{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Zectro<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 371 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed April 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Zectro<\/a>\n\n \n 2015-11-09T15:42:35+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Heya! o\/ (m4m)[Pick Me!!]00:01:699 (3) - This slider's shape looks a bit too weird for just the beginning of the map, 00:04:307 (3) - this is fine though.00:03:981 (2,3) - You could try blanketing these a bit better00:05:449 (3,2) - These are a little bit close together00:08:873 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This pattern could use some work, doesn't look\/play too well00:18:003 (1,2) - Kinda skeptical about this nc00:30:720 (5,4,5,6) - Avoid overlap01:12:133 (4,2) - A little bit more space between these please01:19:960 (3,4) - Move these to x301y209 or something like that01:27:133 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Again kinda skeptical about this pattern02:16:699 (4) - Slider looks a bit too weird, could use a tiny nerf02:22:731 (4,5,6,2) - Avoid this overlap too02:30:394 (4,2) - Once again could use a bit more space02:32:188 (5,2) - Use the same distance as 02:33:818 (1,2) - Great diff, so close to being ready for ranking.[Forbidden!!]00:18:492 (2) - Move this to x116y120, move 00:18:981 (3) - and 00:19:307 (1) - accordingly00:19:307 (1) - Looks kinda weird and feels like it doesn't belong there00:21:182 - There's a beat here so I'd expect a tripple00:31:699 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - This stream looks a bit bad, would recommend remaking it00:35:449 (1,2) - Spacing between these and 00:35:531 (2,3) - looks different01:44:742 (4) - Slider could use some work01:53:710 (1,2,3) - Fix spacing between these01:59:742 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - I wasn't really a fan of the first pattern, are you sure you want to keep this? Kinda boring imo02:08:465 (4,5) - This curved tripple looks kinda meh since the ds is so low on it02:25:666 (1) - This slider could use some work for sure02:28:275 (1) - This extreme curve is also rather unnecessary02:38:710 (4,5) - This is kinda weird and doesn't really fit the mapping style02:40:014 (8,1) - Same as above but you could make 02:38:710 (4) - straight aswell, instead of curving it02:42:623 (4) - Yeah these sliders are too short to be this curved I think. Doesn't look good02:47:025 (3) - Nc02:47:351 (5) - ^02:48:329 (3,5) - ^02:49:307 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - Wait what you had a very basic mapping style this whole time and now outta nowhere you follow a kinda background noise to make a very complicated pattern?03:33:493 (7,8,1) - Why does the spacing seem so off on a lot of these tripples? Maybe because you have grid snap enabled? s:03:47:188 (1,3) - Please use some more distance between these03:52:405 (1) - This slider is kinda weird O.oGreat mapset, hope it gets qualified soon o\/<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Seijiro<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 3,438 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed April 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Seijiro<\/a>\n\n \n 2015-11-11T10:00:54+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Ok, sorry guys, but as I say almost everywhere I post something, I'm really busy during the week so it may took till the weekend to get a reply from me, really sorry :\/Maybe I'll try to get someting done today in the evening... \"\"\"maybe\"\"\"<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Sotarks<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 3,552 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Sotarks<\/a>\n\n \n 2015-11-11T16:01:22+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Hey all,<\/strong>So please don't mod my GD<\/u> \"Sotarks' Insane!!<\/span><\/strong>\", i'll remap it from A to Z.<\/span>Reasons<\/a>- Not quit satisfy with my standards<\/em>- Some paterns looks horrible atm, because I improved my mapping style<\/em>- And I want this mapset ranked, so I'll really concentrate on something nice.<\/em><\/div><\/div>The GD will be probably ready since 4 days~ tho.Thanks <\/span>anyway for all modders for my diff.. Chears'<\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Seijiro<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 3,438 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed April 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Seijiro<\/a>\n\n \n 2015-11-13T14:10:42+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Doormat wrote:<\/h4>Oh hey you finally finished you map, I\u2019m going to mod it now okayKind of funny how we\u2019re both mapping the same song-Difficulties looked at: Easy!!<\/strong>, Normal!!<\/strong>. Hard!!<\/strong>, Insane!!<\/strong><\/em>- bolded difficulties are the ones that I modded; didn\u2019t take a look at Sotark\u2019s Insane because apparently he\u2019s remapping it and didn\u2019t look at the Extras or Hitsounds because I\u2019m fairly busy this week, plus you modded four of my difficulties so it's about even-<\/li><\/ul>General<\/strong><\/u><\/span><\/span>Delete your Hitsounds difficulty dude; we don\u2019t need to see it <\/li>Your .mp3 is 128kbps. Preferably you want 192 kbps. If you want you can steal<\/del>use my mp3 The volume seems fine, so I'll keep the current one for now<\/span><\/li>If you\u2019re going to use a drum sampleset, I\u2019d add a custom drum-hitnormal; it\u2019s incredibly quiet and sometimes I\u2019m not even sure if I was even hitting the note properly Volume fixed, now they are hearable. And why people keeps telling me to use custom hitsounds when there is no absolute need for them...<\/span><\/li><\/ol>Easy!!<\/strong><\/u><\/span><\/span> 00:32:351 (1) \u2013 Use something like 00:33:655 (2); a 2\/1 slider doesn\u2019t fit with the rhythm here in my opinion Not for me ._.<\/span><\/li>00:46:046 (2,3) \u2013 I don\u2019t think you should follow the vocals here; the instrumentals are pretty powerful here. Try something like this instead maybe?<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div>Using such a rhythm ruins all the other patterns, since you change from a 2\/1 pattern to a 1\/1 one. The difference is really noticeable and feels awkward to return to the 2\/1 pattern later on<\/span><\/li>00:47:351 (3) \u2013 If you insist on following the vocals and ignored the suggestion above, then make this a 1\/1 slider so that it at least matches the vocals. If you did take the above suggestion, then you can ignore this Changed the whole pattern to match that 1\/1 rhythm<\/span><\/li>00:56:481 (2,3) \u2013 ^ This isn't the same tho...<\/span><\/li>01:10:666 (4) \u2013 I don\u2019t recommend having a slider end on the downbeat here I can't see the problem tho...<\/span><\/li>01:48:003 (1,2) \u2013 Just make this into a 4\/1 slider; it feels really weird because it\u2019s not really matching any rhythms I won't make this map more dumb than it already is lol<\/span><\/li>01:50:612 (1) \u2013 Same suggestion as 00:32:351 (1) Nope<\/span><\/li>02:04:307 (2,3) \u2013 Same suggestion as 00:46:046 (2,3) Same<\/span><\/li>02:14:742 (2,3) \u2013 ^ Same<\/span><\/li>02:28:927 (4) \u2013 Same suggestion as 01:10:666 (4) Same<\/span><\/li>03:01:046 (3) \u2013 I\u2019d start a New Combo here Ops, my bad<\/span><\/li>03:25:177 (2,3) \u2013 Same suggestion as 00:46:046 (2,3) Same<\/span><\/li>03:35:612 (2,3) \u2013 ^ Same<\/span><\/li>03:38:220 (2,3) \u2013 ^ Such a pattern is the only thing I can do on such a song for this diff anyways...<\/span><\/li><\/ol>Normal!!<\/strong><\/u><\/span><\/span> 00:01:699 (3,1) \u2013 This feels a little weird to me; maybe combining these into one slider instead of separating them like this? Feels perfectly fine for me tho...<\/span><\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>00:03:003 (5) \u2013 This slider feels too long in my opinion; shorten it into a 1\/1 slider It's still a Normal and I'd rather use more longer sliders instead<\/span><\/li>00:30:883 (4,1) \u2013 Maybe try reversing the order of these (place the repeat slider before the circle) The first object is meant to give time to read the whole pattern and besides, I want emphasis on the second slider, not the first one<\/span><\/li>00:48:003 (3) \u2013 Start the new combo here and not at 00:47:514 (1); this is where the new phrase starts, not there Moved NC on (4) instead<\/span><\/li>01:19:960 (3,1) \u2013 Same suggestion as 00:01:699 (3,1) Nope<\/span><\/li>02:59:742 (3) \u2013 New combo here, not at 03:00:068 (1) Sure<\/span><\/li>03:24:525 (2) \u2013 NC here and not at 03:24:199 (1) Fixed<\/span><\/li>03:53:873 (3,1) \u2013 Same suggestion as 00:01:699 (3,1) Same<\/span><\/li><\/ol>Hard!!<\/strong><\/u><\/span><\/span> 00:11:481 (3) \u2013 NC here, not at 00:11:155 (1); explained to you in previous difficulties<\/li>00:34:960 (2) \u2013 NC here instead<\/li>00:45:883 (2) \u2013 I\u2019d move this so that it stacks with 00:46:046 (3); it\u2019s a little hard to see in my opinion<\/li>01:09:362 (5) \u2013 Similar suggestion to the above for this one<\/li>02:04:144 (2) \u2013 I\u2019d move this to stack (3) instead<\/li>02:56:318 (1) \u2013 In my opinion, I don\u2019t think this beat is strong enough that you should place a circle on it; I\u2019d delete this<\/li>03:23:057 (2) \u2013 I\u2019d place the new combo here instead<\/li>03:24:525 (2) \u2013 New combo here instead<\/li><\/ol>I didn't change the NCs<\/span>Stacks fixed<\/span>I didn't remove that circle since it is necessary for the pattern<\/span>Insane!!<\/strong><\/u><\/span><\/span> 00:27:460 (1) In my opinion, this NC feels unnecessary<\/li>00:28:765 (1) \u2013 ^ Fixed both<\/span><\/li>00:33:492 \u2013 Missed a beat here I think; add a circle? Is there a beat there? o.o<\/span><\/li>01:10:678 (3) \u2013 This isn\u2019t snapped I dunno why...<\/span> <\/li>01:42:786 (1,2) \u2013 Maybe you can make these 1\/2 sliders? The pace here is pretty fast, so I think using circles downplays the pace Focusing on vocals and it's \"jumps\"<\/span><\/li>01:45:720 (1) \u2013 Unnecessary NC <\/li>01:47:025 (1) \u2013 ^ Fixed both<\/span><\/li>01:51:753 \u2013 Yeah I think you missed another bass beat here Now I hear it, the problem is that it is a ive beat which is barely noticed even into the editor, so no<\/span><\/li>02:24:036 (5) \u2013 I think you should divide these up into something like you did at 01:05:775 (1,2,3) to emphasize the vocals Tbh, I prefer the long note here, dunno why tho...<\/span><\/li>02:56:400 (2,3) \u2013 Distance between these might be a little extreme for a double in my opinion; I\u2019d stack these They are 1\/2 apart, they aren't a a double =w=\"<\/span><\/li>03:00:394 (3) \u2013 This repeat slider doesn\u2019t make sense to me; I\u2019d take it out and try a different rhythm. If you insist on keeping it, then lower the hitsounds for this part because it\u2019s killing my ears x-x How old was your version of the map lol. I changed that a long ago since it was indeed crappy <\/span><\/li>03:08:220 (1) \u2013 A stream starts here, if you want to use it- Yeah, there is already a (stacked) stream there...<\/span><\/li>03:23:873 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) \u2013 I don\u2019t hear a stream here; I think this part is being overmapped I know it is a bit strange, but there are background beats there (and it isn't the only overmapped part in any case...)<\/span><\/li>03:49:960 (1,2,3,4) \u2013 This part sounds overmapped as well; I\u2019m not hearing any streams start until 03:50:286 (1) That's not overmapping tho o.o<\/span><\/li>04:01:698 (5) \u2013 I\u2019m fairly sure the stream starts here Listen to it at 25% playback rate and find out yourself :3~<\/span><\/li><\/ol>--Yeah okay, now we\u2019re square. Good luck!<\/blockquote>Thanks for the mod~Zectro wrote:<\/h4>Heya! o\/ (m4m)[Pick Me!!]00:01:699 (3) - This slider's shape looks a bit too weird for just the beginning of the map, 00:04:307 (3) - this is fine though. They're both fine for me tho x)<\/span>00:03:981 (2,3) - You could try blanketing these a bit better Moving 2 downwards will create a little overlap which I'd like to avoid. The blanket isn't that bad anyways...<\/span>00:05:449 (3,2) - These are a little bit close together Fixed<\/span> 00:08:873 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This pattern could use some work, doesn't look\/play too well Why? xD<\/span>00:18:003 (1,2) - Kinda skeptical about this nc rip NC<\/span>00:30:720 (5,4,5,6) - Avoid overlap The previous object disappears in time<\/span>01:12:133 (4,2) - A little bit more space between these please Tbh, I thought it out like that. Without such spacing it wouldn't be the same<\/span>01:19:960 (3,4) - Move these to x301y209 or something like that Blanket not intended at all. I used the parallel lines of the previous sliders and changed the shape of it<\/span>01:27:133 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Again kinda skeptical about this pattern Do you not like geometric patterns? .-.<\/span>02:16:699 (4) - Slider looks a bit too weird, could use a tiny nerf The player just needs to go straight. The \"curves\" on it are jsut for aesthetic reasons<\/span>02:22:731 (4,5,6,2) - Avoid this overlap too The previous object disappears in time<\/span>02:30:394 (4,2) - Once again could use a bit more space Already answered<\/span>02:32:188 (5,2) - Use the same distance as 02:33:818 (1,2) - That's not even the same pattern, why should I use the same spacing? .-.<\/span>Great diff, so close to being ready for ranking.Great mapset, hope it gets qualified soon o\/<\/blockquote>Thanks for your mod~ :3I'll deliver mine today at most (hopefully)Updated!<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 4o4n48