{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Lincolm<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 258 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2011<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Lincolm<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-07T18:57:18+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n abraker wrote:<\/h4>He just latched on to you since you started being radioactive. Pointing out the bullshit stuff such as asking needless question like \"So any reason why 'fuck RVS'?\" is what he did. Other than that, if you can't figure out whether I think town on scum from what I wrote, then I can't figure either.<\/blockquote>It's not bullshit when you did RVS in your previous game. Somehow you changed to \"Nah, fuck RVS\". It is implying you're trying to changing your play style or you have changed in 6 months. I did not ask whether he is town or scum for you, but I asked why he is town more clearly, but you did answer this.Foxtrot wrote:<\/h4>You don't think he's scum, and yet you call him scummy. You're contradicting yourself there.<\/blockquote>I'm not contradicting myself. What am I trying to say is, he might be scum because he is ignoring all questions and doesn't do anything, but in his posts there are a lot of confidence yet carelessness that implying he is not scum. Town can trolling, can fence-sitting, can lurking, can looked scummy by anyone with any reason, but I have concluded that he is most likely (anti)town. Foxtrot wrote:<\/h4>And why should we stop focusing on Zekks if they might be possible scum? Waiting for other players is not a valid reason for it, because even if the other players come by that doesn't mean Zekks is not scum anymore. Everybody has actually posted here, but Zexion and rEdo haven't posted enough for me to get a read on them. Still, doesn't mean I shouldn't focus on Zekks; I got my read.<\/blockquote>I'm not saying you should stop focusing Zekks. I'm trying to tell that you should consider what if Zekks is town, go back and reread the thread again or maybe bring out new content as we still have 120 hours. Foxtrot wrote:<\/h4>Again, it seems like Zekks getting votes is bothering you too much.<\/blockquote>Yes, because everyone is (going) too focused on Zekks because of his play, or maybe I'm the one who too focused right now.Foxtrot wrote:<\/h4>Last time Zekks got pushed all they said was \"go ahead kill me that gives mafia higher chance to win\" instead of trying to reason with us. Isn't that kind of a rookie mistake to do when you have a red role? You've been playing this for quite a while, so you should probably know.<\/blockquote>Well, in my experience, every mafias were trying to win although it was his first game, like myself. But I can see some people don't like mafia role and said \"kill me please\" instead \"replace me\" because I thought about that when got mafia role 2 years ago, yet not confidence and careless.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Zexion<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 308 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Zexion<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-07T21:56:07+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Sorry, a bit disconnected right now.So what's the case on Zekks? Besides their bold claim about mafia to fear them which is pretty null right now. In any case, after a statement like that I definitely wouldn't lynch them today.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Zexion<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 308 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Zexion<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-07T22:00:46+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Hika wrote:<\/h4>I'm willing to stand my ground on voting an anti town but anti town > scum<\/strong> so we need to get off zekks a bit.<\/blockquote>oooh what? Pretty sure we win if we go the other way. A player may be anti-town, but still town after all. Hika wrote:<\/h4>There's no point in letting Zekks go off easy so pressure him harder to see what he's all about. @Zekks: what da fuck u think you doing playing the way you're playing<\/blockquote>Maybe it's just me, but if Zekks really meant what he wrote (and it was not some funny rvs stuff) then there's not much more to explain. I totally agree with the second phrase tho.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n abraker<\/a>\n\n \n Global \n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 8,355 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed July 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n abraker<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-08T02:02:12+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Hika wrote:<\/h4>@abraker: why do u think rvs is over? I agree with ya but I'd like to see what you're saying<\/blockquote>Looks like a critical reading question, \"Why do you think this character you don't care about in some dumb book is doing this thing?\" Hika wrote:<\/h4>p.s. RVS is over imo<\/blockquote>That's the only thing I reading regards to thinking rvs is over. Please quote whatever I said that might imply I think rvs is over. Do note it doesn't mean I never implied it, but I do want explicit text to make my life easier. you: \"So what do you think about it?\"me: \"Takes too long\"you: \"The new flatscreen?\"me: \"oh...\"Pretty much me everyday. Now let's be explicit here.Lincolm wrote:<\/h4>abraker wrote:<\/h4>He just latched on to you since you started being radioactive. Pointing out the bullshit stuff such as asking needless question like \"So any reason why 'fuck RVS'?\" is what he did. Other than that, if you can't figure out whether I think town on scum from what I wrote, then I can't figure either.<\/blockquote>It's not bullshit when you did RVS in your previous game. Somehow you changed to \"Nah, fuck RVS\". It is implying you're trying to changing your play style or you have changed in 6 months.<\/blockquote>What if I told you that I vote knowing I will likely regret the decision later? I vote when I am able to justify my vote since at least last game. Last time I voted Dawnsday as soon as soon as I had justification to vote, which was his mason crap. This time I am hesitant to vote zekks due to me being wrong about Dawnsday last game. This is why rvs sucks even if you can justify your reasons. Although it is debatable whether zekks caused rvs to be over. Oh there is the answer to Hika's question, which might or might not be following up on something I previously said. Although I am almost sure it's a follow up on something I said due to \"I agree with ya but I'd like to see what you're saying\". Will wait for the reply I guess.To whoever wants my history, here are my first, second, and third games I played. The previous game was my fourth.https:\/\/forums.tuuba.moe\/viewtopic.php?id=3<\/a>https:\/\/forums.tuuba.moe\/viewtopic.php?id=137<\/a>https:\/\/forums.tuuba.moe\/viewtopic.php?id=161<\/a><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n std skin 2021<\/a>: link<\/a>\u2002\u2002|\u2002\u2002mania skin 2021<\/a>: (vanilla ver<\/a> ~ hidden ver<\/a>)<\/span>osu!Skills<\/u><\/strong><\/a> - Compare your skills in a slightly<\/em> different way<\/strong><\/span>OT!neus<\/span><\/strong><\/a> - osu off-topic subforum's very own discord server<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,553 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-08T02:13:46+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Calm down Jesus fuck I thought when you said fuck RVS you were stating it in a way you thought it was overis okay just calm your nerves<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \u2261<\/span><\/span><\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,553 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-08T02:15:56+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Also Zex, when i said anti town > scum, I meant it as a way like \"sure he's anti town to me right now but I'd rather not vote for his lynch when we could be scum hunting\"hope that clears it up.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \u2261<\/span><\/span><\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,553 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Hika<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-08T02:19:53+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n oh shit I'm so slow I forgot we have possible PRs Slow your role bros, zekks could be a PR and doing it wrong<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \u2261<\/span><\/span><\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n abraker<\/a>\n\n \n Global \n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 8,355 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed July 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n abraker<\/a>\n\n \n 2017-08-08T02:28:57+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Zexion wrote:<\/h4>Sorry, a bit disconnected right now.So what's the case on Zekks? Besides their bold claim about mafia to fear them which is pretty null right now. In any case, after a statement like that I definitely wouldn't lynch them today.<\/blockquote>zekks didn't respond properly to Lincolm here<\/a>. Instead he responded with a unrelated thought here<\/a>, which I wrote my opinion about here<\/a>zekks also didn't respond to me here<\/a>And a couple dodgy posts by zekks: p\/6176135<\/a> p\/6177776<\/a>@LincolmAlso now that I look at it, why did you ask zekks about John twice here<\/a> and here<\/a>? You got your \"joke\" response from from zekks here<\/a>, WHICH YOU JOKED BACK, ACKNOWLEDGING THE ANSWER. Like what the fuck, man? Maybe that's why zekks didn't bother answering that one properly in particular?Hika wrote:<\/h4>Calm down Jesus fuck I thought when you said fuck RVS you were stating it in a way you thought it was overis okay just calm your nerves<\/blockquote>I try not to be angry, and sorry if it looked like so. Same with the content in this and future messages, pretend thet any \"angry\" text is emphasis. My tone might get like this due to irl events.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n std skin 2021<\/a>: link<\/a>\u2002\u2002|\u2002\u2002mania skin 2021<\/a>: (vanilla ver<\/a> ~ hidden ver<\/a>)<\/span>osu!Skills<\/u><\/strong><\/a> - Compare your skills in a slightly<\/em> different way<\/strong><\/span>OT!neus<\/span><\/strong><\/a> - osu off-topic subforum's very own discord server<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n 5g2p64