ur mum is lewd this isn't even from my private photos folder :X
forum
Post your legs. 3694d
posted
Total Posts
5,048
I bought more tights! Unfortunately, I managed to put a hole in one thigh while putting them on, but the thick ribbing's so warm and sensuous!
I'll edit this when I try my other pair~
Okay the other pair tore even worse--got a big ladder down the back of a thigh.
Thankfully, I'd never need to worry about how bad it'd look, since I won't be wearing them outside. Even if I did, I'd be wearing shorts to cover it up. I think this pair's lovely though. :3
I'll edit this when I try my other pair~
Okay the other pair tore even worse--got a big ladder down the back of a thigh.
Thankfully, I'd never need to worry about how bad it'd look, since I won't be wearing them outside. Even if I did, I'd be wearing shorts to cover it up. I think this pair's lovely though. :3D33d wrote: 6r722k
I bought more tights! Unfortunately, I managed to put a hole in one thigh while putting them on, but the thick ribbing's so warm and sensuous!
I'll edit this when I try my other pair~
Okay the other pair tore even worse--got a big ladder down the back of a thigh.
another metric ton of D33d PFFFFF!!!
I LOVE IT HAWTD33d wrote: 6r722k
I bought more tights! Unfortunately, I managed to put a hole in one thigh while putting them on, but the thick ribbing's so warm and sensuous!
images
I'll edit this when I try my other pair~
Okay the other pair tore even worse--got a big ladder down the back of a thigh.
images
The ladies' sizes went up to maybe a 32" waist (if that) and I'm just over 33. I have enough tights now anyway, but I've learned my lesson to avoid fast-fashion outlets. I couldn't resist those pairs when I saw them. Stupid Urban Outfitters/me for not losing weight.boat wrote: 627233
deed, if you insist on like nylons and thin less stretchy materials, buy a size bigger
you wont notice any visual difference and they just wont tear like that (and it's more comfortable anyways)
Left leg: Going to the knee cap there is bumps from the boneLoliFlan wrote: 3g3a5n
still waiting for my socks to arrive, until then.
Right leg: you're pretty good, snake/10
o3o YESS!LoliFlan wrote: 3g3a5n
still waiting for my socks to arrive, until then.
Looking tasty. I wonder what else about you is cute?picklebmp wrote: 1n221s
I feel like I shouldn't have posted in here but too late lol
DEEDIT: I got some lovely briefs today, but I dunno if posting them would be too lewd. Thoughts?
Okay, though I had to be a bit more careful about this one--they outline my junk far too well.
you'd be a nice chew toy.picklebmp wrote: 1n221s
I feel like I shouldn't have posted in here but too late lol
go on flan, ravage that ginger twink~LoliFlan wrote: 3g3a5n
you'd be a nice chew toy.picklebmp wrote: 1n221s
I feel like I shouldn't have posted in here but too late lol
A little; there are pecs up there as well. They look more convincing with less vague lighting.Sethlied wrote: 3e503b
mantitsD33d wrote: 6r722k
Okay, though I had to be a bit more careful about this one--they outline my junk far too well.
ALSO THIS ISN'T THE PLACE TO COMMENT ON TORSOS, comment on legs please and thank you.
Until you post your legs, I'm just gonna regard you as a bitter, jealous fart.Sethlied wrote: 3e503b
not my fault your mantits go to your legsD33d wrote: 6r722k
A little; there are pecs up there as well. They look more convincing with less vague lighting.
ALSO THIS ISN'T THE PLACE TO COMMENT ON TORSOS, comment on legs please and thank you.
Because we haven't had any backs of legs recently, I'm gonna be a spammy fuck. There are also no mantits in this one.
You know I love your legs♥Vyscosity wrote: 2b2z4m
ignore the blemish
I think Vyscosity's legs will have thier way with me :sD33d wrote: 6r722k
They're very tasty and they're in very tasteful legwear, with a sexy pose.boat wrote: 627233
it's just legs what's so special about them
I'm suddenly wondering what'll happen to these leg idols if an international meetup occurs. Bet it'd be fun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selectionboat wrote: 627233
it's just legs what's so special about them
TSK TSK keep doing math, Here's the real deal : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_fetishismmathexpert wrote: 211i10
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selectionboat wrote: 627233
it's just legs what's so special about them
because the truth is that natural selection comes down more to the health of the people, now my legs are very friggin healthy. but there are legs out there that are healthy but you just can't see it.
I'm pretty sure almost (if not absolutely) every facet of humans whether psychological or physical can be traced back to natural selection- including sexual fetishes. Actually, fetishes especially since sex is like, the main driver of evolutionary patterns. I'm not a biology buff though so idk ._.
However, if you wanted an explanation on inductive reasoning or delta-epsilon proofs than I would be glad to oblige~
However, if you wanted an explanation on inductive reasoning or delta-epsilon proofs than I would be glad to oblige~
gonna smack you in the chops if you try to talk about natural selection in the context of human sexual preferences within an evolutionary/adaptive paradigm without knowing what you're talking aboutmathexpert wrote: 211i10
I'm pretty sure almost (if not absolutely) every facet of humans whether psychological or physical can be traced back to natural selection- including sexual fetishes. Actually, fetishes especially since sex is like, the main driver of evolutionary patterns. I'm not a biology buff though so idk ._.
However, if you wanted an explanation on inductive reasoning or delta-epsilon proofs than I would be glad to oblige~
this is becoming a quintessential softcore prons thread instead of a hilarious and slightly ironic cringefest
PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST SPOILERBOX PICTURES THAT AREN'T JUST LEGS IN SOME FASHION OR ANOTHER
I like the exposed thighs. So biteable.Yoishi wrote: 6tz6i
hhnnngVyscosity wrote: 2b2z4m
ignore the blemish
Realizing how common hosiery fetishes are for example, do you really expect osu! s to just post legs and others to be like "cool legs bro" 300 pages later. I'm honestly surprised nobody has locked it, but I have seen forum mods themselves be creepy in this thread, so go figure.Ephemeral wrote: 4k296t
it's not too late to change it though
By the way, the underwear fetishism thread on wikipedia (totally relevant because it goes into hosiery and legs) is pretty badly sourced, but the talk page is fucking hilarious.
This is possibly the worst article on Wikipedia that I've ever seen. There are no mentions of jock straps, lycra, semitransparent underwear, or anything other than ladies underwear.
I've removed an image promoting the pedophile game "Kogaru Diaries" - see discussion at Wikipedia:Ani#Insertion of an image from a banned advertising their work depicting child sexual abuse
Knickers is a common UK term and the term knicker sniffing goes absolutely nowhere while panty sniffing returns search results. There should be a redirect for UK pervs.
"Redirect for UK pervs" sounds like a redirect link to the sex offender's , for any UK citizen who wishes to read about underwear fetishes. It's how David Cameron would want it.
mekadon_old
Softcore porn thread.
i would stroke your legs any dayEphemeral wrote: 4k296t
i'm all for fun, but i am 100% not for the creepy ass shit this thread has been for the past 10+ pages
i don't see why you can't ogle each other's legs without bein fuckin weird about it, like saying I'D LIKE TO STROKE THOSE LEGS and making vague allusions to sexual shit
And I would stroke yours sil. :3silmarilen wrote: 3y5n4j
i would stroke your legs any dayEphemeral wrote: 4k296t
i'm all for fun, but i am 100% not for the creepy ass shit this thread has been for the past 10+ pages
i don't see why you can't ogle each other's legs without bein fuckin weird about it, like saying I'D LIKE TO STROKE THOSE LEGS and making vague allusions to sexual shit
like I was telling vipper in PMs, you should make/host a chan or something for stuff like this. i am reluctant to close this thread because of how long it is (harhar), so if you don't do creepy shit for a little while and then resume doing it when i inevitably forget about this thread in a week or so you should be right as rain
uh please calm down, I simply just stated my suspicions about the subject and I itted my lack of extensive knowledge on the subject.Ephemeral wrote: 4k296t
gonna smack you in the chops if you try to talk about natural selection in the context of human sexual preferences within an evolutionary/adaptive paradigm without knowing what you're talking about
I've done plenty of autodidactic study on evolutionary biology but I haven't yet taken a true formal class on it– biology at the high school level is too shallow.