{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Foxtrot<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,165 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed April 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Foxtrot<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-10T00:45:49+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Hika wrote:<\/h4>my FoS is on Foxtrot cuz she was over analyzing but I could be over looking that<\/blockquote>I don't think I'm over-analyzing and your reads provided us with nothing. Why do you think Lincolm is red? Or why do you think John is town? Do you have concrete reasons behind your read? I know I haven't done one yet, but when I'll do, I'll try not to be lazy about it. And why do you think I'm over analyzing? Is it because I was onto Zekks, someone you've been trying to get our attention off from them? Your posts are also rubbing me off, and it seems like I'm not the only person who feels that way.Hika wrote:<\/h4>After bboy VC then I'll be able to narrow down my reads a bit further. I have more people in the red rather than green, sad to say<\/blockquote>Other people have been able to do reads without keeping track of VC and you're the only one doing this. Why should VC be important in your read? If someone has more votes or less votes, why would it matter towards your read? It just seems like you're waiting to see which person has most votes so you can deliver your coup de gr\u00e2ceFoxtrot wrote:<\/h4>Hika wrote:<\/h4>Lets just say in my opinion, I see it as a shitty town confirming tactic as well as a ballsy scum move. As I said before, I'd rather have an anti town than a scum deceiving me but if that anti town is being extremely counteractive in our scum hunting, I'd be willing to get rid of them D1 to save town the trouble of being confused later on down the road.<\/blockquote>I understand that it's your night out so I won't pressure you but next time please write your thoughts in a more detailed way, and provide more information as to why you think that way. This is still rather vague to me.<\/blockquote>And you asked me what I'd like you to explain, but you don't need to explain anything. It's just that you lack reasoning behind your claims like you've been doing in your read and past posts. You write really small sentences that can be rather vague or really obvious, which makes you hard to read. Why would you rather have anti-scum deceiving you? And if you know for sure someone is being anti-town, why vote for them when we could vote for scum instead? Do you want to get rid of anti-town right away because it's probably the most convenient vote?<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Zexion<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 308 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Zexion<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-10T00:46:52+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n johnmedina999 wrote:<\/h4>Zexion wrote:<\/h4>@John, @Dawnsday: why is Foxtrot so town? Going through her ISO shows little content in her lasts posts, last thing was the accusation to Zekks which I kinda understand but I don't see how she \"analyses players very well\". I do agree with she moving the game forward.<\/blockquote>By good analyses I was thinking of back in the beginning of the game, but you're right about recent posts not having much content. As for why I think she's town...her posts don't seem scummy, maybe she's pushing the Zekks train too hard after most decided to leave it for now (most of her longer, more recent posts have something to do with Zekks), but again, she doesn't really seem like she's mafia.<\/blockquote>I'm curious about this. If foxtrot is town for her analytical posts, then Lincolm should also fall into that category (specially for this post<\/a>, but you are (or were?) reading him as scum. Your reads aren't consistent.johnmedina999 wrote:<\/h4>It may just be my lack of experience, but I think Lincolm and abraker have been 1v1-ing for far too long, it's starting to look like bussing to me. Ever since this post<\/a>, where Lincolm invokes abraker out of the blue, and the two start arguing. This wasn't suspicious back then, but certainly looks suspicious now; Lincolm might say that he was one of the only people active at the time and that it was random, but there was redo and Zekks to ask as well; why would he specifically choose abraker to invoke?It doesn't help that almost all of both abraker's and Lincolm's posts have been fighting with each other, either. Either they're bussing each other, or one of them is town taking advantage of the situation.<\/blockquote>I don't really think both of them are scum, their dicussion seems to be a natural progression of the accusations, I mean, -it could be-, but I don't really see something indicative of bussing.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,553 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-10T00:54:47+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Okay one sec, I have to break everyone's posts down.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \u2261<\/span><\/span><\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n beeboy123<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 183 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed June 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n beeboy123<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-10T01:15:33+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Ace Timing replaces Dawnsday<\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,553 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-10T01:23:10+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/span>abraker<\/a>I'll quote where relevant and ask questions if I need to. Formatting is very hard for me right now so bear with me. @EVERYONE ELSE: Pink text is abraker's questions and comments, my response is underneath all the quotes in plain black text.Why would you be worried about so little votes?<\/strong><\/span>Hika wrote:<\/h4>why the fuck are there three votes on me that's crazy as fuck<\/blockquote>I said my quote above in a non-worried way. Hopefully you've learned my typing style? I was also bothered by it because I hadn't had time to say much due to irl stuff. This wasn't a 'scumslip' imo. Not saying I'm scum either. Just twice? What? Why even worry? Scummy vibe here<\/strong><\/span>Hika wrote:<\/h4>Oh alright I was just wondering cause I only getting voted twice<\/blockquote>Refer to my response above. ^ Leaning null, but kinda curious why the need to mention<\/strong><\/span>Hika wrote:<\/h4>p.s. RVS is over imo<\/blockquote>I said this to do a reaction test. No one really said anything, that's why I tried to talk to you about it to see if you had agreed with me on it but it was a misunderstanding. I personally thought that RVS over. that's kinda why I said I M O. And I see you are bothered that I asked you about it. I was trying to generate conversation but as I stated before, it was just a misunderstanding. Had you responded and agreed with me, I would have automatically placed you in my town reads, due to the fact we have a good amount of information pushing forward thus far. Why vote count? Are you afraid your partner zekks has too many votes?<\/strong><\/span>Hika wrote:<\/h4>need vote count b4 I vote Zekks<\/blockquote>Just recently I said I didn't want scum to do an 'accidental' hammer, which is why I'm willing to hold my vote off.<\/div><\/div>If I skipped any of your questions, feel free to quote them and tell me them. I felt as if I needed to answer all those that I see now. It's hard to see cause this post is long when I open it, lol.Also, I asked for vote count because I see you're on L-2 and didn't have time to read up the thread to confirm that. As I said, I've been on my phone recently. My reads obviously influence town and I didn't want anyone to be like \"okay so then vote abraker! *vote*\" and have someone sneaky accidentally hammer. I don't think anyone is understanding this. And I dont want to be the only fucking one concerned about that but it's odd that no one else is caring about that.To also clear some stuff up, I don't think anyone responded when Zexion asked if everyone knew how the matrix 6 setup was like. So if you don't understand why I'm so concerned with PR's, you're probably not taking the game seriously either. I don't want anyone to think Zekks is straight scum because of his threat that I have quoted here: [ - Zekks - ] wrote:<\/h4>As long as I'm still alive, no mafia can't stop me <\/blockquote>This puts me off so fucking bad you guys don't know. I'm not saying I'm not willing to vote him but it just doesn't feel right. I might be overthinking that, who knows.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \u2261<\/span><\/span><\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,553 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-10T01:24:26+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Real quick before I answer Foxtrot's post, it is possible to have more than 2 scum reads. I think it's fucked up abraker thinks I cant have that lol. Like I said, I currently have two leaning scum and one possible scum. Just talk to me and we can change that read, that's literally it But it looks like Zekks is inactive rn<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \u2261<\/span><\/span><\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,553 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-10T01:33:45+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Foxtrot wrote:<\/h4>I don't think I'm over-analyzing and your reads provided us with nothing. Why do you think Lincolm is red? Or why do you think John is town? Do you have concrete reasons behind your read? I know I haven't done one yet, but when I'll do, I'll try not to be lazy about it. And why do you think I'm over analyzing? Is it because I was onto Zekks, someone you've been trying to get our attention off from them? Your posts are also rubbing me off, and it seems like I'm not the only person who feels that way.<\/blockquote>That's why I was feeling suspicious. I just didn't see a reads list, that's all. You can read what I have posted for abraker and see if that works for you because I don't think you noticed what I've written the past bit.Foxtrot wrote:<\/h4>Other people have been able to do reads without keeping track of VC and you're the only one doing this. Why should VC be important in your read? If someone has more votes or less votes, why would it matter towards your read? It just seems like you're waiting to see which person has most votes so you can deliver your coup de gr\u00e2ce<\/blockquote>Invalid. I already have a strong disliking about how many votes are on abraker and have stated it like once or twice already. I'M the one holding my vote if you haven't noticed. My vote is all I have and I don't think you read my posts it seems. My reads still stand regardless of any vote changing from this point on unless someone else changes my mind. Foxtrot wrote:<\/h4>Why would you rather have anti-scum deceiving you? And if you know for sure someone is being anti-town, why vote for them when we could vote for scum instead? Do you want to get rid of anti-town right away because it's probably the most convenient vote?<\/blockquote>I think it's an obvious reason why I'd rather have anti-town deceiving me? I'm hoping you meant anti-town*. As I said, if I don't have any concrete leads for myself to believe a person is ing us, as a town, on scum hunting, they deserved to be voted out. I've always played my games like this. And you can see in previous games that we've HAD to do a PL cause someone's actions are so toxic, that the town feels like that other townie just needs to go. I say anti town because I'm speaking from a transparent point of view. Meaning, we all think we're town... 2\/9 of us aren't. I don't know which one of you guys aren't but all I know is that I'm going to vote for who doesn't go for town's win this game. That's all.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \u2261<\/span><\/span><\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Ace Timing<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 4 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed October 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ace Timing<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-10T01:34:50+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n I HAVEN'T READ ANYTHING BUT I'M JESUS SOHika<\/strong><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Also known as Nosferatu<\/a><\/span><\/strong>Keeping the lights on while you sleep...<\/span><\/em><\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,553 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-10T01:35:07+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n o3u4