Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I do wish these forums used Discourse instead of what I assume is something custom made by peppy and co.

Ewww proprietary software with AI integration 🤮🤮🤮

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I do wish these forums used Discourse instead of what I assume is something custom made by peppy and co.

Ewww proprietary software with AI integration 🤮🤮🤮

Expect it isn't?

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I do wish these forums used Discourse instead of what I assume is something custom made by peppy and co.

Ewww proprietary software with AI integration 🤮🤮🤮

Expect it isn't?

oh I was wrong

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I do wish these forums used Discourse instead of what I assume is something custom made by peppy and co.

Ewww proprietary software with AI integration 🤮🤮🤮

Expect it isn't?

Seems kinda complicated and overkill for OT...

Corne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I do wish these forums used Discourse instead of what I assume is something custom made by peppy and co.

Ewww proprietary software with AI integration 🤮🤮🤮

Expect it isn't?

Seems kinda complicated and overkill for OT...

This isn't for OT in particular, but for the forums entirely.

So it was oxidation, but Intel are pussies (or more likely try to cover up something) to say that.

Very interesting how they're delaying this one due to quality. Extremely interesting, considering what is happening with their rival. I think one review slipped, but it was only for gaming performance and it wasn't that big of an improvement over their flagship X3D chip, if I correctly. I doubt they can squeeze more performance out of the Us now, but it will be interesting to see.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Very interesting how they're delaying this one due to quality. Extremely interesting, considering what is happening with their rival. I think one review slipped, but it was only for gaming performance and it wasn't that big of an improvement over their flagship X3D chip, if I correctly. I doubt they can squeeze more performance out of the Us now, but it will be interesting to see.

no matter what happens they'll still be winning over intel as of the moment

unless they also somehow do the same mistake, which would be really funny to see

Lapizote wrote: 6h554d

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Very interesting how they're delaying this one due to quality. Extremely interesting, considering what is happening with their rival. I think one review slipped, but it was only for gaming performance and it wasn't that big of an improvement over their flagship X3D chip, if I correctly. I doubt they can squeeze more performance out of the Us now, but it will be interesting to see.

no matter what happens they'll still be winning over intel as of the moment

unless they also somehow do the same mistake, which would be really funny to see

Yeah. I think they're trying to avoid that as much as possible.

Secure Boot is completely broken on 200+ models from 5 big device makers: Keys were labeled "DO NOT TRUST." Nearly 500 device models use them anyway.

💀

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Secure Boot is completely broken on 200+ models from 5 big device makers: Keys were labeled "DO NOT TRUST." Nearly 500 device models use them anyway.

💀

anything that should be done?

z0z wrote: 2h2d46

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Secure Boot is completely broken on 200+ models from 5 big device makers: Keys were labeled "DO NOT TRUST." Nearly 500 device models use them anyway.

💀

anything that should be done?

Not really, besides the usual things:

1. Keep your system up-to-date
2. Apply common online security rules and guidelines
3. Update your BIOS, if you can do it safely

Winnyace seems very invested in this thread.

I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p

Winnyace seems very invested in this thread.

he triple posted twice lmao, guess the old rules are no more

ps: it was more than two times

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p

Winnyace seems very invested in this thread.

he triple posted twice lmao, guess the old rules are no more

ps: it was more than two times

The concept of the thread calls for it.
Also it's allowed in OT.

I made this under $700 budget build

https://ca.partpicker.com/list/cMm7t7

Yeah I know it's not the best and I won't buy it for a few months but parts are expensive in my neck of the woods but it still destroys my current system.

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p

Winnyace seems very invested in this thread.

he triple posted twice lmao, guess the old rules are no more

ps: it was more than two times

The concept of the thread calls for it.
Also it's allowed in OT.

it wasnt when I got here
if its allowed then its the dumbest idea possible, I'll make a thread where no one has interest on and will keep posting on it so it'll always be on top

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p

Winnyace seems very invested in this thread.

he triple posted twice lmao, guess the old rules are no more

ps: it was more than two times

The concept of the thread calls for it.
Also it's allowed in OT.

it wasnt when I got here
if its allowed then its the dumbest idea possible, I'll make a thread where no one has interest on and will keep posting on it so it'll always be on top

maybe it could be argued that your hypothetical thread might've been allowed on the basis of equally as substantively on-topic as winny's additions would be. attempting to edit a singular post would probably not be intuitive for new developments, and patatitta would probably not have many options either if it weren't for that review thread being comparably more active

so any issues with rule inconsistency would probably prioritize something more akin to distinguishing between on-topic substance and purposeless spam

less notably, winny's posts also consist of sincere replies to others' comments

I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p

Winnyace seems very invested in this thread.

Okay and?

Cool thread.

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p

Winnyace seems very invested in this thread.

he triple posted twice lmao, guess the old rules are no more

ps: it was more than two times

The concept of the thread calls for it.
Also it's allowed in OT.

it wasnt when I got here
if its allowed then its the dumbest idea possible, I'll make a thread where no one has interest on and will keep posting on it so it'll always be on top

If the GMTs find it destructive in some way, lock this thread, but I will tell you that the moment this gets locked, y'all, and mostly you, will go through hell and back.

I know for a fact that some of you saw that last message and I still stand by it, but I don't want to silenced because some of y'all are mentally disabled. I will speak with the GMTs about this and if they find it shit or whatever, I'm done with OT. Y'all can go back to your shitposting.

great_elmo wrote: 6o1l6a

I made this under $700 budget build

https://ca.partpicker.com/list/CW88pB

Yeah I know it's not the best and I won't buy it for a few months but parts are expensive in my neck of the woods but it still destroys my current system.

Motherboard s that U with a BIOS update. Might be good to pick another one that doesn't have that issue. PartPicker tells you about compatibility on the list itself.

Alongside that, an ARC GPU is interesting. They got better from launch, that's for sure, but depending on what you play, they might not provide the best experience. Something like a 6500XT or a 6600XT would be better, but it seems that they're in another price range, so I guess that can work.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

I AM VERY SMART wrote: c2x1p

Winnyace seems very invested in this thread.

he triple posted twice lmao, guess the old rules are no more

ps: it was more than two times

The concept of the thread calls for it.
Also it's allowed in OT.

it wasnt when I got here
if its allowed then its the dumbest idea possible, I'll make a thread where no one has interest on and will keep posting on it so it'll always be on top

If the GMTs find it destructive in some way, lock this thread, but I will tell you that the moment this gets locked, y'all, and mostly you, will go through hell and back.

what the fuck lmao, do you think you're the punisher or what boy

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I know for a fact that some of you saw that last message and I still stand by it, but I don't want to silenced because some of y'all are mentally disabled. I will speak with the GMTs about this and if they find it shit or whatever, I'm done with OT. Y'all can go back to your shitposting.

i saw, and i have some sympathy for the offense taken with it-- i think this thread is entirely fine, i'm not sure what poly's doing with that critique but i'd hope/speculate that it could be more an extension of poly's distaste for the gmt mixed with a callously-exaggerated disinterest in this thread...

...it sounds like there's a certain kind of collective exasperation with the state of off-topic going on, and i worry that without charitable communication some people will just alienate each other here as attitudes continue to diverge in different directions about how to participate in ot

as for iavs, i think they're just being frustrating for some reason. my general impression is that they think the quality of off-topic (and its s) is generally a dumpster fire with particular glimpses of gold or something. there's this cold distant antagonistic tone to most of their replies that really doesn't help to create anything constructive, and there's supposedly some sort of "antagonist"/"antihero" arc going on there with "no regrets" and "i dont care" that doesn't really make any sense to me

i primarily want to suspend my impressions of these people for now until i understand people better, but it sounds to me that tensions between maybe 25%-40% of off-topic are moderately high. not necessarily emotionally/universally, but there is some conflict

idk, i hope people leave you alone to do your thing with tech, it's something you actually enjoy and it'd be neat if you were afforded some freedom to share your thoughts on what you find

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

he triple posted twice lmao, guess the old rules are no more

ps: it was more than two times

The concept of the thread calls for it.
Also it's allowed in OT.

it wasnt when I got here
if its allowed then its the dumbest idea possible, I'll make a thread where no one has interest on and will keep posting on it so it'll always be on top

If the GMTs find it destructive in some way, lock this thread, but I will tell you that the moment this gets locked, y'all, and mostly you, will go through hell and back.

what the fuck lmao, do you think you're the punisher or what boy

y'all should take this outside, or maybe avoid escalating with each other lmao
poly in particular, because from my angle, you sort of ignited this one by insisting on nitpicking the thread and aggravating winny

your jokes are our jokes until they aren't funny to most of everyone in the room, or something

i doubt winny cares about projecting a punisher persona, i don't care about projecting an "erm actually" persona, we both are probably just being genuine about what we care about. being dismissive and sarcastic hardly does you any favors if you're genuinely confused about why someone would be taking issue with your posts

cool how I never attacked the thread idea whatsoever, but thats the perception I guess.

also for winny, threatening people online with a bad time is the most impotent helpless shit you can do lol (in a serious note, please find a professional to manage your anger issues)

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

cool how I never attacked the thread idea whatsoever, but thats the perception I guess.

i must've misunderstood what you've meant then;;

in that case, what did you mean by

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Karmine wrote: 6c5h1b

The concept of the thread calls for [double-posting and triple-posting].

Also it's allowed in OT.

it wasnt when I got here
if [double-posting and triple-posting, on the basis of a thread's idea giving it freedom to exist] is allowed then its the dumbest idea possible, I'll make a thread where no one has interest on and will keep posting on it so it'll always be on top

...only now do i realize i would've likely misinterpreted that... i had the impression you were saying the thread idea was the dumbest idea possible, and that "i'll make a thread where no one has interest" was an implied shade at winny

at least. if i'm taking you at your word, then i would concede that my frame of perspective was pretty skewed, it's difficult to read into what people are saying. that ission doesn't really change that it must look baffling for people to misread you entirely

not trying to mess with you ;-; in any case i hope that resolves and clarifies something, though i guess that still leaves the double-posting/triple-posting observation

i still don't really read that very charitably when it would seem like such a trivial thing to point out (maybe it's just a general observation unrelated to the thread, where pointing winny out specifically was instrumental in some sense to questioning that ability to post consecutively), there would've been a few possible interpretations of that you might not have cared to project into the conversation at all

I meant that, if that rule is dead, it can be easily exploited. its not related to this thread... at all.
I tried starting a new branch of discussion, because talking online is (or at least was) a fun experience.

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

I meant that, if that rule is dead, it can be easily exploited. its not related to this thread... at all.
I tried starting a new branch of discussion, because talking online is (or at least was) a fun experience.

that's much clearer, ty ^^ having fun online and starting conversations is a fair sentiment, though something like this is probably an unfortunate choice of words/timing

hopefully winny will be fine, hopefully other people will be reasonable

The GMTs can lock the thread. I am done with OT for the foreseeable future.

EDIT: I have sent Blushing a few DMs and I've sent a report form too to the "government". I will see the replies I get and then choose how to proceed.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

The GMTs can lock the thread. I am done with OT for the foreseeable future.

fair enough :( i thought the tech thread was compelling and valuable, but i hope you'll be well, wherever you go

rip winnyace

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

The GMTs can lock the thread. I am done with OT for the foreseeable future.

fair enough :( i thought the tech thread was compelling and valuable, but i hope you'll be well, wherever you go

I am frankly unsure what to do, though. I don't understand why I can't be let to just do my thing in my own thread.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

The GMTs can lock the thread. I am done with OT for the foreseeable future.

fair enough :( i thought the tech thread was compelling and valuable, but i hope you'll be well, wherever you go

I am frankly unsure what to do, though. I don't understand why I can't be let to just do my thing in my own thread.

I mean, you can keep doing your thing nobody is stopping you lol, it was not supposed to be a big deal, your thread is not ruined

I have sent Blushing a few DMs and I've sent a report form too to the "government". I will see the replies I get and then choose how to proceed.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

The GMTs can lock the thread. I am done with OT for the foreseeable future.

fair enough :( i thought the tech thread was compelling and valuable, but i hope you'll be well, wherever you go

I am frankly unsure what to do, though. I don't understand why I can't be let to just do my thing in my own thread.

i think you will be left in peace, people just make reckless comments sometimes and we probably aren't in each other's heads to consider what would carry a possibility of real consequence. but i doubt they will have weight on the substance of the thread itself, and i doubt the gmt will find reason to take issue to the point of locking it. if anything, maybe this would be locked only if it does not return to the original subject of tech and continues to be argumentative, but... that argument, if it was one, is probably already over by now

it's entirely reasonable to care and continue to invest in the thread, and i think some people who've commented here did in fact find this tech corner to be meaningful enough to ask genuine questions about what they can do with what they have or what they're looking to purchase or install. if the thread remains here, it seems likely people will bring more genuine questions and accompanying commentary on whatever events you share

i imagine half of the people on ot wouldn't care, but you don't need to appeal to all of ot ^^ and once the sarcasm and irony dies and decomposes, i have trust that people will take the thread as seriously as many do with the patatitta or dm-for-mutual review threads

that being noted, you aren't obligated to continue, and maybe you find that this is part of a pattern you cannot sustain, even if some people value what you do. that should be something freely left to your discretion and comfort, and i wouldn't demand that you stay if you're suspecting that being here will continue to harm you

additionally, if the tech corner were to be locked, it doesn't necessarily mean a new one can't be created :>

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I have sent Blushing a few DMs and I've sent a report form too to the "government". I will see the replies I get and then choose how to proceed.

ok hope everything goes well, although it would be healthy to be more independent and stop treating the GMT's like your babysitter

(uh I think for this case its necessary to say, no insults intended!!!!)

if you believe you should keep doing then do it, if you believe otherwise then dont

Polyspora wrote: 4i695

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I have sent Blushing a few DMs and I've sent a report form too to the "government". I will see the replies I get and then choose how to proceed.

ok hope everything goes well, although it would be healthy to be more independent and stop treating the GMT's like your babysitter

(uh I think for this case its necessary to say, no insults intended!!!!)

You bitch about multiposts being against the rules then bitch about people asking GMTs, who are the ones supposed to enforce the rules.
Get a grip.

Also there's not as many replies because winny just shares stuff he likes, some people may like it too but if they replied every time 90% of the thread would be "cool".

Until I get a reply from the GMT and government, let's get back to business.

I have decided to try out Floorp Browser. So far, I do like it. I find it a more refined version of Firefox, with more customization, which is always nice. It also feels less heavy and more smooth. Not sure why, but yeah. I will come with a more detailed review when I have more time with it.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Until I get a reply from the GMT and government, let's get back to business.

I have decided to try out Floorp Browser. So far, I do like it. I find it a more refined version of Firefox, with more customization, which is always nice. It also feels less heavy and more smooth. Not sure why, but yeah. I will come with a more detailed review when I have more time with it.

firefox but better?? oh how i wish ;o; (a sincere wish, but not a particularly strong one)

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Until I get a reply from the GMT and government, let's get back to business.

I have decided to try out Floorp Browser. So far, I do like it. I find it a more refined version of Firefox, with more customization, which is always nice. It also feels less heavy and more smooth. Not sure why, but yeah. I will come with a more detailed review when I have more time with it.

firefox but better?? oh how i wish ;o; (a sincere wish, but not a particularly strong one)

there's librewolf, if you want

z0z wrote: 2h2d46

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Until I get a reply from the GMT and government, let's get back to business.

I have decided to try out Floorp Browser. So far, I do like it. I find it a more refined version of Firefox, with more customization, which is always nice. It also feels less heavy and more smooth. Not sure why, but yeah. I will come with a more detailed review when I have more time with it.

firefox but better?? oh how i wish ;o; (a sincere wish, but not a particularly strong one)

there's librewolf, if you want

That's far more privacy orientated than general purpose orientated.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

z0z wrote: 2h2d46

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Until I get a reply from the GMT and government, let's get back to business.

I have decided to try out Floorp Browser. So far, I do like it. I find it a more refined version of Firefox, with more customization, which is always nice. It also feels less heavy and more smooth. Not sure why, but yeah. I will come with a more detailed review when I have more time with it.

firefox but better?? oh how i wish ;o; (a sincere wish, but not a particularly strong one)

there's librewolf, if you want

That's far more privacy orientated than general purpose orientated.

idk what achro is looking for specifically

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

z0z wrote: 2h2d46

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Until I get a reply from the GMT and government, let's get back to business.

I have decided to try out Floorp Browser. So far, I do like it. I find it a more refined version of Firefox, with more customization, which is always nice. It also feels less heavy and more smooth. Not sure why, but yeah. I will come with a more detailed review when I have more time with it.

firefox but better?? oh how i wish ;o; (a sincere wish, but not a particularly strong one)

there's librewolf, if you want

That's far more privacy orientated than general purpose orientated.

i would be thoroughly left out of my own comfort zone of comprehension when trying to make an informed decision in either case :c it's a frustrating matter of "i don't actually actively plan to change, but... i'm tempted to look and wonder and hope, before leaving it to a whim", maybe? decisionmaking is generally exhausting

i probably would be comfortable enough with general-use browsers! although i did prefer the thought of firefox presumably being more lightweight and privacy-oriented (relatively) than chrome or edge or something else

Achromalia wrote: 5ev6p

i would be thoroughly left out of my own comfort zone of comprehension when trying to make an informed decision in either case :c it's a frustrating matter of "i don't actually actively plan to change, but... i'm tempted to look and wonder and hope, before leaving it to a whim", maybe? decisionmaking is generally exhausting

I think you shouldn't put too much thought into it and just try things out. I didn't discover that Librewolf is a bit too much for my needs and wishes until I tried multiple different browsers and whatnot and found what worked best for me.

z0z wrote: 2h2d46

idk what achro is looking for specifically

Fair enough.

So I'm curios to see how macOS works given that I've never touched a Mac



$4.99 just to snap windows? horrifying.

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

So I'm curios to see how macOS works given that I've never touched a Mac



$4.99 just to snap windows? horrifying.

last night i was helping a friend install windows on their new pc

i didnt have an install drive ready so i had to prepare a usb, and the only thing available in the viscinity was their macbook

needless to say after two hours of trying to figure out how to burn the windows iso into the drive i gave up and just did it on rufus windows

fuck you wonderiso im not giving you my money

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

So I'm curios to see how macOS works given that I've never touched a Mac



$4.99 just to snap windows? horrifying.

To my knowledge, its window managing system is just very old feeling. Things like window snapping or splits of any kind aren't possible by default. Maximizing is basically making the app full screen too. Alongside this, the ecosystem heavily favors if you have more Apple devices and the biggest nail in the coffin is the cost for such machines are extremely high and they still cheap out in places like RAM, which is hilarious and their defense against that is even more hilarious.

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

So I'm curios to see how macOS works given that I've never touched a Mac



$4.99 just to snap windows? horrifying.

I suffered for 7 years on a MacBook.

Being trapped with a pathetic 128GB and no games is not fun. I used a pirated version of Crossover (kinda like wine but you have to pay) until it told me to go fuck myself and stopped opening my games.

It eventually messed itself up after an update with too little storage remaining but that's beyond the point.

great_elmo wrote: 6o1l6a

(kinda like wine but you have to pay) until it told me to go fuck myself and stopped opening my games.

tbh a lot of the wine developement come from the CodeWavers team itself
🤓

Lapizote wrote: 6h554d

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

So I'm curios to see how macOS works given that I've never touched a Mac



$4.99 just to snap windows? horrifying.

last night i was helping a friend install windows on their new pc

i didnt have an install drive ready so i had to prepare a usb, and the only thing available in the viscinity was their macbook

needless to say after two hours of trying to figure out how to burn the windows iso into the drive i gave up and just did it on rufus windows

fuck you wonderiso im not giving you my money

Balena Etcher exists (tbf I've to agree that Rufus is superior)

Here's to hoping that no more bumps will happen... Let's go back to business.



You know, at one point during the video, he said that he never had soldered 30-pin SIMM slots in motherboards before and he wanted to do some practice and I'm frankly a bit shocked to hear that because Adrian seems extremely knowledge on this sort of stuff. I guess even the kings can mess up.

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Balena Etcher exists (tbf I've to agree that Rufus is superior)

dd is my favorite way. I haven't used Balena Etcher, personally. I believe Rufus is better.

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Balena Etcher exists (tbf I've to agree that Rufus is superior)

thing is etcher told me not to use it for windows isos since they require a "special" procedure and i just listened to it lol

Oh. I didn't knew that, frankly. ittedly, I think that's why they have their tool to make ISOs on Windows, so yeah.

I've been trying to use Floorp for the past two days or so. I guess these are my first impressions of it:

1. It seems more smooth on my system than vanilla Firefox, which is nice
2. They bring back the theme Firefox had before Firefox 89, with smaller tab sizes and a more tightly packed top section
3. There are more settings exposed, like the keyboard shortcuts or the profile manager
4. They add some new features like a sidebar
5. In the settings, they recommend some extensions, like Tree Style Tab or uBlock Origin
6. They don't themselves as the most privacy protecting browser. What they offer is similar to vanilla Firefox, which is alright.

Overall, I do like it. It is slightly more bloated than vanilla Firefox, but offers a nice experience either way. I highly recommend it.

Linux is for hipsters who think they're smarter than the average joe but uses an OS that requires at least 200.000 lines of codes to do the most basic function a computer can do.

Tad Fibonacci wrote: 476g6d

Linux is for hipsters who think they're smarter than the average joe but uses an OS that requires at least 200.000 lines of codes to do the most basic function a computer can do.

I was here

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I've been trying to use Floorp for the past two days or so. I guess these are my first impressions of it:

1. It seems more smooth on my system than vanilla Firefox, which is nice
2. They bring back the theme Firefox had before Firefox 89, with smaller tab sizes and a more tightly packed top section
3. There are more settings exposed, like the keyboard shortcuts or the profile manager
4. They add some new features like a sidebar
5. In the settings, they recommend some extensions, like Tree Style Tab or uBlock Origin
6. They don't themselves as the most privacy protecting browser. What they offer is similar to vanilla Firefox, which is alright.

Overall, I do like it. It is slightly more bloated than vanilla Firefox, but offers a nice experience either way. I highly recommend it.

well, vanilla Firefox's CSS is customizable so I don't see the point of installing a more bloated version of it.

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I've been trying to use Floorp for the past two days or so. I guess these are my first impressions of it:

1. It seems more smooth on my system than vanilla Firefox, which is nice
2. They bring back the theme Firefox had before Firefox 89, with smaller tab sizes and a more tightly packed top section
3. There are more settings exposed, like the keyboard shortcuts or the profile manager
4. They add some new features like a sidebar
5. In the settings, they recommend some extensions, like Tree Style Tab or uBlock Origin
6. They don't themselves as the most privacy protecting browser. What they offer is similar to vanilla Firefox, which is alright.

Overall, I do like it. It is slightly more bloated than vanilla Firefox, but offers a nice experience either way. I highly recommend it.

well, vanilla Firefox's CSS is customizable so I don't see the point of installing a more bloated version of it.

Again, it is smoother on my system, and frankly I don't want to mess with CSS. A team of people can do it better than I can, to be honest.

NGL, I would love to get systems like these, clean them up a bit and, hopefully, really explore what they were used for and hopefully either donating them or giving them to a recycling center where they can be scrapped or sold to collectors or something.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

NGL, I would love to get systems like these, clean them up a bit and, hopefully, really explore what they were used for and hopefully either donating them or giving them to a recycling center where they can be scrapped or sold to collectors or something.

oh to play with something obscure and thoroughly understand its every facet so that you could intuitively recite/refer to any/every function and application, and then master it completely to its optimum potential ;o;

thats the dream...

edit: did not expect to enjoy watching this so much that i view it nearly completely :> i cant really pretend i understand but i figure listening and watching will at least bring me some exposure to it

old pcs are fun if you use old software on it, it really hits that spot many pursue, the magic goes out soon, but it does feel like 2008 for a brief moment again.

my windows xp was wonderful in loading internet explorer (it took less than 10 seconds to load a page), but it sucked to load even the most simple cereal box games.

thats the things you will usually find on those:

personal documents, from school or work.
old images, usually family photos that the owner transferred from his 2000's nikon camera.
old songs.
a cd burner.
clocks, a lot of clocks and maybe some calendars.
one or two games other than windows experimental ones (solitaire).

about donating them, eh "old tech" from 2000's are not rare, I worked at this IT company for some time and they MOSTLY had 1995-2005 PC's. now if you find a macintosh in working order... sir... you have struck gold.

"I worked at this IT company for a time and they MOSTLY had 1995-2005 PC's"

it was so many that they started giving away some, because we didnt have space anymore, for some time my only work was to rip old 60GB HDD's the entire day (we had towers and towers of those).

Very sadly, Google is being really annoying and it seems Youtube, on other browsers that don't use Chromium as a base, they have noticeable lag compared to Chromium based browsers. Since Floorp has an agent spoofer, I was able to notice that without any spoofing, YouTube was pretty slow to load. With the spoofer on, it was quicker to load. Now on Brave and it loads in an instant. Really, really annoying. Going to stick with Brave, I guess. Actually, do I mind waiting a bit longer? No, not really. I can tank it.

Might be a necropost but I got this from my grandparents (my moms to be exact) today.



Yeah it only has an i3-2100 and 4GB RAM but it's still leagues better than what I currently have.

Unfortunately there's her Microsoft (she did tell me the ) but no wifi. Without it I CANNOT use it.

Front audio does not work.

Probably gonna turn it into a low end sleeper.

google be aggressive lately

great_elmo wrote: 6o1l6a

Might be a necropost but I got this from my grandparents (my moms to be exact) today.

The rig

Yeah it only has an i3-2100 and 4GB RAM but it's still leagues better than what I currently have.

Unfortunately there's her Microsoft (she did tell me the ) but no wifi. Without it I CANNOT use it.

Front audio does not work.

Probably gonna turn it into a low end sleeper.

Might be good to re-install Windows, to be honest. Fresh installs of Windows are always great and speedy.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

great_elmo wrote: 6o1l6a

Might be a necropost but I got this from my grandparents (my moms to be exact) today.

The rig

Yeah it only has an i3-2100 and 4GB RAM but it's still leagues better than what I currently have.

Unfortunately there's her Microsoft (she did tell me the ) but no wifi. Without it I CANNOT use it.

Front audio does not work.

Probably gonna turn it into a low end sleeper.

Might be good to re-install Windows, to be honest. Fresh installs of Windows are always great and speedy.

I don't think running windows on that thing is going to be a nice experience. Especially if it doesn't has SSD.

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

I don't think running windows on that thing is going to be a nice experience. Especially if it doesn't has SSD.

It seems he installed Mint on it. You're right as well, but at the same time, he didn't really specify if the computer has a SSD or not. If it doesn't, that would be the easiest and least expensive upgrade. Next will be RAM.

Recently I've tried Helix editor. Loving it so far. It's better than vim I guess

My favourite mouse is still Razer's Deathadder. Idk how tacky Razer is or how there's a bunch of better mice on the market, this one fits great in my hand and I love it

Will these be good upgrades to put into my current PC?

https://ca.partpicker.com/list/ZKtyjH *my mobo for reference

I will also probably throw in a used 3570

great_elmo wrote: 6o1l6a

Will these be good upgrades to put into my current PC?

https://ca.partpicker.com/list/ZKtyjH *my mobo for reference

I will also probably throw in a used 3570

The GPU is very weak, but considering your situation, I guess it is an improvement. Everything else is fine.

There's a new Firefox fork named Zen Browser. It is in alpha at the moment, but I'm hoping that it will become better and better overtime. For the moment, I haven't tried, but I plan to.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

There's a new Firefox fork named Zen Browser. It is in alpha at the moment, but I'm hoping that it will become better and better overtime. For the moment, I haven't tried, but I plan to.

that's not something you hear very often (firefox forks)

what's the difference with firefox

I'm back!

Patatitta wrote: 5t25

what's the difference with firefox

Zen says:

1. that it is built with hardware optimizations put in place for a smoother experience and I agree with them
2. it has some extra features like a sidebar
3. it has a new design language (it follows GNOME's styling mostly)
4. split tabs
5. vertical tabs

It is good. I don't like the vertical tabs too much, however.

TL;DR: Avoid this prebuilds like the plaque. In general, try to avoid prebuilds.

Hey winny, trying out the live mode of Linux Mint won't do anything with my PC right? Like my data is still there right?

Rhythm32 wrote: 5ti6u

Hey winny, trying out the live mode of Linux Mint won't do anything with my PC right? Like my data is still there right?

Yes, unless you go in and directly interact with stuff on the drive, which you shouldn't do at all! It will lead to data loss most likely.

TL;DR: 13th and 14th gen Us are mostly safe. Use the newest BIOS update for the motherboard you're buying and use the defaults. The entire situation seems to be a mixture of motherboard vendors pushing power to the absolute limit, poor microcode leading problems with boosting, variable quality control and management weirdness, alongside workloads being weird themselves.

I have been pwned in a data breach from The Internet Archive. Data was names, emails and s. If you have an there, might good to check if everything is fine.



In related news, some clown group on Twitter are such anti-social Twitter brainrot retards that they decide to DDOS The Internet Archive because the US government owns them and they enable Israel, expect the archive is ran by a non-profit, not the US government. Twitter retards being Twitter retards.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

I have been pwned in a data breach from The Internet Archive. Data was names, emails and s. If you have an there, might good to check if everything is fine.

In related news, some clown group on Twitter are such anti-social Twitter brainrot retards that they decide to DDOS The Internet Archive because the US government owns them and they enable Israel, expect the archive is ran by a non-profit, not the US government. Twitter retards being Twitter retards.

These guys are beyond retarded. full stop. They should've attack Visa or Mastercard or something.

Or is it an inside job by greedy corpos who are hell bent on destroying internet archive on the grounds of "copyright violaion"........ Who knows

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Or is it an inside job by greedy corpos who are hell bent on destroying internet archive on the grounds of "copyright violaion"........ Who knows

I 100% see American companies doing that. They love this type of shit.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Or is it an inside job by greedy corpos who are hell bent on destroying internet archive on the grounds of "copyright violaion"........ Who knows

I 100% see American companies doing that. They love this type of shit.

A french company did that too and they won 😭😭😭

Corne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Or is it an inside job by greedy corpos who are hell bent on destroying internet archive on the grounds of "copyright violaion"........ Who knows

I 100% see American companies doing that. They love this type of shit.

A french company did that too and they won 😭😭😭

American copyright law 💀

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Corne2Plum3 wrote: 3y1z1p

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

Jangsoodlor wrote: 4z5t12

Or is it an inside job by greedy corpos who are hell bent on destroying internet archive on the grounds of "copyright violaion"........ Who knows

I 100% see American companies doing that. They love this type of shit.

A french company did that too and they won 😭😭😭

American copyright law 💀

it's also possible that the attackers are just dumbasses

z0z wrote: 2h2d46

it's also possible that the attackers are just dumbasses

Oh, they most certainly are, but conspiracy theories are fun :3

New Intel Us launching on October 24th, 2024. This gen is named Arrow Lake and it will have a new naming scheme.



Intel Core i9-14900K -> Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core i7-14700K -> Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Intel Core i5-14500K -> Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

Intel is doing what AMD did with Zen5: lay out the groundwork for new stuff in the future. The most notable change between the 14th gen and this new line is the fact that Intel says they have reduced the power consumption by half, while having the same performance as the 14900K. That would be really good for Intel. It seems they're working on a new socket too, with better pressure on the U, so the need for a frame is removed.

I'm personally intrigued to see how these new chips perform.

More details below:

I'm too used to the "i" branding who thought it would be a good idea to ditch it?

huh, now just gotta wait for the 5090

It's amazing how far we have come in 25 years. I can only hope that things will progress at the same rate for the next 25.

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

New Intel Us launching on October 24th, 2024. This gen is named Arrow Lake and it will have a new naming scheme.



Intel Core i9-14900K -> Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core i7-14700K -> Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Intel Core i5-14500K -> Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

Intel is doing what AMD did with Zen5: lay out the groundwork for new stuff in the future. The most notable change between the 14th gen and this new line is the fact that Intel says they have reduced the power consumption by half, while having the same performance as the 14900K. That would be really good for Intel. It seems they're working on a new socket too, with better pressure on the U, so the need for a frame is removed.

I'm personally intrigued to see how these new chips perform.

More details below:

what nm?
intel still has a shit ton of catching up to do

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

what nm?
intel still has a shit ton of catching up to do

I think they're using TSMC's 3nm.

Core 2 Duo > Core ultra

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

what nm?
intel still has a shit ton of catching up to do

I think they're using TSMC's 3nm.

ha they bit the bullet
but also scary how dependent we are on TSMC for cutting edge chips dam

Intel's own chip fab seems to be going to plan, so says Intel.

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

Winnyace wrote: 182q6t

abraker wrote: 6cx2d

what nm?
intel still has a shit ton of catching up to do

I think they're using TSMC's 3nm.

ha they bit the bullet
but also scary how dependent we are on TSMC for cutting edge chips dam

at least they're trying to putting to put something in the us for continuity

man, idk what intel has done these last few gens, they just don't make them as tasty anymore