text to speachFuZ wrote: 6f1pt
whomst'd've'lu'yaint'nt'ed'ies's'y'es'nt't're'ing'able'tic'ive'al'nt'ne'm'll'ble'al'ny'less'w'ck'k'ly'py'nd'idy'ety'st'ged'ful'ish'ng'mt'ous
Yeah, I think only one muzzy has driven a truck into a crowd over here.Foxtrot wrote: 2l233p
these guys dont live in europe so their chances of getting hit by a truck are relatively lowAurani wrote: k3n52
I'm sad none of you mongrels have yet been fucking hit by a truck. Wishes sometimes just don't come true, it seems.
Neither of them are any good, but at least Le Pen ed Serbia, unlike that assfag Macron. Macron winning is a tragic loss for , with them being once again spineless shithats.Mahogany wrote: 4pak
Our state's relationship with the church is fucked up
Macron won, beating out Le Pen. Thank you, french people, for being smart about this.
do you actually think le pen winning would be preferableAurani wrote: k3n52
Neither of them are any good, but at least Le Pen ed Serbia, unlike that assfag Macron. Macron winning is a tragic loss for , with them being once against spineless shithats.
so you actually don't care about what happens, you just want an excuse to be a hateful personFuZ wrote: 6f1pt
not like i care that he was elected, it will not affect me since im a neet
just shut up man, you have no idea what he will actually do to the country, people will literally kill themselves at work with the new "work law", he will push new laws like a dictator without referendum, he wants a millitary intervention in Syrie while having borders wide open (hello isis)Mahogany wrote: 4pak
do you actually think le pen winning would be preferableAurani wrote: k3n52
Neither of them are any good, but at least Le Pen ed Serbia, unlike that assfag Macron. Macron winning is a tragic loss for , with them being once against spineless shithats.
seriously now
so you actually don't care about what happens, you just want an excuse to be a hateful personFuZ wrote: 6f1pt
not like i care that he was elected, it will not affect me since im a neet
gotcha![]()
Oh yeah, but he's not le pen.GladiOol wrote: 6o3k6y
But Macron is a capitalist-loving, (((globalist cuck))). He's like the embodiment of what /r/latestagecapitalism should hate.
Then your country should have voted in better politicians, lmaoFuZ wrote: 6f1pt
just shut up man, you have no idea what he will actually do to the country, people will literally kill themselves at work with the new "work law", he will push new laws like a dictator without referendum, he wants a millitary intervention in Syrie while having borders wide open (hello isis)
You're the one convincing yourself it's about racism here pal, I said nothing about itFuZ wrote: 6f1pt
le pen is social, macron is antisocial, as hard as it can be for you negative IQ that only thinks about HURR DURR RACISM, it's the truth
marine le pen is not racist, you have no idea what youre talking aboutMahogany wrote: 4pak
Oh yeah, but he's not le pen.GladiOol wrote: 6o3k6y
But Macron is a capitalist-loving, (((globalist cuck))). He's like the embodiment of what /r/latestagecapitalism should hate.
It might suck, but let's not fool ourselves into thinking it wasn't the best choice between the two.
Then your country should have voted in better politicians, lmaoFuZ wrote: 6f1pt
just shut up man, you have no idea what he will actually do to the country, people will literally kill themselves at work with the new "work law", he will push new laws like a dictator without referendum, he wants a millitary intervention in Syrie while having borders wide open (hello isis)
Between the two, he's by far the better choice
You're the one convincing yourself it's about racism here pal, I said nothing about itFuZ wrote: 6f1pt
le pen is social, macron is antisocial, as hard as it can be for you negative IQ that only thinks about HURR DURR RACISM, it's the truth![]()
i like how you have literally no arguments every times i try to debate with youMahogany wrote: 4pak
That's all you have to say about this?
marine le pen will never get elected because of her family name, people dislike her fatherAurani wrote: k3n52
Le Pen is pretty much what needs right now. It's not something deserves, but it is what needs, unless you're up for turning into an even bigger shithole of kebabs and economically degrading into a third-rate country. May I remind you that has the potential to be the leading European country, yet is currently far behind both AND Britain, with India almost having caught up with it and even BRAZIL threatening to by it. It's only a matter of time before that happens, and reelecting same retards again and again isn't gonna help much.
is doing fine, I'm not quite sure what you're on about. Then again, you've pretty much outright stated you just hate muslims, so I'm not sure what else there is to say.Aurani wrote: k3n52
Le Pen is pretty much what needs right now. It's not something deserves, but it is what needs, unless you're up for turning into an even bigger shithole of kebabs and economically degrading into a third-rate country.
ITT: TearsFuZ wrote: 6f1pt
i like how you have literally no arguments every times i try to debate with you
yes, over 15% people living under poverty line is fine, okMahogany wrote: 4pak
is doing fineAurani wrote: k3n52
Le Pen is pretty much what needs right now. It's not something deserves, but it is what needs, unless you're up for turning into an even bigger shithole of kebabs and economically degrading into a third-rate country.
If people like you stopped existing, there'd be no shit to spread, fam. Stop blaming me when you're the source of the problem.FuZ wrote: 6f1pt
i'm just trying to stop you from spreading shit about my country
You're saying this while ing Le Pen, someone who actively encouraged outside parties to hack her opponentAurani wrote: k3n52
Today's is a stagnant cesspool of rotten and corrupted individuals who need to be removed, as they're driving the country into ruin.
fuck off with those parenthesesGladiOol wrote: 6o3k6y
But Macron is a capitalist-loving, (((globalist cuck))). He's like the embodiment of what /r/latestagecapitalism should hate.
e d g y 👌Mahogany wrote: 4pak
If people like you stopped existing, there'd be no shit to spread, fam. Stop blaming me when you're the source of the problem.FuZ wrote: 6f1pt
i'm just trying to stop you from spreading shit about my country
why i'm worthless i did nothing bad to you.Mahogany wrote: 4pak
NEET, someone who is literally completely worthless to society.
kai99 wrote: 6o576w
mm i cant feel my butt.
I guess my stance on this stuff can be said along the lines of: I'd rather have a corrupt businessman who knows how to do politics instead of a corrupt screeching idiot who appeals to the lowest common denominator.B1rd wrote: 4w393k
Hello Rothschild crony.DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47
Bye bye populist
Le Pen has good immigration policy and she wants to get out of the EU, but she has a bad protectionist economic policy. Macron has better economic policy and free trade, but is a globalist and has a bad immigration policy. I'd rather have someone who doesn't know what they're doing but has good intentions have power over an elite establishment figure who is professional at fucking people over. And leaving the EU, or immigration which will permanently affect a countries demographics will have a lot longer lasting consequences than an import tariff. Such immigration policy will also place the French people at more immediate risk of terrorist attacks and place more strain on the country's welfare and housing.DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47
I guess my stance on this stuff can be said along the lines of: I'd rather have a corrupt businessman who knows how to do politics instead of a corrupt screeching idiot who appeals to the lowest common denominator.
Seriously, I don't understand how people can be in favour of populist politicans unless they ACTUALLY buy into the shit that they're saying (i.e. they're falling for lies). Which a lot of people evidently do, but I have a pretty fucking low opinion of "people in general" nowadays, so their rising (peaked?) popularity doesn't mean anything important to me.
my uncle joe saw anti-overfishing regulations get set in place by law one time so that sort of deflates your argument that you can privately protect the environment (which largely takes place on gov't-owned land)B1rd wrote: 4w393k
I was just at a private conservation ground that gets about 1.6 million dollars of income from private donors from this state alone. Sort of deflates the argument that it's impossible to protect the environment without the government.
Wow did the government really set rules about what you can do on its land? Obviously if that land were privately owned the owners would let anyone come and fish until there was nothing left, because people don't care about their property or its value (only the government does).DaddyCoolVipper wrote: 4p47
my uncle joe saw anti-overfishing regulations get set in place by law one time so that sort of deflates your argument that you can privately protect the environment (which largely takes place on gov't-owned land)