butt

Apparently no one understands the meaning of nuance.

Anyway, this video is absolute gold

Hika wrote: 2p2929

poor bb y r u mad
let me rub ur butt

I'm sure your precious Madvillain would not appreciate it.

Mahogany wrote: 4pak

BrokenArrow wrote: 6i5o49

that

no it's not natural

paedophilia is anything but nuanced

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2431924

"There is no evidence of an overall increase in congenital malformations among babies born to teenagers."

yeah but this doesn't even mention older women having higher chances of birth defects either, which is what you claimed. in fact, at one point this study suggested that teenagers have a harder time giving birth due to lower weight and undeveloped body. here, have a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_and_female_fertility

"After puberty, female fertility increases and then decreases, with advanced maternal age causing an increased risk of female infertility."

it also mentions that fertility is at its peak during a woman's 20s because that's when their puberty ends. at one point you said that

So yes it is normal for men, even older men, to be attracted to 15 or 16 year old girls who've gone through puberty.

which is not true at all. some girls don't even start their periods at that age. you've gone through your puberty once you hit your early 20s, but at that age they're actually at their peak of puberty.

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

yeah but this doesn't even mention older women having higher chances of birth defects either, which is what you claimed. in fact, at one point this study suggested that teenagers have a harder time giving birth due to lower weight and undeveloped body. here, have a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_and_female_fertility

"After puberty, female fertility increases and then decreases, with advanced maternal age causing an increased risk of female infertility."

it also mentions that fertility is at its peak during a woman's 20s because that's when their puberty ends. at one point you said that

So yes it is normal for men, even older men, to be attracted to 15 or 16 year old girls who've gone through puberty.

which is not true at all. some girls don't even start their periods at that age. you've gone through your puberty once you hit your early 20s, but at that age they're actually at their peak of puberty.

And yet that claim isn't even backed up by any sources in wikipedia, so it's null and void.

I didn't make any definite statements because I didn't have any evidence, basing the statement on something I read years ago. But it isn't particularly important that teenagers are more fertile than women in their 20s, because it is sufficient to back up my point that they are simply capable of reproduction, which is what the study I linked said. And if you read it carefully, it says that pregnancy only poses a problem for under 15 year olds, and lower birth weights can be attributed to differing socio-economic conditions. It doesn't matter if teenagers haven't finished puberty yet, they have most of their secondary sex characteristics, and are reproductively viable, and these are the things that are important for attractiveness.

The point is, there is nothing abnormal for men to merely be attracted to girls 15+.

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

It doesn't matter if teenagers haven't finished puberty yet, they have most of their secondary sex characteristics, and are reproductively viable, and these are the things that are important for attractiveness.

In your opinion, mate.

Maybe don't confuse your own preferences with whether or not something is normal for grown men in general. I wouldn't want to have anything to do with a fucking 15-year-old

nice

Do you make it a point to be antagonistic about everything? Go vent your self-righteous moral outrage somewhere else.

intravenous custard is anything but a recipe
then you confused it with
a fucking poisonous fish

you can just go into a lake full of
piranhas

with anything
nothing better than cockroaches on a pizza

B1rd wrote: 4w393k

Do you make it a point to be antagonistic about everything? Go vent your self-righteous moral outrage somewhere else.

imagine actually using this as a defense IRL

But it isn't particularly important that teenagers are more fertile than women in their 20s, because it is sufficient to back up my point that they are simply capable of reproduction

thanks for stating the obvious. and also you seemed pretty fixated on fertility so that's why i pointed it out. oh, and by that logic, you'd probably think it's okay for men to go as low as 12 as long as they're capable of reproduction because it seems like nowadays the average age for first period is 12

http://www.obgyn.net/sexual-health/firs ... ical-signs

and you know, that's kind of awful

The point is, there is nothing abnormal for men to merely be attracted to girls 15+.

15 year old girls have such baby faces. they all look like kids. i would be really concerned if someone who's 25 was attracted to such.

[And yet that claim isn't even backed up by any sources in wikipedia, so it's null and void.

do you really need a source on biological clock lol c'mon

Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p

thanks for stating the obvious. and also you seemed pretty fixated on fertility so that's why i pointed it out. oh, and by that logic, you'd probably think it's okay for men to go as low as 12 as long as they're capable of reproduction because it seems like nowadays the average age for first period is 12

http://www.obgyn.net/sexual-health/firs ... ical-signs

and you know, that's kind of awful

The point is, there is nothing abnormal for men to merely be attracted to girls 15+.

15 year old girls have such baby faces. they all look like kids. i would be really concerned if someone who's 25 was attracted to such.

And yet that claim isn't even backed up by any sources in wikipedia, so it's null and void.

do you really need a source on biological clock lol c'mon

The point isn't that they're merely capable of reproducing, but rather they are capable or near as capable as a woman in her early twenties. I'm not really interested unless you want to try and disprove the point I made that there aren't any biological - rather than sociological - reasons as to why it is abnormal for men to be attracted to teens who're well-capable of reproducing. But apparently neither you nor anyone else can separate science from issues of morality and ethics, and you go on to make ridiculous strawmans, like that I think it's okay to have sex with 12 year olds.

What about the power dynamic that inherently exists between two different people who are at completely separate stages of life, B1rd? That's the main argument against incest after all

What the actual fuck has happened sense I've been gone, also if a girl at 15+ looks mature then attraction is normal.

I'm willing to bet my ass that you're younger than 20 so you claim that. Of course a 15yo will be attractive to someone barely out of puberty.

Nice sig Maho

Aurani wrote: k3n52

I'm willing to bet my ass that you're younger than 20 so you claim that. Of course a 15yo will be attractive to someone barely out of puberty.

This, absolutely. Young girls tend to be seen as attractive by other kids, or shut-ins who haven't had much with the opposite sex

Actually, it doesn't stand to reason that men's sexual preferences would drastically change with their age, men don't suddenly become attracted to grannies as they become older, pretty sure most men would get with a younger women if they could. Typically, rich and powerful men have younger wives than normal.

As I've already noted, I haven't been talking about whether it's alright for older men to be in relationships with 15 year olds, just that attraction is normal. So perhaps we can get past these nonsense inferrals that anyone who finds anyone below 20 attractive has something wrong with them. Also, I don't think you understand what incest means.

I haven't been arguing between "alright/normal" either, I just told you that you were projecting your own beliefs. You believe it's a normal thing, but that's an assumption. I think most people wouldn't agree that grown men are generally attracted to girls who haven't even finished puberty; just because they CAN have a baby, that doesn't mean they're entirely developed and sexually attractive to most adults, you understand?

Explain your incest line, since it seems especially thoughtless. Incest is sexual relations between family, nothing more.

To be honest, Daddy, I don't think we'll gain much by trying to discuss that topic here of all places. Osu is chock-full of kids, shut-ins, socially inept individuals as well as anime lovers, so it stands to reason that you'd find this much opposition when it comes to paedophilia and general attraction to younger girls.
As such, it'd be more reasonable to attempt to communicate with a fucking wall than this bunch.