looking good after the blurry text was fixed. Good job peppy! 
forum
osu! release b20130220 6as2d
posted
Total Posts
88
Ca Calne
Inori wrote: 474s1t
Ah, awesome ^^
Upside-down o!m skins, WHEE!
...Wuh oh.
Um..
If any of you are using my osu!mania arrow noteskins, don't enable upside-down mode.
It reverses the arrows as well so up arrows will go to the arrows going down, etc.
tell me how did you do that ;w; i want to play like DDR and PIU ;w;
not really my fps at 1024x768 decreased from ~ 1000 to 90-150 max 300 in-gameBlaziken wrote: 2o273q
Their must of been some performance fixes since I can now play on Widescreen 1440x900 without lag.
I have almost the samexSensenmann wrote: 6h3k5r
nice update
BUT~
I can't barely reach 60fps anymore on shaders and I wased used to 140+ fps =~=
extrem lag spikes now
and i have quadcore processor with neat graphiccard x.x (didnt changed anything at the computer)
fps dropped dramatically
t/113032Ca Calne wrote: 66255u
Inori wrote: 474s1t
Ah, awesome ^^
Upside-down o!m skins, WHEE!
...Wuh oh.
Um..
If any of you are using my osu!mania arrow noteskins, don't enable upside-down mode.
It reverses the arrows as well so up arrows will go to the arrows going down, etc.
tell me how did you do that ;w; i want to play like DDR and PIU ;w;
that skin and all magic will be revealed.
So many bug fixes! Awesome update.
too bad that slider bug came along, kinda ruined today's mapping experience. t/119688
too bad that slider bug came along, kinda ruined today's mapping experience. t/119688
t/119648JeMhUnTeR wrote: 605c39
awesome updates <3
btw, what's this?
That shouldn't matter much, if at all. Monitors only refresh the image 60 times per second (i.e. 60 Hz), and it becomes difficult to see any changes between 100 FPS and above.Mio_96 wrote: 2p6h2l
not really my fps at 1024x768 decreased from ~ 1000 to 90-150 max 300 in-gameBlaziken wrote: 2o273q
Their must of been some performance fixes since I can now play on Widescreen 1440x900 without lag.
As far as I know, the only reason you'd want such a phenomenally high FPS count is so that no frames are accidentally discarded by the graphics card. That is, if the frame count was lower, the U wouldn't be checking the graphics buffer as often, meaning some frames are not shown. [I'm not certain if this also occurs between the monitor and the U also, though it's unlikely.]
After researching a little more, the preferred frame per second count for games is a multiple of the monitor's refresh rate, since that way, updates to the screen will be synchronized. This website has a nice explanation in the 'Think of that, too' section.
EDIT: Just checked myself, 60 FPS on low latency does differ quite a lot from 120 FPS. This explains all that I should have said, and vsync too.
It's very rare that you get a game engine where extra fps does not benefit perceived smoothness and input lag quite significantly. osu is one of the 99% that does benefit, especially due to its 'software' cursor. (with a software cursor I believe you need fps > the mouse hz for ideal input lag conditions)The Muffin Man wrote: 5x2e33
That shouldn't matter much, if at all. Monitors only refresh the image 60 times per second (i.e. 60 Hz), and it becomes difficult to see any changes between 100 FPS and above.Mio_96 wrote: 2p6h2l
not really my fps at 1024x768 decreased from ~ 1000 to 90-150 max 300 in-game
As far as I know, the only reason you'd want such a phenomenally high FPS count is so that no frames are accidentally discarded by the graphics card. That is, if the frame count was lower, the U wouldn't be checking the graphics buffer as often, meaning some frames are not shown. [I'm not certain if this also occurs between the monitor and the U also, though it's unlikely.]
60 FPS is already more than enough, so going from 1000 to 150 isn't a bad thing.
After researching a little more, the preferred frame per second count for games is a multiple of the monitor's refresh rate, since that way, updates to the screen will be synchronized. This website has a nice explanation in the 'Think of that, too' section.
EDIT: Just checked myself, 60 FPS on low latency does differ quite a lot from 120 FPS. This explains all that I should have said, and vsync too.
Ah, I didn't consider input lag. That was the problem I had on both vsync mode and low latency. Perceived smoothness is a bit arbitrary, though, since for me there is no discernible difference between ~140 FPS (Unlimited (Gameplay)) and 500 (Unlimited), and only a small amount of input lag on 120 FPS.Darkimmortal wrote: 1oh39
It's very rare that you get a game engine where extra fps does not benefit perceived smoothness and input lag quite significantly. osu is one of the 99% that does benefit, especially due to its 'software' cursor. (with a software cursor I believe you need fps > the mouse hz for ideal input lag conditions)
Mio_96 wrote: 2p6h2l
not really my fps at 1024x768 decreased from ~ 1000 to 90-150 max 300 in-gameBlaziken wrote: 2o273q
Their must of been some performance fixes since I can now play on Widescreen 1440x900 without lag.
I have almost the samexSensenmann wrote: 6h3k5r
nice update
BUT~
I can't barely reach 60fps anymore on shaders and I wased used to 140+ fps =~=
extrem lag spikes now
and i have quadcore processor with neat graphiccard x.x (didnt changed anything at the computer)
fps dropped dramatically
my fps has stayed at between 3000-5000 fps for a year now.
what recently changed was the option to use borderless window mode up to 1080p which solves the issue of not getting more than 60hz in fullscreen on 120/144hz displays
At the moment, some homebrew has been achieved on the Wii U - however, AFAIK, only Wii mode works. That is, you can play Wii homebrew games, which osu! may run on, but it wouldn't be easy.puffle32 wrote: 6y296l
Can you make a Osu! U (For WII U)?
The option of selling a properly published game isn't available, my friend. A Wii or Wii U port would be fascinating, though.
t/51694 here. you can the old template here
Sure: t/123276