;/ sleep well
Aomi wrote: 2q6w66
Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27
i hope he never comes back![]()
you just say that because you're from a country where half of the male population gets a part of their dick cut away for no reason. Hey, lets do this surgery on newborns that comes with absolutely zero benefits, but will cause them a lot of pain and has an additional risk of causing infection which may result in their death.Khelly wrote: 2m5eq
Foreskin is gross
http://www.academia.edu/6394940/Lost_Bo ... ant_DeathsKhelly wrote: 2m5eq
Phimosis is gross and foreskin makes dicks look nasty and unappealing. You just say that because you're from a country where hardly anyone is circumcised for no reason.
"pain" as an infant that retains no memory isn't a good enough reason. I'd like to see your examples of death from circumcision though.
sure, but would you want to live in a world where you get tortured every night? No sane person would choose that. This is a stupid argument and you know it.Khelly wrote: 2m5eq
I'm actually one who forsn't care about a low number of deaths per year like that. 100 from a surgical procedure? That's it? It'ssuprisingly low.
Im not sure g up for free pain compares, but if all your memories ate wiped then it doesn't actually matter. We could theoretically every night be in excrutisting pain and then forget the whole deal the nect mornung every night for our lives.
it hurts the very moment it happens. Unless you want to argue that causing innocent people needless pain isn't something that should be avoided, your argument is invalid. I find it insane that you're arguing against this.Khelly wrote: 2m5eq
It matters in that case because it persists through day to day in your experiences but in THIS CASE it doesn't last in any meaningful way.
Except other medical procedures generally serve a purpose, unlike getting circumcised. Calculated risk vs. needless risk.Khelly wrote: 2m5eq
Railey2 wrote: 6a2u27
ok let me rephrase it then. You find nothing morally wrong with the death of 100 innocent newborns, just because there's more of them.
Nothing more morally wrong than any other death from medical procedures no
It's a needless medical operation if it serves no medical purpose. This is not an opinion. It is also usually done on infants, so opt-in isn't the current state of things.Khelly wrote: 2m5eq
And ultimately it's up to your opinion on what is or isn't needless
My original statement anyways ways "foreskin" is gross and I hate it and think it looks ugly.
I think circumcision should be opt in just like I think abortion should be freely availible.
If you stop to attack my core-points, I'll assume that you're either too lazy or stupid to do so, or that you simply it how you're wrong. In both cases, it's not worth continuing so why should I answer a "you're right", fake or not fake? It marks the end of the discussion, for one reason or another.Khelly wrote: 2m5eq
Yeah of course you dont respond to an obviously fake "you're right" BUT YOU SHOW UP IMEEDIATELY HERE
HNNNGH
color is probably cumming all over bassist's banned profile right nowEndaris wrote: 6j5f7
after all those yearsMr Color wrote: 1qt6d
also ephemeral did you seriously fucking say permaban and Bassist Vinyl in the same post and not make it a thing goddamit fucking fuck shit ass OATS
rip