{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n -Keitaro<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,029 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed October 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n -Keitaro<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-11-05T04:48:32+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n As requested :3format is [x, y][Dance]00:11:391 (6) - I feel like this is a lil bit different from the other, probaly move it to [421, 318] for better movement and emphasize00:47:327 (7,8) - move (8) a bit more far so it'll looks consistent with 00:48:610 (8,9) - 00:49:894 (8,9) - , etc01:02:888 (1,2) - since you're slowly moving faster from 01:01:926 (1) - so make the jump more faster, somewhere like 3,25x would be better imo01:14:279 (6) - I think its better to stack with 01:13:156 (6) - , it's more fit with the vocal, I think01:16:846 (6) - [312, 296] for better movement?[Battle]00:10:268 (5,2) - isn't this have a chance of misread?00:14:600 (2,1) - oops, overlap.00:18:931 (4,5) - this is different from the others, the others use sliders to ephasize a voice, why this one is 2 circles?00:27:434 (2) - [336, 264] for better visual with 00:27:594 (3,4) - ?00:29:359 (4,2) - overlap here :300:43:316 (5,2) - I dunno if you're trying to overlap here or not, but I would suggest moving (2) to [220, 24]01:27:113 (6) - possible triangle with 01:26:471 (2,4) -, it's up to you tho[Irohas]00:51:979 (2,3,4) - this stack doesn't look polished imo[Hard]00:03:851 (5,1) - not really sure if this is a good idea tbh, (1) is a bit too curved imo[Djulus]00:17:006 (3) - why not copy this note from 00:15:723 (1) - ? it looks way much better imo(why am I mentioning this) 00:40:749 (3,4) - fix up blanketI can't really mod this lol, no kds if not helpfulgood luck~<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Djulus<\/a>\n\n \n Beatmap Nominator\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 590 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed September 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Djulus<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-11-05T15:08:24+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n 1. Thats slider destroys my flow 2.its ok<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Arf<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 904 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed December 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Arf<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-11-07T18:50:16+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Man I'm extremely late sorry, haven't modded or responded to mods or done anything osu!mapping related for some days.M4M from your queueDjulus' Easy<\/span><\/u><\/strong>00:04:172 (3,4) - In every pattern similar to this, meaning these: 00:06:739 (3,4) - 00:09:305 (4,5) - 00:11:872 (3,4) - 00:14:439 (3,4) - wouldn't it sound better rhythmically if the note came before the repeat slider? What I mean to say is that I think this rhythm<\/a> works better than the current one because the repeat slider is mapped directly to the \"ni hai hai\" or \"hai hai hai\" vocal, which I think is better sounding to players of Easy difficulties.00:17:006 (3) - Small nitpick, probably irrelevant, but this being straight when 00:15:723 (1,1,3) - all of these are slightly curved is a little out of place. Also I think this pattern could look better if 00:17:006 (3) - was a flipped copy\/pasta of 00:15:723 (1) - , gives a symmetrical pattern which is visually maybe better than the current one. Up to you(minor)<\/em> 00:20:856 (1,2) - Consider blanketing these two sliders, the current placement looks like a failed blanket, even if that's not what you were going for with the pattern. I think it would also not disturb the flow very much to just move \"2\" to the right a bit00:46:525 (1) - Hmm I'm not sure about this at all. For me personally, it sounds a very strange rhythmic choice, the repeat is not on any sort of strong note at all, consider two 1\/1 sliders here instead, then your 1\/2 gap to the next pattern is intact. I recognize that this ruins your pattern placement and is a hassle but the current rhythm sounds odd to me. Up to you since this is very opinionated. Same at 00:51:658 (1) - 01:08:343 (3,4) - Same as the first point, I think it sounds better if the rhythm is note->repeat slider not the other way around. Same at 01:13:477 (3,4) - However, funnily enough, 01:10:910 (3,4) - sounds better to me as it is currently, probably because of the leading vocals.<\/span>Box of Extremely OCD things because Third Reich and also polishing on lowest diffs should be tip top<\/a>00:07:701 (4,1) - strange anti-blanket thing here,<\/a> probably irrelevant00:10:589 (1,2) - easy to miss, and I hate myself<\/a>00:31:124 (1,2) - Himmler would be sad<\/a>00:36:257 (1,2) - See how the top of the blanket<\/a> is unevenly showing compared to the bottom part<\/a>00:40:749 (3,4) - It's cold, I need a blanket<\/a>00:47:648 (2,3) - something something blanket<\/a>00:51:338 (4,1) - something something blanket<\/a>00:54:065 (4,1) - so minor it doesn't even matter, but if I'm listing them all I might as well. Left-right uneven etc<\/a>01:01:605 (5,1) - whee<\/a>There's two or three more but I'm reconsidering my life choices right about now, I don't know why I made this.<\/div><\/div>Normal<\/span><\/u><\/strong>Pretty safe difficulty, not much to say00:08:664 (3) - Wouldn't this be nicer if Ctrl+H'd? Gives a nice circular flow from \"2\" instead of the strange counter flow currently present. Doing this does ruin the counter flow from 00:08:664 (3,4) - though, which was actually pretty nice.01:23:744 (3,1) - Strange gap here, not sure why this isn't mapped.Hard<\/span><\/u><\/strong>00:14:760 (3,4,5) - I really liked how 00:04:493 (2,3,4) - had all three sliders as similar in a cohesive pattern making the emphasis special. Consider doing something similar here too00:30:161 (5,6,7) - I get that you wanted to make a small jump here but the flow is very strange in my opinion, consider Ctrl+G the \"6\" and \"7\" or maybe make a slightly different pattern00:56:953 (2) - Feels weird to me personally to play this as a stack when the beat is nowhere near as strong as the previous stacks at 00:43:958 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Consider deleting the second note and just stacking 1 on the next slider. Same at 00:59:359 (1,2) - 01:26:311 (1,2,3,4,5) - Are you sure you want to introduce something like this at the very end of the map considering nothing like this was really in the map before? It's a little evil to put something this difficult to read in a position like this. Consider changing up the patternCouldn't really find much, mapset looks good. Good Luck<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Affirmation<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,554 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed March 2015<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Affirmation<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-11-09T06:50:41+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Arf wrote:<\/h4>Normal<\/span><\/u><\/strong>Pretty safe difficulty, not much to say00:08:664 (3) - Wouldn't this be nicer if Ctrl+H'd? Gives a nice circular flow from \"2\" instead of the strange counter flow currently present. Doing this does ruin the counter flow from 00:08:664 (3,4) - though, which was actually pretty nice.well. I think this flowbreak pattern makes fun things for play,<\/span>01:23:744 (3,1) - Strange gap here, not sure why this isn't mapped.cause the lowest tension of this song, little bit downmapped.<\/span>Hard<\/span><\/u><\/strong>00:14:760 (3,4,5) - I really liked how 00:04:493 (2,3,4) - had all three sliders as similar in a cohesive pattern making the emphasis special. Consider doing something similar here toobut 00:14:760 (3,4,5) - tension is higher than others, same as last part.<\/span>00:30:161 (5,6,7) - I get that you wanted to make a small jump here but the flow is very strange in my opinion, consider Ctrl+G the \"6\" and \"7\" or maybe make a slightly different patternsimilar Ds with 00:20:215 (1,2,3) - <\/span>00:56:953 (2) - Feels weird to me personally to play this as a stack when the beat is nowhere near as strong as the previous stacks at 00:43:958 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Consider deleting the second note and just stacking 1 on the next slider. Same at 00:59:359 (1,2) - deleted 2 since it doesn't have beat.<\/span>01:26:311 (1,2,3,4,5) - Are you sure you want to introduce something like this at the very end of the map considering nothing like this was really in the map before? It's a little evil to put something this difficult to read in a position like this. Consider changing up the patternCouldn't really find much, mapset looks good. Good Luck<\/blockquote>Error- wrote:<\/h4>[Dance]00:11:391 (6) - I feel like this is a lil bit different from the other, probaly move it to [421, 318] for better movement and emphasizedoesn't need to be emphasized imo,<\/span>00:47:327 (7,8) - move (8) a bit more far so it'll looks consistent with 00:48:610 (8,9) - 00:49:894 (8,9) - , etcgood idea, but well, doesn't matter for playing imo.\/color]01:02:888 (1,2) - since you're slowly moving faster from 01:01:926 (1) - so make the jump more faster, somewhere like 3,25x would be better imo01:14:279 (6) - I think its better to stack with 01:13:156 (6) - , it's more fit with the vocal, I thinkwill consider it.<\/span>01:16:846 (6) - [312, 296] for better movement?ehh......... wanna make honeycomb pattern.<\/span>[Hard]00:03:851 (5,1) - not really sure if this is a good idea tbh, (1) is a bit too curved imoJust getting flow, I think this current pattern looks good now<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/blockquote>No reply=fixed. thanks for mod xD<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n Hishiro Chizuru\n <\/span>\n \n \n \n \n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hishiro Chizuru<\/span>\n\n \n 2017-11-10T21:56:12+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n m4mDjulus' Easy<\/strong>00:11:872 (3) - would straighten to keep consistent with other repeating sliders00:19:573 (3) - straight so 00:15:723 (1,3,1,3) - is systematic: slight curve, straight, slight curve00:23:102 (4) - I don't recommend this since it's not repeated anywhere else and this is an easy diff00:28:236 (4) - I personally wouldn't do any overlaps in an easy 00:38:503 (5) - 00:46:525 (1,2) - I really don't like this kind of pattern in an easy, but up to you to keep it. just throwing my opinion there. An easy should have no confusing rhythm at all01:24:707 (4) - same as beforeNormal<\/strong>00:21:979 (4) - why sudden change to vocals.00:52:781 (4) - I would ctrl-h for ease of flow00:55:348 (5) - change this too for better flow if you do what i suggested above. If not, don't change thisHard<\/strong>00:14:600 (2) - something like this but cleaned up a bit might be nice https:\/\/osu-ppy-sh.jeuxcrack.net\/ss\/9506203<\/a> 00:30:482 (6,7,8) - being spaced the same as 00:20:215 (1,2,3) - would be better imo00:58:717 (3) - angle a bit more counter clockwise to flow better with 00:59:359 (1) - 01:12:674 (2) - overlap looks messy01:26:953 (5) - https:\/\/osu-ppy-sh.jeuxcrack.net\/ss\/9506223<\/a> better flow from 01:26:792 (4) - and leads into 01:27:273 (1) - Irohas' Insane<\/strong>00:04:813 (1) - Faster sv and use red anchors to emphasize guitar riff plsplspls00:28:557 (1) - make single instead of slider00:42:354 (3,4) - would make these into a jump because there are vocals. 00:42:033 (1,2) - here u were following drums but still stacked00:46:525 (1) - custom hitsound seems inappropriate for the songBattle's Extra<\/strong>00:30:963 (7) - delete to be consistent with 00:23:102 (5) - All good no issuesDance<\/strong>00:05:455 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - and 00:10:589 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - use perfect stacks for single jumps, but the other same patterns don't. Why the reading challenge only on these jumps?all good no issuesgl<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Irohas<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,353 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Irohas<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-11-11T02:07:51+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n [ amb1d3x ] wrote:<\/h4>m4mIrohas' Insane<\/strong>00:04:813 (1) - Faster sv and use red anchors to emphasize guitar riff plsplspls i think sv is fine<\/strong>00:28:557 (1) - make single instead of slider consistency with 00:18:289 (1) - <\/strong>00:42:354 (3,4) - would make these into a jump because there are vocals. 00:42:033 (1,2) - here u were following drums but still stacked not really necessary since big claps to emphasize is on 00:44:600 (1,2,1) - so not obligated to spam jumps xd<\/strong>00:46:525 (1) - custom hitsound seems inappropriate for the song fine<\/strong>gl<\/blockquote>thx but no change for me<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Ohwow<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,202 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed July 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ohwow<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-11-11T04:04:11+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n ayyy[General]Missing videos on Djulus' Easy and Irohas' Insane00:36:257 - the volume is too low imo, 50% would be my suggestion and the next section could be 60%[Normal]01:24:707 - add circle here? I think that spot deserves to be clicked.[Hard]01:21:017 (5,1) - spacing might be a bit too far. Should at least reduce it to the same spacing as 01:18:450 (5,1) - The player stops moving at 01:20:856 (4,5) - cause they are stacked, but they are forced to moved really fast to 01:21:177 (1) - which could be tricky to play.[Irohas' Insane]00:57:915 (6,1) - I would ctrl+g this rhythm to follow vocal better. the downbeat on the white tick is barely noticeable.01:27:113 (3,1) - increase spacing? it's the strongest sound there and changing it would mak it so the ending doesn't feel anticlimatic.[Battle's Extra]00:19:894 (4) - this could be 2 circles instead of match the vocals, also to build a little more intensity.00:30:161 (3) - ^00:45:241 (1,2,3) - hmm not really liking how when i play here, the movement slows down really drastically. It would feel better if 00:45:241 (1) - is split into 2 1\/2 sliders imo.01:04:332 (11) - maybe do something like this: https:\/\/i.gyazo.com\/b8109e42fa8b539d0f7 ... 306372.jpg<\/a>that's all i could complain. good luck man <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Affirmation<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,554 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed March 2015<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Affirmation<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-11-11T07:49:14+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n [ amb1d3x ] wrote:<\/h4>Normal<\/strong>00:21:979 (4) - why sudden change to vocals.changed to vocals from 00:15:723 (1) - ...?<\/span>00:52:781 (4) - I would ctrl-h for ease of flow00:52:621 (3,4,5) - flow is okay in here...<\/span>00:55:348 (5) - change this too for better flow if you do what i suggested above. If not, don't change thisyea, for emphasis.<\/span>Hard<\/strong>00:14:600 (2) - something like this but cleaned up a bit might be nice https:\/\/osu-ppy-sh.jeuxcrack.net\/ss\/9506203<\/a> good suggeston, but don't want to change it.<\/span>00:30:482 (6,7,8) - being spaced the same as 00:20:215 (1,2,3) - would be better imosame emphasis... difference has only 00:20:375 (2,3) - and 00:30:482 (6,7,8) - DS?<\/span>00:58:717 (3) - angle a bit more counter clockwise to flow better with 00:59:359 (1) - 01:12:674 (2) - overlap looks messyhalf stacking looks good for me.<\/span>01:26:953 (5) - https:\/\/osu-ppy-sh.jeuxcrack.net\/ss\/9506223<\/a> better flow from 01:26:792 (4) - and leads into 01:27:273 (1) - I didn't use this slider, it can make weird patterns.<\/span>Dance<\/strong>00:05:455 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - and 00:10:589 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - use perfect stacks for single jumps, but the other same patterns don't. Why the reading challenge only on these jumps?well, doesn't matter for reading imo.<\/span>all good no issuesgl<\/blockquote>Ohwow wrote:<\/h4>[Normal]01:24:707 - add circle here? I think that spot deserves to be clicked.wanna make empty in here.<\/span>[Hard]01:21:017 (5,1) - spacing might be a bit too far. Should at least reduce it to the same spacing as 01:18:450 (5,1) - The player stops moving at 01:20:856 (4,5) - cause they are stacked, but they are forced to moved really fast to 01:21:177 (1) - which could be tricky to play.ehh, DS has similar with others, and need to be emphasized.<\/span><\/blockquote>Thanks for mod all xD<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Affirmation<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n 1m5a17