{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,553 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-09T02:54:52+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Tell me what you'd like me to explain. And I won't reveal that until i see total votes. I'm saying john is coming up p much town for me.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \u2261<\/span><\/span><\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Zexion<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 308 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Zexion<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-09T03:06:02+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Foxtrot wrote:<\/h4>Zexion wrote:<\/h4>So... foxtrot was the first one to vote Zekks after he claimed no mafia can stop him. I'm really interested why he considered so much about this being scum indicative, these kind of claims can't be resolved D1 because there's just too much risk. Him not answering questions is a totally different matter tho. Are the rest of such wagon just oportunistic?<\/blockquote>I'm probably shooting myself in the foot by latching on Zekks's claim, but it's hard because there's not much content going on. But what other choice do I have, especially on D1? Like I said, I voted Zekks to get a reaction out of them but I got nothing. I might back down if it wasn't for the fact that a lot of new players tend to lurk the game when they have a mafia role, probably because it's a bit harder to play with a role like that.And abraker is already voting for himself for the sake of PoE and he genuinely thinks that's gonna help town in the long run, but that's just dumb. It's not worth losing two town people over this. Unless he wants to make us think that he's town, so it'd make sense if he's scum trying to gain our trust by doing something reckless,, claiming that it's for the greater good of town. That's why he's not backing down. That possibility doesn't sound too unrealistic. I'm glad people are wary of his actions.<\/blockquote>Yeah, there wasn't much more for content progression but you repeated the same thing... quite a few times. Your vote was kind of right tho, because that brought up the stronger claim. I definitely won't be up for a Zekks lynch right now, because new players also tend to be intimidated of the on-going discussion, there's a lot of question directed to him unaswered tho, but until he comes back, I can't be sure if he is still dodging them.I'm still not sure if Dawn's vote on Zekks after just was oportunistic or a well thought-pressure plan.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n johnmedina999<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 296 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed October 2016<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n johnmedina999<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-09T03:17:07+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Zexion wrote:<\/h4>@John, @Dawnsday: why is Foxtrot so town? Going through her ISO shows little content in her lasts posts, last thing was the accusation to Zekks which I kinda understand but I don't see how she \"analyses players very well\". I do agree with she moving the game forward.<\/blockquote>By good analyses I was thinking of back in the beginning of the game, but you're right about recent posts not having much content. As for why I think she's town...her posts don't seem scummy, maybe she's pushing the Zekks train too hard after most decided to leave it for now (most of her longer, more recent posts have something to do with Zekks), but again, she doesn't really seem like she's mafia.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n johnmedina999<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 296 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed October 2016<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n johnmedina999<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-09T03:26:41+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n I just noticed that quite a few people are still worried about the Zekks train so I take that bit back.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n beeboy123<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 183 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed June 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n beeboy123<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-09T05:08:38+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/span>Day 1, VC 2<\/strong>With 9 alive it takes 5 votes to lynch!<\/strong>abraker (3) -<\/strong> rEdo, Lincolm, abrakerHika (1) -<\/strong> ZexionrEdo (1) -<\/strong> [ - Zekks - ][ - Zekks - ] (1) -<\/strong> FoxtrotLincolm (1) -<\/strong> johnmedina999Not Voting (2) -<\/strong> Dawnsday, Hika,Mod Notes - There was an error in the last vote count which is currently fixed.<\/strong>Deadline: https:\/\/www.timeanddate.com\/countdown\/g ... nt=cursive<\/a><\/strong><\/div><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n rEdo<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 809 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2008<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n rEdo<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-09T06:19:05+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Foxtrot wrote:<\/h4>Zexion wrote:<\/h4>Besides, why did abraker vote himself after rEdo if he could have just done it without someone else triggering it? I asked rEdo why he chose abraker and he asked me who would I have chosen instead. I straight up told him I don't know. But he also didn't answer my question, instead asking me another one, and that's a way to dodge a question as well. so let me ask you again rEdo, why abraker?<\/blockquote><\/blockquote>That's because he's the most active in my could-be-scum-list, and I wanted to pressure him to fish out his reaction. That's how I usually (and I think that's how people should generally) use my vote. Why specifically abraker? He has shown that little information I could work him. I thought of pressuring john first, but then I realised he could scumslip by trying to get back on the Zekks wagon, because that seems like the easiest lynch scum could pull out today. And hell, that's what happened.I hate the fact that abraker has not answered my question (who's scum?) yet, too. I feel like I forced out his reads, but he doesn't seem to be actually hunting for scum.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n rEdo<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 809 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2008<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n rEdo<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-09T06:19:24+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n johnmedina999 wrote:<\/h4>I just noticed that quite a few people are still worried about the Zekks train so I take that bit back.<\/blockquote>lol<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Lincolm<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 258 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2011<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Lincolm<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-09T07:11:24+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n abraker wrote:<\/h4>abraker wrote:<\/h4>Lincolm: The only problem is that he bandwagons with no real justification. Just declare a bandwagon, he will be second to hop on it<\/blockquote>Slight correction: He bandwagons with no real justification, and makes it seem like it is a normal thing to do. I get it if you are trying to choke out activity or info, but it doesn't make sense otherwise.<\/blockquote>It is normal things to do in MS, but MS has 2 weeks for the day. It makes sense for me. You bandwagon people, you get his reaction, you get interaction between people why did they pressure that person initially and why didn't they pressure him. You townread him, you unvote.The thing is you're trying to make everyone who make bandwagons bad right now, so no one is going to vote their scumread, even for smallest gut, because \"he is bandwagoning people\". When this town are going to vote? When they are sure 100% someone is scum? If you scumread me, then you should have vote me instead self-voting.Maybe your previous game makes you more aware with everyone's vote, but let's be honest, you could just vote - unvote when you doubt your read - vote again and so on.Also, here is my statement regarding this :Lincolm wrote:<\/h4>So what? No one pressure. No one pushing. Waiting more contents. PoE is less accurate thing to find scum, but is there any accurate method to find scum without power role? Is it wrong to use PoE? Why is L-3 (or maybe you thought it was L-2) a dangerous thing for you? even rEdo (plus someone if you really thought it was L-2) doesn't tell explicitly why did he vote you.<\/blockquote>I want you to respond this.Uhh.. there is also many questions to ask to you but my bet you won't respond them.Hika wrote:<\/h4>also i just think it looks bad on lincolm to vote me after he sees a vote already on me, referring to an earlier page<\/blockquote>Why are you suddenly referring this?==Anyway, I understand this setup.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n rEdo<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 809 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2008<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n rEdo<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-09T07:29:34+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Lincolm wrote:<\/h4>Uhh.. there is also many questions to ask to you but my bet you won't respond them.<\/blockquote>Isn't the fact that somebody left a question unanswered also a valuable information to work with?<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,553 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-09T14:20:26+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n I said that because I want to vote Lincolm out.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \u2261<\/span><\/span><\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n 5n2o3c