Sign In To Proceed 435v5c

Don't have an ? 473g1v

osu! to create your own !
forum

OT! Rules Discussion: What exactly is considered a necro? 1yd50

posted
Total Posts
174
Topic Starter
Necro posting have been around for years. However, there isn't really a standard for what is a necro and what is not. This thread is specifically for the discussion on that issue.

My suggestion would be to consider any reply on a topic that hasn't been replied to for at least 60 days that isn't a pinned topic a necro.

Let's discuss.
to really define a necro we need to define what a dead thread is, since necroposting is bumping a dead thread, and a time cutoff isn't a very good answer for that imo, there are plenty of threads that get revived after a long time, because they weren't dead, people were just waiting for the next thing to happen, as that's the premise of the thread.

Is there a better way to know if a thread is dead than just an arbitrary time cutoff? Common sense is usually a good tell, but obviously people don't have that and its not great to have in rules. Some threads are basically dead on arrival while others basically last forever as long as someone re them.

thinking about it a bit more I guess not, dont know if theres a way to make a fair rule that can somewhat accurately pronounce a thread dead - since for it to really be dead, people need to not care and/or know about it anymore and I guess there's no way to know that if you arent around for a while unless you arent a retard and can read the room, which a rule cant do.

Maybe someone else has ideas, but I just dont really like the arbitrary time rule very much.
when this appears, maybe.
idk, I had to go to page 30 before that popped up and there are a lot of threads in between there that would definitely be considered dead.

WitherMite wrote: 4u135f

idk, I had to go to page 30 before that popped up and there are a lot of threads in between there are would definitely be considered dead.
they are smol necros u.u
"i'm not a necromancer, but i think a post can be considered a necro-post if it's useless and/or doesn't have any reply/views for a little bit of time (like in a week or so).
i mean, can a post that was uh... revived/necro-posted (or something) can be considered a necro-post again in the future?"

"and also, does the pinned topic that was locked considered as a necro-post or not?
that, i don't know, but i do know that if a post is locked but not pinned then it can be considered dead."

Itz_UwU_Playz wrote: v2tq

again, it's subjective:

This place considers a month.

This considers to be 2 weeks.

Some can consider it to be 6.

The problem here in the first place in that we are determining how much days for it to be seen as necro, when we all know that it differs from people to people, and just a simple Google search is just basically dogshit for that.

Just follow it with the mere definition (Posting to a thread that has been there for a long time that the thread topic became irrelevant and/or outdated) is already enough.
https://hypixel.net/threads/what-is-necroposting.1280081/

WesttlE wrote: 195k15

i mean, can a post that was uh... revived/necro-posted (or something) can be considered a necro-post again in the future?"
yes, here an example
what igor said
Topic Starter

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

what igor said
Add that to the Grand Edict.
So here's my take on it, guys.

If something has been inactive for 1-4 months, it's technically a smaller form of necroposting. We can let it slide but you're on thin ice IMO. Even more on thin ice if you post something NOT worthy to the discussion, but if it is worthy, then you're clear.

If something has been inactive for 4-12 months, then it's considered necroposting. If you show something worthy to the discussion, and the thread has not gone through it all and not done the "okay this thread can die now" vibe, then you're clear. If it does thave that vibe, or you're doing the same thing everyone else posted before, or it's not worthy, then you're a fucking idiot.

If something has been inactive for 1-2 years, it's definitely necroposting. If it is something to discuss, and it doesn't have the vibe of "this thread can die now", then MAYBE. But otherwise, it's better just to leave these threads alone because chances are whatever is in that thread is your answer.

If something has been inactive for 2+ years just fucking make a new thread if it so makes you curious.
> Add that to the Grand Edict.

Oh
a necro on a thread abt necropost

how the turns have tabled
i love this joke xD

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

Oh
THIS is a necro

Corne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

Oh
THIS is a necro
Oh
Damn
oh
How do I eat six lemons

ColdTooth wrote: 1g2nr

How do I eat six lemons
nom

Yhuan Debeste wrote: 5h2o60

ColdTooth wrote: 1g2nr

How do I eat six lemons
nom
Exactly

Yhuan Debeste wrote: 5h2o60

ColdTooth wrote: 1g2nr

How do I eat six lemons
nom
nom nom nom nom nom nom

ColdTooth wrote: 1g2nr

How do I eat six lemons
just push them in your mouth, one after the other

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

Oh
This is a good example of a necro.
manish <3

Lilyn wrote: 6t2j5d

manish <3
why i feel like this is a threat
I'm going to kill a monkey

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

Oh
my god, why?
Idk man its just funny for me
I'm not laughing.
Edit
You are potentially the least funny person I've ever seen

ghoulybits wrote: v2x52

You are potentially the least funny person I've ever seen
That's rude to say

You shouldn't saying something this true
According to my necro detection it's 6 months

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

According to my necro detection it's 6 months
No don't ban me

I was just giving an example of what not to do, to new generation

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

According to my necro detection it's 6 months
No don't ban me

I was just giving an example of what not to do, to new generation
You are the new generation. There is literally barely anyone else here that's newer than you.

ghoulybits wrote: v2x52

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

According to my necro detection it's 6 months
No don't ban me

I was just giving an example of what not to do, to new generation
You are the new generation. There is literally barely anyone else here that's newer than you.
That's not true

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

ghoulybits wrote: v2x52

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

According to my necro detection it's 6 months
No don't ban me

I was just giving an example of what not to do, to new generation
You are the new generation. There is literally barely anyone else here that's newer than you.
That's not true
No that's true

You are literally the newest guy on OT

ShinRun wrote: 4p6j2

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

ghoulybits wrote: v2x52

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

According to my necro detection it's 6 months
No don't ban me

I was just giving an example of what not to do, to new generation
You are the new generation. There is literally barely anyone else here that's newer than you.
That's not true
No that's true

You are literally the newest guy on OT
What about WontWork :)

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

ShinRun wrote: 4p6j2

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

ghoulybits wrote: v2x52

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

According to my necro detection it's 6 months
No don't ban me

I was just giving an example of what not to do, to new generation
You are the new generation. There is literally barely anyone else here that's newer than you.
That's not true
No that's true

You are literally the newest guy on OT
What about WontWork :)
Wow. Congratulations. There is one person newer than you. Do you want an award or something?

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

ShinRun wrote: 4p6j2

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

ghoulybits wrote: v2x52

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

According to my necro detection it's 6 months
No don't ban me

I was just giving an example of what not to do, to new generation
You are the new generation. There is literally barely anyone else here that's newer than you.
That's not true
No that's true

You are literally the newest guy on OT
What about WontWork :)
He's not active enough
god the new children has arrived i see
.......
Thats not fair

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

.......
Thats not fair
it actually is
the term "new person" and other akin to it aren't derogatory or anything, they're just a relative identifier for somebody that's new in a community
sorry, but suck a thumb if it hurts
There must be someone else too
Its been 6months i have ed

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

There must be someone else too
Its been 6months i have ed
6 months???

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

Idk man its just funny for me
its not.

manishmathur wrote: 49y5n

There must be someone else too
Its been 6months i have ed
no
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply 1b384i